It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by faryjay
They're not quite distancing themselves (Clinton, Obama, Cameron, Sarkozy) but I think if it comes to it and if asked about it, they'll say "well we would have like to see him tried"
All of this is just awful.
Originally posted by faryjay
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by OzTruth
"what have I ever done to you"
Thats why i doubt it was Gadhafi.
Even if it was Gaddafi, we only know of bad things he's done apparently to his people via our beloved mainstream media. Do we always really believe that?
Do we always really believe that?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by blupblup
Question -
Is there any reason you are wanting to hold people accountible for crimes while excusing people accountible for crimes?
If the actions of the US / UK etc offend and shock your conscious that much, then where were you on Sudan? N. Korea? Iran? Syria? Somalia? Yemen?
Or are those ignored because there was no western involvement?
Dont get me wrong, accountibility and holding people to that standard is a noble goal. However, it loses nobility when the intent is political, rather than real.