It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ross 54
At least three different university-based labs have either undertaken or been willing to undertake the analysis of the Roswell metal. I'm inclined to suppose that most universities receive some federal funding these days.So, does this rule out at least one of the above scenarios? Comments, anyone? Rossedit on 28-9-2011 by Ross 54 because: added information
Originally posted by Ross 54
Humans have been using iron for over three thousand years. My car is made of iron. Wouldn't you think that three thousand years of technological advancement would mean that it should be made of something more remarkable; more 'up-to-date' ?
Glad to hear from you again, Frank. How is the retesting of the metal fragments you found at the Roswell crash site going? Many of us are still very interested in the outcome. Ross
Originally posted by ICAND
reply to post by Logical one
Go here www.presidentialufo.com... and read the article.
In fact I would recommend reading all of Wilbert Smiths stuff. If there is any truth in what he says then the
ET spacecraft material is made of the same stuff we use on earth; its just harder material but the same elements. No exotic alloys, same elements, same combinations, just metallugically different. Keep in mind that
Wilbert Smith talked about really hard alloys long before it was mentioned that the Roswell material could not be scratched with a knife. A few others scientists and government folks have also hinted that the material is hard and looks like aluminum. You know the old saying if it looks like a rose and smells like a rose it must be a rose.
Rosey aluminum, what a concept.
Originally posted by ICAND
In fact I would recommend reading all of Wilbert Smiths stuff. If there is any truth in what he says then the
ET spacecraft material is made of the same stuff we use on earth; its just harder material but the same elements. No exotic alloys, same elements, same combinations, just metallugically different.
Originally posted by ICAND
In fact I would recommend reading all of Wilbert Smiths stuff. If there is any truth in what he says then the
ET spacecraft material is made of the same stuff we use on earth; its just harder material but the same elements. No exotic alloys, same elements, same combinations, just metallugically different.
Originally posted by Ross 54
I reasoned that a handwritten letter is unusual enough these days to draw more interest, and likelier to receive a response, than one email from a stranger, among what could be a recent deluge of these, sent to Frank Kimbler. Ross
Originally posted by Ross 54
Those are just two of the many possible explanations of the current state of affairs. From what I've learned of Frank Kimbler, I very much doubt he'd fail to report that new test results indicated a mundane origin for the aluminum fragments he found. From the very start he has said that he could have extraterrestrial artifacts, or, as he puts it, 'Mr. Rancher's beer can'. Ross
Originally posted by Ross 54
I merely gave one possible example, of many, of what humans might contribute to galactic civilization. I don't think it unreasonable to conclude that a sense of hearing is likely possessed by many galactic species. There is an order and pattern to music that might well be appreciated by any thinking beings that can perceive it. Birds are separated from humans by millions of years of divergent evolution, yet humans can still enjoy bird songs. Ross
Frank Kimbler may have neither found that his metal fragments are extraterrestrial, or that they are mundane, so would be in no position to be shouting the former, or admitting, perhaps begrudgingly, the latter. The initial tests gave somewhat ambiguous results. If more tests have not been done yet, the results must still be ambiguous. This was, of course, the whole point of doing more tests, and with great care; to remove the element of uncertainty. Ross
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Ross 54
Those are just two of the many possible explanations of the current state of affairs. From what I've learned of Frank Kimbler, I very much doubt he'd fail to report that new test results indicated a mundane origin for the aluminum fragments he found. From the very start he has said that he could have extraterrestrial artifacts, or, as he puts it, 'Mr. Rancher's beer can'. Ross
Let's put it this way......If Kimbler has indeed found ET artefacts then he would be shouting from the roof tops.......If it's Mr. Rancher's beer can.......Kimbler may well tell us that too........its just that he probably might put the release of that news on a much slower back burner.....If you get my drift.edit on 26-10-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ross 54
Frank Kimbler may have neither found that his metal fragments are extraterrestrial, or that they are mundane, so would be in no position to be shouting the former, or admitting, perhaps begrudgingly, the latter. The initial tests gave somewhat ambiguous results. If more tests have not been done yet, the results must still be ambiguous. This was, of course, the whole point of doing more tests, and with great care; to remove the element of uncertainty. Ross
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Ross 54
Those are just two of the many possible explanations of the current state of affairs. From what I've learned of Frank Kimbler, I very much doubt he'd fail to report that new test results indicated a mundane origin for the aluminum fragments he found. From the very start he has said that he could have extraterrestrial artifacts, or, as he puts it, 'Mr. Rancher's beer can'. Ross
Let's put it this way......If Kimbler has indeed found ET artefacts then he would be shouting from the roof tops.......If it's Mr. Rancher's beer can.......Kimbler may well tell us that too........its just that he probably might put the release of that news on a much slower back burner.....If you get my drift.edit on 26-10-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)edit on 1-11-2011 by Ross 54 because: (no reason given)edit on 1-11-2011 by Ross 54 because: corrected word choice