Report: U.K. preparing for military strike on Iran nuclear facilities

Originally posted by caerloyw

The world is going mad...

I can remember how the future of the world looked bright in 1996. The Yugoslav Wars had ended, and everyone was expecting a future of peace in the 21th century.

I can't believe this #. What the PEOPLE of the UK think about it? An attack on Iran? It may start a World War... This is insane...

It wont start a world war, it might just prevent one though.

WHAT??? This is how you want to prevent a World War? Attacking a country? You should be crazy...

Originally posted by technologicalsingularity
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR

 

Dont forget Israel got caught out selling nuclear weapons to south Africa in the cold war, funnily enough, the nice chap who was wrapping up that deal is now leading Israeli government.

And don't forget that pre Mandela release, one of the last acts of the Apartheid regime was to hand over those nukes, (some of which 'went missing') to the nice chap that accompanied the 'nihilist' Dr David Kelly and is now the unelected, royally mandated pos that currently 'leads' the UK.

Originally posted by GLontra

Originally posted by caerloyw

The world is going mad...

I can remember how the future of the world looked bright in 1996. The Yugoslav Wars had ended, and everyone was expecting a future of peace in the 21th century.

I can't believe this #. What the PEOPLE of the UK think about it? An attack on Iran? It may start a World War... This is insane...

It wont start a world war, it might just prevent one though.

WHAT??? This is how you want to prevent a World War? Attacking a country? You should be crazy...

It would have worked in 1936

reply to post by caerloyw

It would have worked in 1936

I'd compare Israel to Germany before Iran..

Originally posted by sapien82
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR

 

so our "Humanitarian aid " aka air strikes and bombings didnt kill any civilians in Libya ?

sure man keep living in that dream world , its considered to the military as collateral damage
they dont really care how many civilians they kill as long as they get the job done.

Rebel / Terrorist , its just a name , the fact is that the UN had already named the libyan "rebels" as terrorists before we invaded Libya
You can check the UN report on an ATS thread here somewhere !

Of course they did, its a war zone

While we used laser guided precision strikes to AVOID civilian casualties, they however did not when they killed innocent people in buildings on trains & buses, did we? nope... or did we only hit the military targets only? yeap... maybe we should have struck back with bags of sweets & apples instead,

What that hell do you expect? its regrettable but we do not intentional aim & kill civilians, see the contrast here? maybe you don't

the fact is that the UN had already named the libyan "rebels" as terrorists before we invaded Libya

LOL WHAT? we all know very very well they was protesters that got shot at, until the troops opened up the armouries to the protesters getting murdered by there own insane leader and fought back, becoming Rebels, i'm sure Obama or any other civilized nations leader would do exactly the same, no im only joking they wouldn't were civilized

AND erm before we invade Libya? WE NEVER INVADED LIBYA mate another lol

Its about right & wrong, & picking the lesser of two evils

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by caerloyw

 

It would have worked in 1936

I'd compare Israel to Germany before Iran..

Crack on lets hear the comparison please?

Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by caerloyw

 

It would have worked in 1936

I'd compare Israel to Germany before Iran..

Crack on lets hear the comparison please?

Who have Iran imprisoned lately??

reply to post by BRITWARRIOR

or did we only hit the military targets only?

On Libya?
Your just joking right?
They hit a LOT more than just military targets..

This is serious people if the U.K. as well as the U.S. and other allied countries go through with this it will not be pretty. This should finally show people that our governments care nothing for our well being their going to turn this next attack on Iran into human's greatest mistake. Starting another conflict is absolutely ridiculous, especially when most of the countries of the world ain't exactly flourishing with their economies, this is going to be bad. I ain't the religious type, but if there is a god he's about to give humanity's it's greatest atrocity.

Originally posted by caerloyw
IF there is an attack on Iran and IF the UK is involved there will not be rioting on the streets or a revolution and it wont be the start of WW3 either. Russia and China are not going to fight on the side of Iran and nobody is going to start lobbing nukes around the globe, there is no benefit to Russia or China to Iran having nukes.

Please! You need to keep up with what's going on in the world!

The IAEA report already shows that China is supplying Iran with missiles, etc. And even though they claimed they would never do it, I guaranty you that Russia managed to supply those S-300s to Syria.

