It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LUXUS
Another picture from Egyptian family album " Pharaoh presents the afrocentrists with beautifully crafted necklace as a thanks for helping to build the pyramids"
Map showing king tuts dna to be of European origin
edit on 2-8-2011 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)
I stand by my pyra , the consonants used would be p-r the r being a sun heiroglyph which would sound like ra or ray insted of a lion heiroglyph which would sound like ru. Anyways this is just silly semantics they all come down to mean the palace of the Shekem/pharoah.
The hyksos never got into upper khemet which is in the south which was controlled by the Thebans so no , this is false
Wrong again I notice you spelling the hyksos as hykosis (and i'm confused) , hope you are speaking about the same people. Anyway the word hyksos or heqa khasewet as the khemetians called them means "foreign ruler" or "ruler from a foregn land" in khemetian. They were not native khemetians , they were not black. Google up hyksos and you will see in all khemetian depictians they were not black but asiatic , even their names indicated they had syrian backgrounds , possibly pheonecia.
I still stand by the true name of aegypt being khemet because it was , it was used to name the land of all egypt not just the nile delta , but what other name will you tell me it was i'd like to know , if it's mizraim that is it's asiatic name not it's native name.
edit on 1-8-2011 by De La Valletta because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2012srb
King Tut Was Caucasian - Suck It Up
Can't say I'm surprised.
Bone structure tells all.
Akhenaten's skull is distinctly Caucasoid.
He was Tutankhamen's father.
Any more questions?
Didn't think so.edit on 8/2/2011 by 2012srb because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by thePharaoh
Caucasian encompasses Europeans, Middle Easterners, East Indians.
They have a very specific bone structure.
All you have to see is the skull to identify a Caucasoid.
Originally posted by LUXUS
Another picture from Egyptian family album " Pharaoh presents the afrocentrists with beautifully crafted necklace as a thanks for helping to build the pyramids"
Map showing king tuts dna to be of European origin
edit on 2-8-2011 by LUXUS because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by thePharaoh
Caucasian encompasses Europeans, Middle Easterners, East Indians.
They have a very specific bone structure.
All you have to see is the skull to identify a Caucasoid.
Originally posted by 2012srb
King Tut Was Caucasian - Suck It Up
Can't say I'm surprised.
Bone structure tells all.
Akhenaten's skull is distinctly Caucasoid.
He was Tutankhamen's father.
Any more questions?
Didn't think so.edit on 8/2/2011 by 2012srb because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by thePharaoh
Nubia is nowhere in this picture.
You are grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to resuscitate a dying argument.
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
For centuries, Eurocentric scholars have rejected the idea that Ancient Egypt was formed and ruled by Black Africans. Today we are commonly taught as a fact that Ancient Egyptian people had olive/brownish skin (like Queen Cleopatra, yet she was Greek...) and that their slaves were Black Africans. Also, it is almost ingrained in our brains that Black Africans have never really had the audacity to maintain a vast civilization due to the simple fact we see and are taught that all they did was dance around, make music and hardly bothered to form an organised society.
This video which will no doubt be extremely controversial to you as it explains how Black Africans were apparently denied the right to have formed and maintained Ancient Egypts due to western scholars wanting a "European Superior" view of history (like the Romans particularly) in the past.
Based on the evidence what do you think?
edit on 25-7-2011 by CasiusIgnoranze because: .
Originally posted by John_Rodger_Cornman
mitocondrial DNA, X or Y chromosome can only accurately tell you were your ancesters came from and your breeding history.
What are you trying to say? These snp mutations make groups excel at certain feats?
Let's get back to what biology says about natural selection. If humans are one of the weakest if not weakest animals in nature(pound for pound)and slowest.
Why did we survive as long as we did? We almost went extinct in africa. We human hominids were just 10,000-5,000 in number. The other hominids starved. But we didn't. Why? It wasn't because we where faster/stronger/quicker than them. Why didn't we not starve like they did?
We can't swim very well nor can we climb trees,have venom,horns,2 less legs(less mobile),smaller, and ridiculously long infant incubation(2/3 of a year) nor can we see well at night time or
Why did we survive and other better physically stronger,faster,quicker organisms went extinct(like the other hominids)?
If European humans are biologistically better equipped then why do they only make up 12% of the population of the world? Asian humans make up 60%. Africans humans make up 15%+.
Why? If Africans are a failed brand of hominid human why do they out number Europeans? These failures should just die out like all the other failures in nature right? But we don't. Why is that?
There are no superior humans. Superiority is a myth. We do get fat pretty easily. (1/7 of the world is overweight).