It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Russh50
Try being in your twenties in this day and age and see how easy it is to find a good job you can go and make a living in. It's not easy, even with an education.
Privileges granted by the sovereign (governments) in their capacity to license (condone) what might otherwise be illegal are always taxable and regulatable. Rights such as those envisioned by the founding fathers are not taxable or regulatable because they are exercises of the common right that could be completely destroyed by government through taxation and/or regulation. These are maxims of law so well established that they are irrefutable. For example, look to Frost & Frost Trucking v. Railroad Commission of California, 271 U.S. 583, 70 L.Ed. 1101 (1925).
The privileges and immunities [civil rights] of the 14th Amendment citizens were derived [taken] from....the Constitution, but are not identical to those referred to in Article IV, sect. 2 of the Constitution [which recognizes the existence of state Citizens who were not citizens of the United States because there was no such animal in 1787]. Plainly spoken, RIGHTS considered to be grants from our creator are clearly different from the "civil rights" that were granted by Congress to its own brand of franchised citizen in the 14th Amendment.
How state Citizens were converted into federal citizens;
In order for the federal government to tax a Citizen of one of the several states, it had to create some sort of contractual nexus. This contractual nexus is the Social Security Number (SSN).
In 1935, the federal government instituted Social Security. The Social Security Board then created 10 Social Security "Districts." The combination of these "Districts" resulted in a "Federal Area", a fictional jurisdiction, which covered all of the several states like a clear plastic overlay.
In 1939, the federal government instituted the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939." This Act is a municipal law of the District of Columbia for taxing all federal government employees and those who live and work in any "Federal Area." Now the government knows it cannot tax those state Citizens who live and work outside the territorial jurisdiction of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 2 in the Constitution for the United States of America; also known as the ten square miles of the District of Columbia and territories and enclaves. So, in 1940, Congress passed the "Buck Act" now found in 4 U.S.C. Sections 105-113. In Section 110(e), this Act authorized any department of the federal government to create a "Federal Area" for imposition of the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939." This tax is imposed at 4 U.S.C. Section 111. The rest of the taxing law is found in the Internal Revenue Code. The Social Security Board had already created a "Federal Area" overlay. U.S.C. Title 4 is as follows:
Sec. 110(d): The term "State" includes any territory or possession of the United States.
Sec. 110(e): The term "Federal Area" means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United states or any department, establishment, or agency of the United states; and any federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a federal area located within such State.
Originally posted by shtf2012
Yes thats right the Tea Party is to blame for all this mess.
Or....is that what they want you to believe.
After enduring the sanity depriving media blitz.
Thinking right, then left, sitting on the fence then falling off.
I am beginning to believe that the good old boys are in fact scared to death of the Tea Party.
That in fact if we do default, it is a false flag event to discredit the Tea Party.
You see the Tea Party while being under the guise of the Republican party.
Could become a third independent party unto it self very easily.
This is what has them shaking in their boots.
We have seen a number of mainstream Republicans latch on to the Tea Party.
I think in an attempt to corrupt it.
But it's not working.
While for me the Tea Party leans a little too far to the right.
I have been trying to think objectively about this.
Thinking of the debt crisis in this way is the only way it makes sense.
What do you think?
Originally posted by EmVeeFF
reply to post by shtf2012
A third party is really the only conformist hope we have to change the govt. direction, but I'm not really sure how that would play out considering how elections have been run the last few decades...
Originally posted by shtf2012
Yes thats right the Tea Party is to blame for all this mess.
Or....is that what they want you to believe.
Originally posted by shtf2012
Yes thats right the Tea Party is to blame for all this mess.
Or....is that what they want you to believe.
After enduring the sanity depriving media blitz.
Thinking right, then left, sitting on the fence then falling off.
I am beginning to believe that the good old boys are in fact scared to death of the Tea Party.
That in fact if we do default, it is a false flag event to discredit the Tea Party.
You see the Tea Party while being under the guise of the Republican party.
Could become a third independent party unto it self very easily.
This is what has them shaking in their boots.
We have seen a number of mainstream Republicans latch on to the Tea Party.
I think in an attempt to corrupt it.
But it's not working.
While for me the Tea Party leans a little too far to the right.
I have been trying to think objectively about this.
Thinking of the debt crisis in this way is the only way it makes sense.
What do you think?
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by shtf2012
Nah it's to blame obama. The majority of American people won't see this as the Tea Party's doing they will see it is Obama because they won't recall what the cause of the direct effects were they will just see the effects and see who is sitting as president.
That is what this whole thing has been about. It is why republicans raised the debt ceiling 19 times with the last president but not now. They are doing it because they know it's terrible but it will make people want the dems out.