So, not to look like they're directly involved, you'll probably see China send North Korea into this mess since China is North Korea's lifeline as well as China's stooge and you'll probably see Russia supporting Syria, Lebanon and anyone else that wants to participate willingly. Throw in Venezuela. Chavez has as big of an ego as Ahmadinejad and he'll gladly participate in something like this if he thinks he has China and Russia on his side.

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR

 

The US, UK, Pakistan & Saudis was never funding the killings on innocent civilians, sorry they just wasn't

Have you been living in a cave for the last 50 years??

Please feel free to enlighten me again, i'm betting this is totally unrelated to current events which you need to be backing up with something, instead of past events, if you're going to drag up information from more then 50yrs now then maybe it is you who is living in the cave my friend, as the world is a very very very different place today,

Originally posted by Papi9378
This is serious people if the U.K. as well as the U.S. and other allied countries go through with this it will not be pretty. This should finally show people that our governments care nothing for our well being their going to turn this next attack on Iran into human's greatest mistake. Starting another conflict is absolutely ridiculous, especially when most of the countries of the world ain't exactly flourishing with their economies, this is going to be bad. I ain't the religious type, but if there is a god he's about to give humanity's it's greatest atrocity.

Yes, there is a God and this entire scenario is outlined in the Bible if anyone takes the time to read it.

I just don't understand how they all want to destroy the world
I just look forward to the day when this is all over with and the whole world gets along and lives in peace!
It's really sad to know there are little kids going to be hurt and killed because "THEY" have to destroy everything "THEY" created, ie. nukes bombs, guns...... all for oil and gold!

Originally posted by Deetermined

Originally posted by caerloyw
IF there is an attack on Iran and IF the UK is involved there will not be rioting on the streets or a revolution and it wont be the start of WW3 either. Russia and China are not going to fight on the side of Iran and nobody is going to start lobbing nukes around the globe, there is no benefit to Russia or China to Iran having nukes.

Please! You need to keep up with what's going on in the world!

The IAEA report already shows that China is supplying Iran with missiles, etc. And even though they claimed they would never do it, I guaranty you that Russia managed to supply those S-300s to Syria.

So, not to look like they're directly involved, you'll probably see China send North Korea into this mess since China is North Korea's lifeline and stooge and you'll probably see Russia supporting Syria, Lebanon and anyone else that wants to participate willingly. Throw in Venezuela. Chavez has as big of an ego as Ahmadinejad and he'll gladly participate in something like this if he thinks he has China and Russia on his side.

Why would China and Russia not do business with Iran?, they have weapons to sell, Iran wants to buy - it still doesn't equate to Russia and China being happy with a nuclear armed Iran.

Its one thing for China and Russia to supply weapons for small/er countries to fight the West and earn themselves some money. Quite another to get involved directly and end up at MAD - nothing in it for them then. It is quite useful too for them that the West spreads its self around distracted by these small conflicts rather than fixing the economy.

The US trained and sold equipment to Georgia, it didnt compel them to join in when the war broke out with Russia!

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR

 

or did we only hit the military targets only?

On Libya?
Your just joking right?
They hit a LOT more than just military targets..

I doing a massive face palm right now such a big face palm this one, typing with one hand while i face palm

Ok.... you go ahead, what was the other target, please don't say they hit civilians intentionally or i might just cry in despair,

Originally posted by caerloyw

Originally posted by Deetermined

Originally posted by caerloyw
IF there is an attack on Iran and IF the UK is involved there will not be rioting on the streets or a revolution and it wont be the start of WW3 either. Russia and China are not going to fight on the side of Iran and nobody is going to start lobbing nukes around the globe, there is no benefit to Russia or China to Iran having nukes.

Please! You need to keep up with what's going on in the world!

The IAEA report already shows that China is supplying Iran with missiles, etc. And even though they claimed they would never do it, I guaranty you that Russia managed to supply those S-300s to Syria.

So, not to look like they're directly involved, you'll probably see China send North Korea into this mess since China is North Korea's lifeline and stooge and you'll probably see Russia supporting Syria, Lebanon and anyone else that wants to participate willingly. Throw in Venezuela. Chavez has as big of an ego as Ahmadinejad and he'll gladly participate in something like this if he thinks he has China and Russia on his side.

Why would China and Russia not do business with Iran?, they have weapons to sell, Iran wants to buy - it still doesn't equate to Russia and China being happy with a nuclear armed Iran.

