It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zerozero00
Originally posted by Mcupobob
So is anyone going to try and "Debunk" the OP are we just going to sit back and call him a sheeple or shill?
Can you explain what it is here that needs debunking?
this is just a load of bull with no credability at all.....is this ment to be proof of the OS?
You took the words right out of my mouth when you talked about this movement taking away from those who were killed and their families, as well as wrongly places blame.
Originally posted by Mcupobob
Originally posted by zerozero00
Originally posted by Mcupobob
So is anyone going to try and "Debunk" the OP are we just going to sit back and call him a sheeple or shill?
Can you explain what it is here that needs debunking?
this is just a load of bull with no credability at all.....is this ment to be proof of the OS?
The evidence put forth, I don't see any reason why isn't credible. Explain why the video is wrong instead of just calling bull.
Originally posted by Gannicus
If there is one thing truthers AREN'T interested in, its the truth.
1. After 10 years, and the continued involvement of hundreds to thousands of conspirators -- from the CIA to NIST to the FDNY (who apparently had to lie in interviews about predicting that WTC7 would collapse from the fire; see Firehouse Magazine, April 2002) -- why has not a single credible person come forward, even anonymously, to blow the whistle on this enormous coverup and thereby collect on a guaranteed multimillion dollar book deal with film rights, national heroism, and worldwide fame? 2. If explosives were used to demolish WTC7, why do we not see or hear a SINGLE flash or detonation, as can be found in EVERY video of a controlled demolition? Even more to the point, how is it that before the building starts to move, not one pane of window glass shatters from the shock wave that would have resulted even from a single detonation blast capable of cutting a steel column? No, a couple of "eyewitness accounts" of "explosions" are meaningless. We have video and audio evidence from multiple angles in this case. Video and audio recordings are much more reliable than human accounts and memories. 3. If incendiaries were used to demolish WTC7 -- the first time this has ever been attempted, certainly on a tall building -- how were the incendiaries ignited so as to cut the columns precisely at once, given that incendiaries are non-explosive and burn relatively slowly? Maybe because they used a secret super-efficient military demolition incendiary developed at Area 51 with the help of aliens and Elvis? 4. Why would leaseholder Larry Silverstein "admit" in a videotaped interview that he had ordered the demolition of WTC7? And if he had, why didn't the New York Port Authority sue him for a billion dollars for successfully plotting to destroy one of its most valuable properties? 5. In order to make the collapse "read" more like a catastrophic accident, why didn't the conspirators have WTC7 collapse in pieces, or sideways, or go down slowly a-clunkity-clunk? (If any of those are even physically possible -- Truthers seem to think they are.) Similarly, if they faked plane crashes at the Pentagon and Shanksville, why not scatter more fake debris about so as to dissuade anyone from getting suspicious? 6. Truthers are extremely proud of the 1,500 electrical engineers, chemical engineers, naval engineers, residential architects, students, interns, etc. on their petition at ae911truth.org. Why does this list have any more credibility than the 750 credentialed scientists who endorse intelligent design at dissentingdarwin.org? Why is one list impressive, while the other is dismissed as a bunch of fringe outliers who misrepresent scientific consensus? 7. Why is there no petition of demolition professionals endorsing the controlled-demolition hypothesis? If it's because they're afraid of being assassinated, as Truthers claim happened to car-crash victim Danny Jowenko, a Dutchman who is the only demolition-industry person in the world to have come out in support of the movement -- then why are 1,500 ae911truth "experts" willing to risk their lives? 8. Why hasn't A SINGLE PAPER been published in a peer-reviewed engineering or demolition-industry journal challenging the NIST report or any part of the NIST report? Before you bring up our paint-chip collector friend Steven E. Jones, Bentham Open journals are not peer reviewed; it is a vanity press that charges $800 per article. Google "CRAP Paper Accepted By Journal" for more on Bentham. 9. Why has nobody come up with a plausible alternate theory to explain what happened? In science, you come up with a hypothesis, then you make observations and collect evidence, and then if applicable, you publish a theory supporting the hypothesis with evidence. This is required for the ideas to be scrutinized, and either validated or falsified, by others. The Truthers have no hypothesis except "demolition charges did it." That hypothesis is plainly falsified by the video and audio evidence.
For instance, how much money would it take to get you to kill 3,000 random, innocent Americans? Or, say you stumbled upon somebody else's plan to kill 3,000 innocent Americans. How much would it take to get you to stay silent afterward?
A hundred dollars? Two hundred? Two hundred fifty?
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
I have a question for you guys who believe our government killed all those people as a "false flag" effort to justify going into other countries and killing them. (Also, I wonder if you are the same folks who believe our government is trying to kill us/alter us by spreading chemicals in the air via any type airplane, and also controlling our minds through some amazing feat of mind control). Are you? Just curious.
Anyway, why do you spend another day on this soil? If I honestly believed I lived in a country that was capable of mass murder of it's own innocent, tax paying citizens, I would be out of here pronto. There is no way I could contine to live in and support a country that I honestly believed was capable of these overt and covert heinous murderous crimes. The world is huge. There are many other places to go. I would leave this country ASAP.
So again, why do you stay here? How do you justify maintaining citizenship in what you perceive as a country capable of murdering it's own citizens? Are you really that different from me, that you would stay in such a country?
**************************
It is the NWO behind this
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by XplanetX
It is the NWO behind this
And who are they? Who is their leader, and what is his address? Do they have offices in the white house?
Malta? Where?
I think I might like to pay him a visit.edit on 9/14/2011 by ladyinwaiting because: (no reason given)