It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by wdkirk
....is this the meeting for Brother's and Sister's of Christ?
That's what the thread title said, but after clicking the link and reading the first page of replies it appears to be an anti-Christian circle jerk.
Or it may be a well-considered reaction to someone using a public forum as a pulpit (and if not blind knowing the consequences from the start).
Originally posted by wdkirk
reply to post by MamaJ
I am not an atheist.
I don't need a 10 minutes video to save me.
Originally posted by Hydroman
Originally posted by MamaJ
The Christians message.... "Believe in Jesus, do not go to hell my friend....I love you and so does Jesus".
The Atheist's message...."You are stupid ....go to hell I dont care where we spend eternity because there isn't one".
"Believe in Jesus", simple as that? Believe in Santa. Believe in Bigfoot. It's really not that simple.
I love you too Sugar Britches, and I don't need a god to in order to do so.
The atheist's message is "you are stupid, go to hell....etc.?" Sure, some atheists will call you stupid. Some christians will call me stupid. I used to attend a church where the pastor spoke about agnostic people and called them ignorant. But generally, all being an atheist means is that you don't believe gods exist. Now, anything more than that it is just an individual's independent perception.
I'll be honest, I would love to have a life after this one, but I see no reason to believe there is one. I'm not going to invest in a belief system that touts an afterlife just because it gives me some kind of hope and comfort, not knowing for sure whether or not it's true.
I want to believe in the most true things possible, and the least amount of false things as possible. I care about what I believe in.edit on 29-7-2011 by Hydroman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Hydroman
People die for other people every day, and they don't have to. If you had a chance to save everyone in the whole world with your life, would you do it? If not, are you saying there is no one here on this planet who would do it, when there are people putting there lives on the line everyday, sometimes just to save ONE person. Look at firefighters, police officers, etc.
Originally posted by chrissiel123
He did it as an act of sacrifice - to save everyone else. that is not something anyone else would do.
...and if the Koran is right, you have a lot to lose.
Originally posted by MamaJ
If the Bible is "right" about Hell....well then you may have a lot to lose.
Originally posted by windword
As far as Jesus dying for us.....that's already been answered, imo.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
I think he was referring to what Hydroman said about it.
I think Jesus died for our sake. He lived a sinless life and could have gone straight to heaven without dying.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
Why do you think you will go to heaven and an atheist, not?
Originally posted by Hydroman
People die for other people every day, and they don't have to. If you had a chance to save everyone in the whole world with your life, would you do it? If not, are you saying there is no one here on this planet who would do it, when there are people putting there lives on the line everyday, sometimes just to save ONE person. Look at firefighters, police officers, etc.
Originally posted by chrissiel123
He did it as an act of sacrifice - to save everyone else. that is not something anyone else would do.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
Why do you think you will go to heaven and an atheist, not?
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by wdkirk
....is this the meeting for Brother's and Sister's of Christ?
That's what the thread title said, but after clicking the link and reading the first page of replies it appears to be an anti-Christian circle jerk.
Or it may be a well-considered reaction to someone using a public forum as a pulpit (and if not blind knowing the consequences from the start).
I hear ya man! I've tried numerous times to explain to folks that just because this is a Religion, Faith, and Theology forum doesn't mean we can have threads about Religion, Faith, or Theology.
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
I think he was referring to what Hydroman said about it.
I think Jesus died for our sake. He lived a sinless life and could have gone straight to heaven without dying.
Your just rambling. Are there any atheists you Don't stick up for? Just feeding you, since you want to be feededit on 30-7-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)edit on 30-7-2011 by RealTruthSeeker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
Why do you think you will go to heaven and an atheist, not?
"But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction."
2 Peter 2:1
According to the Bible, is what I meant. I don't think there is a scientific proof. If people wonder about Jesus, they would know about that person, Jesus from the Bible. If someone believed there was an actual man as described, it would be because of a certain confidence that this book was not just a fabricated hoax but a compilation of writings by men throughout history, writing what they believed to be accurate and true. Besides Jesus, there are many other characters in the Bible, an early one was Enoch who lived before the flood. It was said of him that he walked with the Lord, indicating a life of holiness, and then was gone and no one could find him, with the inference that God had taken him up.
You're saying, "he didn't have to die. He could have gone straight to heaven." Prove it! I don't believe you. Nobody gets out of here alive. Not even Jesus.
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
Why do you think you will go to heaven and an atheist, not?
"But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction."
2 Peter 2:1
Relating to OP, where the 'world hates' christians, it seems to me, that you have extended this to be christians 'hating' christians, by introducing a direction of who the "TRUE christians" are, with it's long and probably never-ending heresy-fights/quibbles etc.
Once more demonstrating the authoritarian aspect of some christian subsets.
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by wdkirk
....is this the meeting for Brother's and Sister's of Christ?
That's what the thread title said, but after clicking the link and reading the first page of replies it appears to be an anti-Christian circle jerk.
Or it may be a well-considered reaction to someone using a public forum as a pulpit (and if not blind knowing the consequences from the start).
I hear ya man! I've tried numerous times to explain to folks that just because this is a Religion, Faith, and Theology forum doesn't mean we can have threads about Religion, Faith, or Theology.
And I have answered, that .......independent of anything being presented based on science/logic procedure or from a faith perpective........a public forum isn't a sheltered place for propaganda. It's a dialogue-mode.
Case A:
1: "It's true, because".
2: "It's not true, because".
Case B:
1: "It's true, because my truth-seeking method says so"
2: "It's not true, because MY truth-seeking method says so"
Case C:
1: "It's true, because my truth-seeking method is validated"
2: "It's not true, because my truth-seeking method is BETTER validated"
Eventually this SHOULD lead us to epistemology, which it never does.
In the meantime, until we possibly arrive to epistemology, more or less simplistic to sophisticated arguments from cases A to C will manifest, and compressed it will sound: Is, isn't, is, isn't......
There's as much a right to say "yes", as there is to say "no", so let's once and for all get rid of all those disguised efforts of censorship, which rest on a "persecution"-gambit and similar tactical maneuvers (and with similar I also include possible efforts from the opposition of religious missioning to even hint at censorship).
If someone says (a specified) 'hallelujah', I can (topic-related to the specific 'hallelujah') say "bosh" in a way not transgressing manners and decorum. And vice versa.