Its one thing for China and Russia to supply weapons for small/er countries to fight the West and earn themselves some money. Quite another to get involved directly and end up at MAD - nothing in it for them then. It is quite useful too for them that the West spreads its self around distracted by these small conflicts rather than fixing the economy.

The US trained and sold equipment to Georgia, it didnt compel them to join in when the war broke out with Russia!

Please! Do I need to remind you that all of the countries participating in the U.N. agreed to put sanctions on Iran how long ago???? And yet China and Russia ignored the agreement they voted to uphold.

Then you need to read up on how fast China rushed to Iran's rescue after the Stuxnet virus hit their nuclear facility.

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by caerloyw

 

It would have worked in 1936

I'd compare Israel to Germany before Iran..

Crack on lets hear the comparison please?

Who have Iran imprisoned lately??

And that that makes Israel Nazi Germany,

Tell you what... who is Israel funding to fire rockets back into Iran, but this tell you nothing right?

If ever a politician grows a backbone and says he will part the country from the US and do whats best for the UK, I will vote for the 1st time ever.

As it is, I cant vote for any party thats a lapdog to the US. All current parties disgust me.

Edit - Saying that, its probably pure propaganda considering the source.

Originally posted by Deetermined

Originally posted by caerloyw

Originally posted by Deetermined

Originally posted by caerloyw
IF there is an attack on Iran and IF the UK is involved there will not be rioting on the streets or a revolution and it wont be the start of WW3 either. Russia and China are not going to fight on the side of Iran and nobody is going to start lobbing nukes around the globe, there is no benefit to Russia or China to Iran having nukes.

Please! You need to keep up with what's going on in the world!

The IAEA report already shows that China is supplying Iran with missiles, etc. And even though they claimed they would never do it, I guaranty you that Russia managed to supply those S-300s to Syria.

So, not to look like they're directly involved, you'll probably see China send North Korea into this mess since China is North Korea's lifeline and stooge and you'll probably see Russia supporting Syria, Lebanon and anyone else that wants to participate willingly. Throw in Venezuela. Chavez has as big of an ego as Ahmadinejad and he'll gladly participate in something like this if he thinks he has China and Russia on his side.

Why would China and Russia not do business with Iran?, they have weapons to sell, Iran wants to buy - it still doesn't equate to Russia and China being happy with a nuclear armed Iran.

Its one thing for China and Russia to supply weapons for small/er countries to fight the West and earn themselves some money. Quite another to get involved directly and end up at MAD - nothing in it for them then. It is quite useful too for them that the West spreads its self around distracted by these small conflicts rather than fixing the economy.

The US trained and sold equipment to Georgia, it didnt compel them to join in when the war broke out with Russia!

Please! Do I need to remind you that all of the countries participating in the U.N. agreed to put sanctions on Iran how long ago???? And yet China and Russia ignored the agreement they voted to uphold.

Why do you keep starting with the word please?

If you have a problem with Russia and China breaking the UN sanction take it up with them or the UN. Plenty of occasions countries break sanctions, thats their right to and nothing to do with me.

My original post you have quoted was in reply to someone stating attacking Iran would lead to world war 3 and rioting on the UK streets - neither of which will happen. Why you feel the need to tell me Russia and China should not be sanction breaking I dont know? I would agree with you on that

Reading this thread is quite funny really, I have a board game I bought back in the early 90's called A Line in the Sand, a political and military game by TSR set in the middle east, and I think too many on here have been overdosing playing it.

Originally posted by caerloyw

Why do you keep starting with the word please?

If you have a problem with Russia and China breaking the UN sanction take it up with them or the UN. Plenty of occasions countries break sanctions, thats their right to and nothing to do with me.

My original post you have quoted was in reply to someone stating attacking Iran would lead to world war 3 and rioting on the UK streets - neither of which will happen. Why you feel the need to tell me Russia and China should not be sanction breaking I dont know? I would agree with you on that

Reading this thread is quite funny really, I have a board game I bought back in the early 90's called A Line in the Sand, a political and military game by TSR set in the middle east, and I think too many on here have been overdosing playing it.

Using the word "please" is my way of saying, WAKE THE HELL UP!

If China and Russia (or anyone else for that matter) is going to break every agreement set by the U.N., then we might as well just break up the U.N.! Remember, China and Russia AGREED to uphold these sanctions and VOTED for them. You do understand how the U.N. works, don't you?

Sounds to me like you need to go back to playing your board game.