It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by maskfan
I take it you aren't English.
.
That's not out of "1984",
Originally posted by seedofchucky
Originally posted by Raivan31
reply to post by Echtelion
What if a child done the same thing to their parent.
A wiser long term approach would have been for the mother to take care of the problem herself.
The practical implications of her decision mean that her daughter will have far fewer options in life.
The general public don't have to care but the mother should.
Wonder who's gonna pay legal costs?
The girl screwed up her own future the mother just helped teach her what consequences of her actions are
When i was young and stupid i don't remember rioting in the streets looting , smashing windows , and fighting law enforcement ?
if i had .. then why wouldn't i pay for my actions ?
Mother 1
Daughter 0
some ats members -1
Originally posted by JennaDarling
That is not how to parent.
All she did was hurt her athletic future.
That family going to have problems now, talk about causing a lifetime of hate and hurt in your own family.
Maybe if she set a better example as a mother she wouldnt be in that position.
edit on 15-8-2011 by JennaDarling because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Azdraik
Well, you do stupid things you pay the piper. Also remember we are not talking about a 10 year old kid. We are talking about a 18 year old adult.
If the girl did not know she could get in trouble for this then she doesn't need to be in any dam committee making decisions.
Originally posted by Echtelion
Originally posted by maskfan
I take it you aren't English.
.
I sooo proudly ain't, indeed... especially judging by the level of "understanding" Britons like you have of their broken-down society.
But really, the relevance of being English or not is void...
Everywhere there are loyal slaves who'd rather point the blame on all the ones underneath them rather than making the real crooks accountable for their mess, and that includes Her Majesty as well as her corporate network at the City of London. I am no longer surprised by it. After all, isn't a punishable "crime" to address the crimes of authorities as well, in this great civilized society, just like that whistleblower who got murdered under Kingpin Murdoch's command?
Under a criminal rule, remaining in your house during a revolt is being complicit in the crime, even though you are not profiteering from it.
If you think this riot wasn't "political" enough, what did YOU do into it, to make it more politically intelligible?edit on 15/8/11 by Echtelion because: (no reason given)