posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 12:53 PM
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread. There were lots of great comments and much food for thought. There were also some comments that
were not so great - such as certain posters who ridiculed the sign language interpreter - shame on you!!
It's obvious that we all have our thoughts or concerns about what the true motive of this test MIGHT be and opinions ranged anywhere from it merely
being a benign test (most popular opinion) to it being a planned announcement of some catastrophic event, some form of mind control or the rebooting
of our "systems" for some other nefarious purpose. Unless we're all walking around like zombies at 2:04 PM today, I don't think we'll be able to
have a definitive conclusion to that debate any time soon; however, I wanted to summarize some of the comments about the commercial itself that
bothered or made some posters (such as myself) feel uneasy (whether it was by visuals or feelings/thoughts invoked by the commercial):
- Whereas some felt the commercial is merely meant as a warning to prevent any form of mass panic during the EAS test (such as that which occurred
during the War of the Worlds radio broadcast in the 1930s), others felt this purpose would be overkill (and therefore a bunch of malarkey) if,
during the EAS test, it continuously broadcasts "THIS IS ONLY A TEST".
- Some felt it odd that they were so heavily publicizing a test that has just never been performed before on a national level and some questioned why
they would be doing it now, when global tensions are so high, as opposed to after 9/11 when our country was supposedly under attack. Also, one poster
took issue with the date of the test, 11-9-11, and felt that if nothing else was intended by it (which was questionable to him/her), it was strange
that the government wouldn't have realized that this would be noticed and perhaps insensitive to some people.
- Subconscious associations to other unsavory characters (i.e. Mr. Garrison from South Park or the cartoon depiction of “BOB” of the Church of the
SubGenius).
- Large odd symbol in the background of the American eagle being electrocuted by high tension wires (which is obviously the badge for the FCC but
still disconcerting).
- Disparity over the estimated time for the test (3 minutes versus 30 seconds) – the FEMA handbook provided by Wrabbit2000 states "The test will
last approximately three minutes, slightly longer than a monthly test, to ensure that the equipment will not “lock up” after two minutes (the
maximum length for all other EAS alerts)." It will be interesting to see how long this thing lasts...
- Many commented it was strange that they chose a stiff looking naval military officer as the commercial spokesperson as opposed to a celebrity or
other political figure who would have served the purpose of instilling calm or drawing the attention of viewers.
- Some were uncomfortable that the commercial was evidently broadcasted extensively in some areas but not others (for instance, it’s been viewed in
NY metropolitan area for approximately three days whereas some others in different parts of the country didn't see it for the first time until late
last night).
- Many felt it wreckless, and therefore suspicious, that, via these commercials, we are affectively announcing to the rest of the world the exact time
during which our nation will be vulnerable due to a communications blackout.
- The amount of times the commercial used the word "test" (which I counted as six times during the 30 second commercial).
- The low budgeted look which gave the impression that it wasn't an official commercial; what’s the point of having a “warning” commercial if
it’s not made in such a way as to capture a viewer’s attention.
- Reminiscent of Nazi propaganda used to perpetuate fear and keep control over citizenry.
Well, time is quickly drawing near and I’m sure we’ll have some of these issues put to rest within the next half hour or so. Thanks to everyone
for your comments and I’m sure there will be much more discussion to come…
Timidgal