It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by semperkill
Go to the ENRICKS sight hit the picture of the oriental girl keep clicking through the picture will distort keep clicking the picture. That is weird but definatly a clue definatly.....
Well the world is a dangerous place don't you agree.
Originally posted by shadow12
ok i just translated another Q&A (AND THIS ONE IS INTERESTING)!!!
Q:How can you ensure that nobody runs any danger if the end of the world is a possibility?
A:We can ensure that nobody is in danger of us. As for all the dangerous remainder in this world, bring one
(they said no one is in danger of US!)
Originally posted by AKA23
reply to post by klhix
I'm not sure what trolling is but I certainly agree that "click on this, click on that, download this, download that" is no way conducive to critical thinking. I've followed this for a couple of days now. Read all the posts here and at 8.3.11. Been to more tangential sites than I can count. Been sent on so many wild goose chases to so many really fun, weird and and fascinating sites...
But the flexibility and endurance of the logic that can continue and try to make a connection between what's actually on 8.3.11 and the holocaust, Casey Anthony, hackers, crackers, movie premiers, Hitler, video games, AIDS, the Nephilim, or people being sacrificed for their blood is wondrous to behold. Real art. It should be an Olympic sport.
The first brain-storming that produced these kind of investigations was needfull and had purpose. These connections have, so far, failed. Instead of picking up the ball and looking deeper or elsewhere, a lot of us are stomping over the same tired ground, in some cases gleefully hysterical, almost agresively impressionable. There's a fun mystery here that might have some import. (Probably not but what the heck.) Reading over and over again the same posts re-phrased by new viewers is like watching endless re-runs of "Laverne and Shirley".
My mother would have been 83 on the day I found this thread. The first time I ran down the importance of her birth date to 8.3.11, it might be informative in that there may actually be a connection or it may be possible to falsify that connection. But endless repitions of scarce, dead-end, facts would quickly become useless and counter-productive. If I came up with some new facts to illustrate the connection, there would be some value.
Please read the posts.
Thank you so much to everyone who's brought something new to the table or in some way moved the discussion along. You are stalwarts and I admire your tenacity. And thanks for all the great sites I've been sent to. Even dead-ins can be magnificently informative.