It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wow you got a blog and an un-named source.
Crack journalism at its best.
Hey, I read on a blog the other day that someone who asked to not be named thinks bat-boy has a poor understanding of quantum physics.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Odd how the 'smartest' man to sit in the Oval Office for years (at least that's what we have been told repeatedly), is described as "moronic" by members of his own party.
I hope this doesn't cast a pall over Harvard's educational abilities.
another depression
Originally posted by butcherguy
Personally, I liked the Bush era economy better than the way it is now.
Oh, no doubt, there is always a delay in changes in the economy following changes in economic policy, that's the way things work. The question has always been, how long is that delay. I don't believe there is a set answer for that. Some policy changes cause an immediate effect on the economy, however those same policy changes can have an opposite long-term effect, mostly due to the stock market, IMO.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by butcherguy
Personally, I liked the Bush era economy better than the way it is now.
He "inherited" a positive economy from Clinton.
Then trashed it.
Did you know about the fuzzy math of Bush's expenses? The war(s) is not included.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by butcherguy
Personally, I liked the Bush era economy better than the way it is now.
He "inherited" a positive economy from Clinton.
Then trashed it.
Did you know about the fuzzy math of Bush's expenses? The war(s) is not included.
Originally posted by butcherguy
There's been fuzzy math in government as long as there's been paper and ink.