It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This bill only serves to sanction the status quo by putting forth a $1 trillion budget deficit and authorizing a $2.4 trillion increase in the debt limit.
Finally, this bill authorizes a $2.4 trillion rise in the debt limit. I have never voted for a debt ceiling increase and I never will. Increasing the debt ceiling is an endorsement of business as usual in Washington. It delays the inevitable, the day that one day will come when we cannot continue to run up enormous deficits and will be forced to pay our bills.
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I sympathize with the aims of this bill’s sponsors, I must vote against HR 2560. It is my hope, however, that the looming debt ceiling deadline and the discussion surrounding the budget will further motivate us to consider legislation in the near future that will make meaningful cuts and long-lasting reforms.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
this is what i always argued about the bill. You still will have $1 Trillion in defect spending a year if the bill passed. It doesent fix anything!
edit on 20-7-2011 by camaro68ss because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Much of that deficit was caused by the wars in iraq and afghanistan and low taxes. Now that the wars had ended and scaled back and spending expected to be less, the deficit CAN BE CUT,edit on 20-7-2011 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no reason given)
Third, the Act applies the nonsensical narrative about a “Global War on Terror” to justify exceptions to its spending caps. Since this war is undeclared, has no definite enemies, no clear objectives, and no metric to determine victory, it is by definition endless. Congress will never balance the budget until we reject the concept of endless wars.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
I fully agree that the fed should be dismantled and very much economic pains to be endured as well corrections done to our financial systems, but WE NEED those loans to reactivate and reset the economy while we still can, with better restructuring and rational budget, that deficit CAN be cut further with increased earnings and revenue later..
edit on 20-7-2011 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no reason given)
But everybody is so political, so focused on holding their job for the next year, that the discussion in Washington is nauseating. And I’m saying it bluntly, that this administration is the greatest wet blanket to business and progress and job creation in my lifetime. And I could prove it and I could spend the next three hours giving you examples of all of us in this marketplace that are frightened to death about all the new regulations, our healthcare costs escalate, regulations coming from left and right, a President that seems — that keeps using that word redistribution.
Originally posted by robyn
Not to derail the tread but I sincerely doubt that "those loans" will do anthing but increase the size of government and encourage regulatory agaencies to promulgate regulations that in effect enact laws that firther stifle the public sector.