New ATS Member Claiming To Have Important Warning/Information. You Be The Judge...

The quake in Northern California is gone! They upgraded it and then took it out?

I was just looking at the usgs map for the US, and this may not belong on this topic, but has anyone noticed the yellow quake marks, those occurring in the past week, you could almost take a ruler and see they run in almost straight lines running from the sw. To ne. In direction. Almost straight lines. Looks odd.


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by relyt


I saw the red square on USGS, it was right above the city of Redding. Then I saw JustMike had posted it, so I clicked his link to see if it was the same one I was seeing but at a different magnitude - and yes...it was the same one he had seen. But it's totally gone now, and it all happened so fast.

Why would they bother upgrading the size just to take it off completely. Or maybe it's something done automatically?

reply to post by kdog1982

I think my head is going to explode!

which is exactly why we all need to contribute
slow down, there's more.
TM doesn't really phase me, if he/she is real then i offer thanks, if faux, nothing gained, nothing lost.
i will say thank you to TM for bringing a sense of urgency to soooo many who seemed nonchalant just a few days/weeks ago. whether we are acting on TMs 'warning' or our own desire to learn, they both work so thanks to the image that is TM

reply to post by onthelookout

Ya same here. Went to click on the square and got the 404. Backed up and got a screenie of the page quick.

reply to post by summer5


Oops! Sorry, I hit the wrong reply- to!
Ringing is building in intensity again. Let's play guinea pig! It started the first time about a half hour before the 7.2.
Anything in the next 1/2 hourish is mine!!!
Guess I'm not going to get anything done again today!

reply to post by wasobservingquietly


There were a couple of us experiencing something similar around the same time here on this thread that was started by JustMike regarding an experiment in alternative earthquake predictions

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by onthelookout

The upgrade to a 4.3 was done automatically in this case. I recall the data page stated that the event had not been reviewed by a seismologist. (They always state this until they're reviewed.)

I'm a bit puzzled that they removed this quake. I've seen quite a few instances of quakes in Nevada, Wyoming and Utah being removed (and we have some logged with evidence in the "Experiment" thread I mentioned earlier), but I can't recall seeing a mag 4-plus in Cali being pulled. And they sure did it fast!

I'd be interested in what Westcoast has to say when she gets back in. If there have been other similar cases lately she'd likely recall them. Maybe not the specifics, but the fact that they happened (if they did).

It would bother me less if it were not for the fact that it happened today of all days, right when we are watching the quake maps like hawks.

In any case I have the screen shot saved of the USGS Nth America region map showing this quake. There was also a mag 2.7 on the same map. Seems it was located just west of Salt Lake City at a rough guess. I opened a new window to check it out but it had also vanished so I have no data. But I have a screenshot of the map that shows it as well.

Mike

ok everyone, short of tooting my own horn ... anyone know why these aren't appearing on USGS ?

09-15-2011 10:49:34.930 (PDT) 11.7 miles E of HENDERSON-NV 36.0677 -114.7718 0.1 2.0
09-15-2011 09:50:06.360 (PDT) 21.3 miles ESE of BIG_PINE-CA 37.0382 -117.9390 18.5 1.6
09-15-2011 08:44:26.810 (PDT) 12.9 miles E of HENDERSON-NV 36.0597 -114.7491 0.0 2.0
09-15-2011 07:13:19.285 (PDT) 12.9 miles E of HENDERSON-NV 36.0597 -114.7491 0.0 2.0
09-15-2011 03:38:46.865 (PDT) 4.9 miles SSW of Truckee-CA 39.2529 -120.2078 9.2 1.4

i do realize they are minimal in magnitude but they are usually recorded on USGS ... am wondering why these don't appear. notice, they are all today and remarkably, very near the 37th parallel, again. source

reply to post by onthelookout


In California they have an automatic system. Lots of quakes are delete and some posted with question marks as magnitudes. In other regions quakes are review before posting.

I'm so glad you're all on the case. I'm preferring to sit back and read rather than do much writing. I hope middlebrook comes and writes here. They have succeeded in getting a following.

I'm a mystery junkie. A few weeks ago I finished watching an entire BBC TV series on Sherlock Holmes. I am a information junkie. A weather junkie. An all things wierd junkie. But in order to investigate I've had to become skeptical. I'm not quite cynical- but getting closer every day.

I had fun trying to deciphering the name middlebrook. I accept the possibility a whistle blower could use the ATS forum. It's just that I find nothing credible nor compelling. Other than the specific words in the "story".

Maybe I've watch one too many bad sci-fi films. MST3K fan. The last one I watched was so bad I couldn't finish it. It was about Yellowstone so I should have been hooked. But once they started talking about stopping the eruption, and the space-time continuum in the same sentence.

I think middlebrook's posts are scripted.
I feel the same way about the posts as I did when I was a kid and watch a show that ended with a cliff hanger. I wasn't keen to wait a week to find out. I was angry and felt like I was being strung along. Obviously that's the purpose behind a cliff hanger. To keep you tuned in.

To determine if this person is legit, I decided to question motive and the compostion of writing. When I did my reading, I found that nothing much seemed genuine.

