It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by RelentlessLurker
They posted the information with the intent to harass him and his family. I don't think that public servants should be bullied into getting new jobs. Let's flip this a second. You work at a grocery store. A customer calls you a dirty name, you call the customer something. Another customer posts you information online with instructions on how to harass your family. Should you have to get a new job?
it's providing it under the context of revenge for an inappropriate action
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by undo
and do you know how to deal with such annoyances ???
you call a magic number and have your 'personal information' removed from their list !!!!
you aren't complaining about how they acquired your 'private' information, so what's the dealio?
you were obviously 'bothered or annoyed' by the intrusion, but you certainly aren't calling them criminal, are you?
does that coin you're flipping look the same on both sides?
Originally posted by HermitShip
reply to post by mudbeed
Dont be so quick to judge ole boy. Dont be so quick to judge. Anon is everywhere. High places. Low places. 16 years old. 80 years old. Jobless. Working within the Government. Professionals. Non Professionals. Pizza delivery People. Spe Ops.
You just never know where, or who, or where not, and who not. Computer skills is just one component of Anon. There are many components.
Just think how fast the name of this thug was confirmed.
They are anonymous,
They are legion
They do not forgive,
They do not forget,
Expect them
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by undo
you can call it whatever you like but English is preferred.
your perception doesn't make it fact.
so, you're OK with a company of whom you've never heard or conducted business, calling you (annoying you) on your 'private' line and are willing to 'put up with it' ... at least that's what was said.
BUT ... taxpayers who pay for this offender in every aspect of his life don't deserve to know or access public information ?? The same public information that was sold to the company exampled above.
interesting rationale you've developed.
guess maybe you'd be the one we would have to remove the telephone from cause you just aren't responsible enough to handle the privilege, right?