It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mileslong54
reply to post by wrkn4livn
Flight 93 was shot out of the sky by the order of Dick Head (of Defense at the time) Cheney and he admitted it.
Originally posted by tristaneldritch
Again, any takers for a good explanation as to WHY Building 7 might have been demoed by the 9 11 Cabal? Without a good reason for actually taking the risk of doing it, it would seem more plausible that it was just accidental collateral damage from the collapse of 1 and 2.
Aside from that, it is well known that on sept, 10 2001 Rumsfeld admitted that $2.3 trillion of USA money was "missing" it is thought that the evidence to track this money was held in WTC 7. Speculation but a compelling reason, no
Originally posted by liejunkie01
reply to post by smurfy
Even the cut columns are covered in dust, that means circulating dust does it not.
I see slag from a torch cut.
Still there is no date or time in the photo. Am I supposed to take the word of you guys
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by spav5
c) skyscrapers never collapse by burning - NOT RELEVANT
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
- The French use a demo technique, that doesn't use explosives, but does use the weight of upper floors to crush the lower floors. And guess what, a building destroyed this way looks EXACTLY like the Twin Towers.
1. No other building ever collapsed from fire - A BS argument:".
9. The Pentagon had a missile defense system - NOT TRUE
2 .The building looked like demos/ There's no other explanation a rational, intelligent person can reach -
The French use a demo technique [that] use[s] the weight of upper floors to crush the lower floors. And guess what, a building destroyed this way looks EXACTLY like the Twin Towers.
I quoted your whole post because this is an exampe of "truther fail". You did not post any links to the pictures. You are scalding the op for links and facts and you support no facts what so ever. A picture is just a picture......... No dates, no times, no links, no nothing Empty words Like your post that has two stars already. This is a perfect example of not doing the proper homework
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by captainnotsoobvious
Good post. As always any attempt to get at the real truth and actually deny ignorance gets few flags while threads based on nothing but fabrication get hundreds and I think that is a shame and speaks poorly about us as a group.
I however do think that WTC7 did come down as a result of pre-planted demolition devices to protect sensitive documents. I even agree with the reason I believe they did it. Part of the reason I think so is the care they took over multiple hours to make sure nobody was inside or around it when it came down.
As to all the rest; utter nonsense. I think a lot of it is coming from people who's visions is so clouded by hatred of authority they accept anything negative without question. People who will argue it is true regardless of the fact there simply is no evidence and its all conjecture and fabrication.
That Terrorist attack has caused this country enough pain and the Truther Movement is adding to that pain for no good reason. It's just become an Anarchist tool and a vehicle for the haters in our society to use as a weapon. Not to mention the Truthers have actually been helpful to the same Terrorists who did kill those innocent people; so helpful in fact I wonder if there are not some Terrorists involved in pushing the Truther agenda. That is a real Conspiracy.