It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jamieastronaut
All I was trying to prove was if they had explosives set up ready to demolish building 7, which takes at least a few days to set up, wouldn't you naturally assume that 1&2 might have been rigged as well? I know it's quite unbelievable for this guy to just blatantly admit that they "pulled" the building...
Originally posted by jamieastronaut
I know it's quite unbelievable for this guy to just blatantly admit that they "pulled" the building.
Originally posted by stainlesssteelrat
Much more baffling is BBC announcing WTC7 had collapsed with it standing behind presenter's back, priceless.
Or guy from NIST saying that there was no witnesses of molten steel, where dozens described quite vividly and accurately.
I personally think clinging to silverstein's interview will make more bad to the cause than good, it can be too easily dismissed. We have to stick to hard facts if we hope to ever unveil this atrocity.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
Originally posted by Ewok_Boba
Originally posted by WarminIndy
I think no one has ever addressed this in any forum. Weren't the Twin Towers mostly offices and some restaurants? I believe there was a day care center too. Now any good fireman will tell you that fires of today burn different than fires 50 years ago and that is because of the different chemicals used in our modern conveniences. So in those models of buildings burning, did they take into account the many tvs and computers that were there?
If your computer is burning, and especially back then before the new flat screen HD ones, the cathode ray tubes would have burned and left certain chemicals. We know that your house may have one computer, but the Twin Towers had hundreds of computers. And the kitchens, I am sure those appliances must have left chemical traces also.
While we see all kinds of models these "Truthers" want to throw out there, in all of them they failed to mention the fact that hundreds of computers made of chemicals burned and left certain chemicals, that combined with other chemicals would make certain compounds not usually found in regular fires. Now toss jet fuel on top of that not to mention the thousands of feet of coaxial cable that fed into the televisions and modems. Would they not also melt and mix with other chemicals?
That is not even including the many telephones. I would imagine that the Twin Towers also had a main frame server to manage the computer system.
Has any model taken that into account?
You are doubting the "truther" version of what happened solely based out of speculation. You offered no evidence to support your claim. Thanks for the contribution.
Do I need to prove there were computers being used in offices? Or do I need to prove there was a day care center? Ok let's go with the first...
americanhistory.si.edu...
tbtf.com...
Hmm, over 700 different companies, with computers and fax machines and telephones. Those are just the companies, not the office rooms they occupied.
en.wikipedia.org...
www.scienceclarified.com...
Now do I have to name every chemical in a CRT?
www.youtube.com...
Now that video is just one computer burning.Imagine 700 computers on fire
So do I have to keep posting endless youtube videos that show stupid people doing stupid stuff because it might give you a clue?
Originally posted by Edgecrusher26
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
It seems to me and quite a few more people on this website that you are the one recycling media fed tripe, and trying to pass it off as your own studying of the topic.
Let me be perfectly clear in this post 9/11 = INSIDE JOB!
9/11 commission report, how long was it before any witnesses were called up to the stand and any "Official story" was made public or any Official investigations started?
Was it 441 days? I'm not sure dude maybe you had better fill me in...
Pearl harbor was getting amongst its investigations and tribunal hearings with in 3 days of the bombings happening, heads rolled ( The wrong ones of course) but hey lets ignore that fact about 9/11 shall we that it took 441 days for the GOVT to create a story that made all the pieces fit.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
reply to post by Ewok_Boba
So a computer burning in one room can cause damage? That much you admit? And the video I posted was silly and I posted it for a reason. It is people like you who demand credibility while yet denying the credible accounts of the victims and witnesses.
Do you even know where the origins of the lies came from?
Here is one link www.slate.com...
We can post videos all day long, but at the end of the day, airplanes were hijacked, thousands were killed and the Twin Towers fell. Why is it so hard to give any honor and remembrance to those who died?
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by sageofmonticello
You just dont get it do you. It was an inventory of ALL of the DoD's equipment....ships, tanks, aircraft, rifles, parts MRE's everything and the adjustments made to make the records match. Not missing money. 2.3 trillion dollars is YEARS worth of Dod budgets, and anyone who thinks that it was 2.3 trillion dollars in money that came up missing is flat out foolish.
Originally posted by WarminIndy
And this is where we need to get back to, the original lie. All these "Truthers" have done is taken one disproven conspiracy theory and built more theories on top of it. Let's get back down the the original lie, which is the foundation, that there were no Jews there. Lie debunked over and over and over again.