Pat Buchanan: Occupy Wall St is going to end very, very badly

ATTENTION ALL

Let's tone it down a bit and focus on the topic please.

Thank you.

Originally posted by InformationAccount

Originally posted by sceptredisle

Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by sceptredisle

 

Good lord man .. how dare those people practice their protected rights of free speech! Kill em all!

It's one thing to not agree with their politics, another to wish violent harm..

Bah..

Why reason with a troll.

You are clearly severely deluded. OWS has NOTHING to do with free speech. Their intent is to OCCUPY public and private property, and to intimidate private citizens not officials, whether elected or not.

OWS IS A MOB NOT A PROTEST.

I liked your "Walking Debt" post sceptredisle.

You seem very intelligent and my guess is that you operate inside the financial system in some capacity. Given your previous posts I would say that you are distraught at what is happening inside the financial system, not out of concern for anyone but rather becuase it seems to be affecting your bottom line in some way, and yet you think the system will remain and will not fail completely.

You probably even think that you are immune in some way.

Whether you agree with the communist OWS or not they have the right to have thier voices and opinions be heard.

A Real Message From Protestors
www.abovetopsecret.com...

If you are seriously suggesting that violence be used to silence the voices of the people then you sir are the enemy and you deserve the totalitarian enema that the federal governement is about to shove up you conceited ass.

edit on 31-10-2011 by InformationAccount because: (no reason given)

THese folk are NOT protesting to officials whether elected or not, but hounding private individuals... and no, I am not a banker, but a screenwriter, journalist and a part time researcher for the 9/11 Truth Movement in my private life.

Originally posted by sceptredisle
[SNIP]

THese folk are NOT protesting to officials whether elected or not, but hounding private individuals... and no, I am not a banker, but a screenwriter, journalist and a part time researcher for the 9/11 Truth Movement in my private life.

If they are hounding you specifically then consider using deadly force to put them down if you must defend yourself.

My understanding is that they are protesting the idea of Capitalism at it's source (Wall St) because Capitalism does not in fact serve the greater good, but rather infects the government which is supposed to serve the greater good but is incapable of serving the greater good and does not.

Originally posted by InformationAccount
[SNIP]

If they are hounding you specifically then consider using deadly force to put them down if you must defend yourself.

My understanding is that they are protesting the idea of Capitalism at it's source (Wall St) because Capitalism does not in fact serve the greater good, but rather infects the government which is supposed to serve the greater good but is incapable of serving the greater good and does not.

edit on 31-10-2011 by InformationAccount because: (no reason given)

Everyone is entitled to go to the Government ot campaign to be given cahs. It is a basic right. I is for Government to say NO!

It is GOVERNMENT which did the bailouts and failed in its duty.

It is not for OWS or anyone else to intimidate any individual or group of individual becasue they are exeercising their constitutional right ot lobby for cash.

If OWS can do that, why should I, a taxpayer, not camp outside the home of a seriously child and bullhorn the parents for trying to save his life by asking for public health care funds? This sort of pushing-your-neighbour-around is exxactly what has gone out of hand in the UJK where everyone is whacking their neighbour with "Anti-Social-Behaviour Orders". These ASBO's have so got out of hand that people are prohibiting their neighbours from going out of their front door or playing their piano at 6pm in the evening making life hell for everyone.

You have anger with the bailouts, understandable, but you take your case to thos ewho made th epayments, NOT those who you think either have or maybe might have or could have had some dough from the Government.

reply to post by InformationAccount


true...Gov't has shifted from serving and protecting the people to serving and protecting special interest groups, corporations and banks as well as their own wallets.

Politicians should be paid a salary that is comparable to the mean salary a middle class family makes. The gov't positions were not created to be a life long career, but a way to make sure the common man has a say in the laws and ways the country is governed.

Politicians should have to rely on SS and not a special investment retirement plan only available to them. They should have to pay for medical insurance the same as we do, not have special free medical benefits that are not available to the common man.

If they had to live like the rest of us, they would quickly change their tunes and truly listen to their constituents.

Originally posted by sceptredisle

It is not for OWS or anyone else to intimidate any individual or group of individual becasue they are exeercising their constitutional right ot lobby for cash.

OWS should not target specfic individuals for psychological warfare operations, it will end badly.

The system is the problem and individuals just work within the system.

reply to post by iNkGeEk

1. I am the editor
2. I have chronic astigmatism making reading and typing without glasses which I lost a day or two ago, difficult.

reply to post by iNkGeEk


I say if, from the beginning, this was 'Occupy The Fed', Martial Law and violent crackdowns would have already happened.

FFS, Rid of the Central banking system the forefathers of America fought to abolish, and succeeded.

reply to post by sceptredisle


I'd say OWS is doing it's job if the other side are sending in the likes of you.

Is that you Bennie?

Is the Fed a little worried about it's mates??

BTW, the rest of your posts are just hate filled, lying rants and unworthy of a reply.

reply to post by LightAssassin


Agreed. The fed really does need to go. Privatization of the banking system was never the plan. By allowing a private organization to dictate the rules of how the money flows in the US you are, essentially, allowing the inmates to run the asylum.

But, as much as I hate to say it, i think Pat Buchanan is on the right track. If the OWS movements continue into the heart of winter, people will begin to get edgy. The police will be cold and miserable as will the protesters and when people are miserable they tend to make horrible decisions.

The other bad thing is, if the protesters pick up camp and pack it in because of the weather, they will lose face. And the movement will effectively be killed as it's unlikely to be picked back up in the spring. But the minute someone dies, either from conflict from the law or due to the environment, they will be martyred. Just look at the Iraq war vet in Oakland. Heaven forbid someone should die in these protests. The streets will run red if that happens.

reply to post by iNkGeEk


You really think you can rid of a Central Banking System without bloodshed?

reply to post by LightAssassin


Unfortunately, no. But I don't think the Fed is actually going anywhere. Washington is so far in their pocket that they could never allow the Fed to fail now. If it did you would see the entire global financial system completely crash.

So that won't be happening anytime soon. At least not until TPTB want it to.

So, does that mean that The Bilderberg Group is currently cooking something up just to pin something on OWS?

He is a charter member of The Bilderberg!