It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrptr
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by ckitch
I dont or cant qutie say i agree with fakery crowd but i agree on one point that didnt sound like a normal boeing aireliner, i did see a few footages when the second plane hit the second tower on a bridge people all on the bridge were saying that wasnt boeing jet that a wasnt boeing jet, but people like in this video had no reactions at all when the plane hit, some people need to realize that factor it reminds of this photo.
Plane is hitting the tower, yet no reaction from the guy nor is he earing the sounds from it.
Thats pretty much strange, wouldnt you agree?edit on 30-9-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
In the video that this picture was taken from, the guy bolts...
Originally posted by woogleuk
Why didn't Bush react when told in the classroom? He didn't want to alarm the kids, and he had just been told that terrorists had flown planes into large buildings, how would you react?
On May 8, 2001 - four months prior to 9/11 - the president placed Dick Cheney in charge of "[A]ll federal programs dealing with weapons of mass destruction consequence management within the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Justice, and Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other federal agencies…" This included all "training and planning" which needed to be "seamlessly integrated, harmonious and comprehensive" in order to "maximize effectiveness." This mandate created the Office of National Preparedness in FEMA, overseen by Dick Cheney. 15
Dick Cheney was placed directly in charge of managing the seamless integration of all training exercises throughout the entire federal government and all military agencies. On 9/11 Cheney oversaw multiple war games and terror drills, including several exercises of NORAD, the Air Force agency whose mandate is to "watch the sky."
Originally posted by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
reply to post by Human_Alien
Sorry, looked at that point, can't see what you're talking about.
Originally posted by TWILITE22
reply to post by ProphetOfZeal
So correct me if I'm wrong,your saying that military planes or drones hit the towers?but because they would be identifiable on video they took the video,that clearly shows something other than commercial planes, and put a cgi plane over the military craft?It's a very plausible explanation,and something that a good number of people would not understand that have no knowledge of computer generated images.So with that in mind,people need to get the basics of why the os is wrong and the only way to get them to understand is to explain in simple terms,such as the buildings themselves could not,by laws of physics,fallen the way they did.Get them to understand that simple concept can and will lead them to the more intricate details of the "fairy tale"that the government has fed us.
Until we can lead them down the simplistic road of understanding,we should start easy with people that are so very passionate(and most are one way or another)it will give them food for thought and lead them slowly.What I'm trying to say is spoon feed them and the os'ers will eventually accept the unavoidable truth....Lies always have an expiration date
edit on 1-10-2011 by TWILITE22 because: (no reason given)
I'm not one to debate this one way or another,and don't want to try to convince anyone of anything.What I have observed in these last ten years since though is we all,no matter if you have no direct connection to the events on that day,we were all affected in some way.Even most os'ers have unanswered questions.Some of us have found answers and are taking action,some haven't come to the conclusion or refuse to believe the truth of 911,some are just trying to survive and move on without healing...Some have the credentials to study and tell us why the os is wrong(these will be heard) and some only have their own truth or their gut feeling of what happened.
Originally posted by earth2mayavision
reply to post by Human_Alien
Oh, I need to clarify that the hearings were held in Canada but I live in the US. This is an international undertaking (core countries: Italy, Canada, US, Germany, and I believe UK) precisely because PowersThatBe in the US will never allow a new investigation here if they can possibly help it. They are just entering the stages now of having the international lawyer put together the final report. I would guess it will be ready for delivery to the relevent government/NGO people in about three months.
BTW, this 9/11 report will not leave out entire chapters and important evidence that the "official" report did.
I know some people just think that getting to the truth is no longer irrelevent and that we should move on. I say differently, Unless and until we get to exactly how, why, and who (those who assisted on this side) did this to America, we will be making future decisions about this country based on lies and falsehoods. No way to move a country, a world, forward in enlightenment.
The American public is aware of the past lies told to us and that is why we will not let this go,like they have before.911 will not go away...and that's a good thing...never stop talking about it.
Originally posted by stirling
Think about this for a second folks...
Pearl Harbour was revealed to have been manipulatrd into happening through US Gov fervrent desire to enter the war....
Gulf of Tonkin incident manufactured to brinh US ground troops into the vietnam conflict.
Operation North Woods describes a Plan to blow up civilian airliners, etc in order to create the situatin where the US could justify attacking and conquering Cuba....The plan is very similar in principal to 9 -11.
Battleship Maine Explodes in Havanna harbour due to coal taken aboard.
But it is made to apear an act of war to kick off spanish american war....
Simple theatrics, real dead bodies, but not the people who were using these sutuations.......they prospered in every instance.
Originally posted by Teebs
Originally posted by pshea38
reply to post by Teebs
I don't see how any of your perception distorting explanations can explain away the behaviour of these birds.
Look, I just spent a lot of effort on a post trying to give a rational response to an irrational claim about CGI planes, and now you're asking me to 'debunk' a flock of birds?
If the first guy wasn't trying to waste my time, you certainly must be.
I'm not falling for it again.edit on 30-9-2011 by Teebs because:
Originally posted by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
reply to post by ProphetOfZeal
Why are 'no planers' 'shills', but people who think the Pentagon was hit by a missile 'truth movement'?