It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Because the Government supports the flying spaghetti monster?? Or what?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Face it - if there WERE something along the lines of geo-enginerring (by chemtrailsor any otehr means) that actually existed there would be MOUNTAINS of evidence - there would be chemicals, there would be whistle blowers, there would be strange trucks on airport ramps and aprons that could not be connected to "normal" aircraft servicing, there would be manuals and bills of sale, there would be measureable effects of some sort - if we were being poisoned then there would be health effects, if it was for geo-engineering then there would be geo-engineering effects.
NONE OF THESE HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND!
... vitamins, dietry supplements, etc.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
What's your motive saying things are happening and then not actually having any evidence to support your claims????
Originally posted by burntheships
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Because the Government supports the flying spaghetti monster?? Or what?
Well, actually many of us might imagine that it does.
That being just wrong, just plain wrong!
Taxz money should not be spent on imaginary villians...
Yet...the Government has made a religious practice from them!edit on 15-9-2011 by burntheships because: spelling
Originally posted by burntheships
U.S. Global Change Research Program.
With its 2 billion dollar a year budget for 2011, its sure to be a game changer.
downloads.globalchange.gov...edit on 13-4-2011 by burntheships because: foggy glass
One option raised by Holdren and proposed by a Nobel Prize-winning scientist includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays..........
Holdren, a 1981 winner of a MacArthur Foundation "genius" grant, outlined these possible geoengineering options:
•Shooting sulfur particles (like those produced by power plants and volcanoes, for example) into the upper atmosphere, an idea that gained steam when it was proposed by Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen in 2006. It would be "basically mimicking the effect of volcanoes in screening out the incoming sunlight," Holdren said....
But he said there could be grave side effects. Studies suggest that might include eating away a large chunk of the ozone layer above the poles and causing the Mediterranean and the Mideast to be much drier.
And those are just the predicted problems. Scientists say they worry about side effects that they don't anticipate. www.msnbc.msn.com...
Originally posted by OwenGP185
2020
£200 a month "new and improved" oxygen tax