It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by N1thNa1ath
reply to post by the2010apprentice
May be the different angle you mentioned, had to be related with some change in the precession of the equinoxes? i mean what if what we understand as beeing solid science is coming to a time when everything is debatable?
i`m in Argentina, South America and the sun comes out in a totally different place than it used to, even my wife noticed that before than me, and i really had no aswers to give her.
May be an incoming ice age is closer than we think and the consequence of the sun moving in a different path or slightly farther is causing it.
Really don`t know.
Originally posted by AlexIR
I am sorry but i have to ask you, are you stupid? Is your IQ lower than a monkeys?
If not read along:
As i remember THE SUN does NOT move arround THE EARTH and if i remember correctly its THE OTHER WAY ARROUND.... and it has been so for the last .... ok forever ..
So think next time before making such a claim as the sun moved ... because remember ... earth moves ...
Originally posted by ZIPMATT
Originally posted by ZIPMATT
Originally posted by DriftingAway
reply to post by ZIPMATT
If the sun stayed in place for an extra day, the earth would have stopped rotating.
Had the earth done the impossible and suddenly stopped rotating, all the people on the surface would continue to travel eastward at speeds up to 1000 miles per hour and go flying. Those near the equator would have traveled the fastest. The only people that would have survived would have lived at the frozen poles.
"Would not a sudden stop by the earth , rotating at over 100 miles an hour at its equator, mean a complete destructionof the world ? Since the world survived, there must have been a mecghanism to cushion tye slowing down of terrestrial rotation , if it really occureed, or another escape for the energy of motion besides transformation to heat, or both . Or if rotation persisted undisturbed, the terrestrial axis may have tilted in the presence of a strong magnetic field , so theat the sun appeared to lose its diurnal movement. These problems are kept in sight and are faced in the epilogue of this volume " - from "Worlds In Collision" Immanuel Velikovsky
Questions answered here : "Or if rotation persisted undisturbed, the terrestial axis may have tilted in the presence of a strong magnetic field , so that the sun appeared to lose its diurnal movement "
I think its less of a sudden tide than you anticipate. Velikovsky clearly felt the 'presence of a strong magnetic field' was a possible explanation . I am inclined to agree , the argument carries weight and i will contribute towards it . What is your take on the 'presence'
Originally posted by Justoneman
Ok, I am still not off my fence about this. I too am leaning away from "it is so". However, I have noticed a theme here about things not being lined up as before. Well what about this theory, newly thought up? We could be seing shifts in the earths crust from the magma being closer to the surface in the ready to break out mode. We are seing what I feel is an unprecedented # of volcano's above the seal level spewing. Not to mention any under the sea level. Perhaps we are seeing the affects of a slippery crust lubricated in a way we have not experienced this iteration of super civilization and maybe instead of sliding east-west it is some other angle? I wouldn't discount someones observations based on my beliefs in the rotation or precession issues just yet folks, though I am about there myself.
Originally posted by ZIPMATT
reply to post by kdog1982
. And I know when I am not on the way back. They have written in function i think ; that if the sat detects stopped ; it now has a temporary shutdown and stays stopped. Switching it off and on catches it out bit , but is now nearly unusable on pedestrian basis .