I welcome the oppurtunity to be convinced that there is substance and purpose behind all this.
But I'm still waiting for something convincing.

reply to post by onthelookout

Just to clarify: that thread was started by Kattrax, not by me. I have something over 300 posts there but I'm just a contributor to it (and hence to the experiment that is still ongoing), not its author.

Very interesting thread, though and well worth a look through for anyone who has an interest in seeing what can be done.

Best regards,

Mike

reply to post by JustMike


Ooops. Once upon a time I knew that. But you've been such a fantastic contributor in regards to the thread that in my mind it has been dubbed "JustMike's Thread".

ETA: No disrespect to kattraxx - the original author of the thread I referenced.

reply to post by JustMike


Hi JustMike!!

A big ole thank you for everything you've contributed!!! If you ever do get to the USA and visit Nashville, I owe you dinner as a thank you for the education!

OiO

reply to post by Honor93

They are on the USGS maps, but you need to use the US map, not the Nth America map. At least, I had no trouble finding them on the US map when I zoomed in enough to locate them. There are some slight differences in the mags, though. Here's the data page for the event you listed that occurred at 10.49 local time, which I obtained by clicking the map after zooming in:

Earthquake Details

* This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 2.2
Date-Time

* Thursday, September 15, 2011 at 17:49:34 UTC
* Thursday, September 15, 2011 at 10:49:34 AM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 36.069°N, 114.790°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region NEVADA
Distances

* 17 km (10 miles) NNE (31°) from Boulder City, NV
* 22 km (13 miles) ENE (78°) from Henderson, NV
* 23 km (14 miles) E (97°) from East Las Vegas, NV
* 41 km (26 miles) ESE (110°) from Las Vegas, NV

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 1.7 km (1.1 miles); depth +/- 6.3 km (3.9 miles)
Parameters NST= 18, Nph= 16, Dmin=124 km, Rmss=0.23 sec, Gp=191°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=8
Source

* Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno

Event ID nn00348014

SOURCE: USGS

Anyway my wife is suffering from the ATS Widow Syndrome so I'm taking a break for a while.

ETA:
reply to post by OneisOne

Thank you! I'd appreciate that very much and I hope to get there one day and take you up on that. And if you ever get to Prague, let me know!

reply to post by onthelookout

Thank you also. But honestly, Kattrax was brilliant to come up with the idea for the thread and also, was always an amazing support to me. It's hard to put out serious predictions or even just lay some rather out-of-the-box ideas on the line but with her encouragement I felt able to do it. Making predictions is not a fun thing for me. It's gut-wrenching, most of the time... I lost a lot of sleep over most of them.

The amount of communication behind the scenes that went into some of our posts -- well, as some of you know if you've been here a while, we often chat to each other away from the threads. I encourage it as a way to thrash out ideas and even just talk over concerns without going too OT in threads.

Anyway I really must take a break from here for a while.

Mike

reply to post by onthelookout


Thanks for the info! Another great thread to try & find time for!!!

reply to post by westcoast


Nothing bad will happen until your news confirms a tropical storm that starts with 'H‘, when they name the storm ,1 or 2 days after that, a volcano will erupt, and after that, you need to pray, and I will also pray ,that I am dead wrong.

reply to post by JustMike


Hey,Mike,I just wanted to point out that here is a list of every tiny little shake in California.

All Earthquakes in California-Nevada Earthquakes recorded for the last week (168 hours). Times are local (PST or PDT). The most recent earthquakes are at the top of the list. Click on the word "map" or "MAP" to see a map displaying the earthquake. Click on an event "DATE" to get additional text information. Magnitude 3 and greater earthquakes are printed in bold type. The top three magnitude categories above magnitude 3 are in red. (For example 3,4,5 or 4,5,6, etc.)

www.data.scec.org...

reply to post by kdog1982


in response to:

Now ,I know this was dated Nov.18 of what year,I don't know.

In that content you posted it says 2010

Nov. 18 -- A multi-disciplinary team of researchers presented the world’s most advanced earthquake shaking simulation at the Supercomputing 2010 (SC10) conference this week in New Orleans. The research was selected as a finalist for the Gordon Bell Prize, awarded at the annual conference for outstanding achievement in high-performance computing applications. The “M8” simulation models how the ground will shake in a magnitude 8.0 earthquake on the southern San Andreas Fault. The simulation covers a larger area, in greater detail, than previously possible. Perhaps most importantly, the development of the M8 simulation advances the state-of-the-art in terms of the speed and efficiency at which such calculations can be performed.

Emphasis mine.

And that event was indeed from Nov 13-19 2010 in New Orleans.
Link

reply to post by JustMike

thank you dear ... i believe the 'tireds' are getting in my way. i just could not find them there no matter what i clicked ;(
all this activity sure isn't helping my insomnia any at all and now the days are starting to blend together
take care, share some hugs with the family and be well.

reply to post by daxpax


Thanks for that,daxpax!
I did catch that after I had posted it,it's just I had to many windows open with too much stuff .
I need to better check my postings.