It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The village of New Baltimore is a dozen or more miles by automobile but eight as the wind blows, which it was doing a year ago. Melanie Hankinson was at the church next to her home, transfixed before a television that showed the World Trade Center ablaze, when the man who sprays her lawn stopped by to tell her he was finding odd things in the weeds.
"He said there was a loud bang and smoke and then these papers started blowing through your yard," she said. "I said, 'Oh.' Then I went back to the TV." Then the parish priest, the Rev. Allen Zeth, told her an airplane had crashed in Shanksville.
For the next few hours, Hankinson gathered charred pages of in-flight magazines, papers from a pilot's manual -- she remembers a map showing the Guadalajara, Mexico, airport -- and copies of stock portfolio monthly earnings reports.
"And there was some black webbing -- a lot of people found that," she said. The webbing, flexible where it hadn't burned, crisp where it had, was from insulation lining the belly of the jetliner."
quote John Fleegle
By Wednesday morning, crash debris began washing ashore at the marina. Fleegle said there was something that looked like a rib bone amid pieces of seats, small chunks of melted plastic and checks
Originally posted by waypastvne
The second debris field at shanksville has been brought up many times lately , I decided turn this into a thread of it's own, so it doesn't just get lost on page 10 of some other thread. This is my evidence, show me yours.
No I don't want your opinion, I want your evidence.
The town of New Baltimore is located 8 miles south east of the crash site. IT WAS STRAIGHT DOWN WIND OF THE CRASH SITE on sept 11. This is the furthest distance that debris was collected.
Most of the debris collected in New Baltimore was found in the back yard of this church by a grounds keeper and collected by Melanie Hankinson.
Originally posted by thedman
The 8 mile distance cited by the was because a MORON punched the locations into a mapping program which
gave THE ROAD DISTANCE if one was driving.
The debris found at Indian Lake was bits of paper and metallic foil insulation.
Originally posted by ATH911
Your skeptic buddy "thedman" says whoever cited the 8 mile distance is a "MORON":
Originally posted by Six Sigma
Do you have anything of substance to add to this thread?
I didn't think so.
Originally posted by ATH911
Your skeptic buddy "thedman" says
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by waypastvne
Can you tell me what forces would be exerted on an inverted aircraft positive G's, and how these would differ from the forces on a non inverted aircraft, same angle, same speed ?
No, tell me.
Oh come on truther Its easy, here let me help. Here is a drawing of a 40 deg. inverted Boeing 757. I put some different coloured arrows on it. Now can you tell me what force each of those different coloured arrows represents ?
Originally posted by ATH911
Tis, look who's talking?!
Originally posted by smurfy
The only comment I would make is, if all the debris found at New Baltimore could be carried by the wind, that's okay. If not all the debris found at New Baltimore could have been carried by the wind, then the 'plane was on fire before it crashed. If there was a wind or some kind of breeze, that would be one way of finding out and also that hot air will carry light material upward anyway.
Again, if there was also light unburnt material, like pieces of carbon fibre, an abundance of it might show how and when it fractured. More to the point, was there any heavy material found anywhere other than the Shanksville site, like at Indian Lake for instance?
Originally posted by Blaze090
Were you serious when you said it was carried on a cloud? Did the cloud have a silver lining to hold the cargo?
Whose paycheck was that if not a passenger? Was there ever any follow up on that? (just curious. Never read taht before)
Please consider this and consider it hard: The plane was shot down. The reason it was denied was due to the feared outrage it might (have) cause when the people realized their own government took out their own people. This is why 'Let's Roll heroes' were made up to take the onus off the guilty party.
Period.
The end of controversy.
The most famous non-conspiratorial mantra is: if it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck!
This reeks of a damn duck being shot down in plain daylight..... my friend. (didn't Cheney have a duck accident? How ironic!)
Originally posted by Blaze090
Period.
The end of controversy.
Originally posted by GenRadek
The "cloud" was the mushroom cloud from the enormous fireball that went up after the plane plowed into the ground, causing its fuel to burst and explode.
Originally posted by ATH911
How did it manage to do that when we are told all that "loose ground" immediately fell back in on itself, covering the hole and "plane"?
a man named Bob Pile......recalled "what seemed like buckets of gravel" hitting the roof of his house on the morning of 9-11 around the time of Flight 93's reported impact. Bob says his home is one mile away from the crash site. He thinks it is very odd that gravel would reach his home over that distance, and had no explanation as to how this might have happened. We asked him how an airplane as large as Flight 93 could fit into a hole of such significantly smaller dimensions and showed him a representative diagram of the plane and crater dimensions, and he shook his head, unable to reconcile the disparity in dimensions.
Charles McCauley chimed in at this point. McCauley described the debris he'd recovered from his property - black seat backings that the FBI identified as coming from Flight 93. Charles had no idea how these pieces of plane seats could have made their way the few miles to his house. McCauley, like many others, turned this debris over to the FBI. Both Pile and McCauley described lots of paper, parts of magazines, some solid matter (pieces of seats and metal) and checks carried by the wind in the days following 9-11, all of which was determined by the FBI to be from Flight 93.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Wow that's a stupid question.
There is a better question waiting for you halfway up this page.
Originally posted by ATH911
Why do you say it's stupid? It negates your question.