It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I oppose the whole thing. This just highlights the one absurdity of the system.
Originally posted by niceguybob
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
Are you serious?
Your worried about how she spends dough AFTER she receives it?
I agree with that even though I am fairly sure you are being sarcastic.
Originally posted by niceguybobI've been paying into SS since I was 13 years old. My statement clearly states I've paid in the maximum to receive a check that has now been postponed until I'm 67.
Give me back my money,no interest,and we'll call it even.
OK..How about, stop with holding that money from my check and we'll call it even?
There are many terms I could use to describe this system. Most are not permitted under the T&C.
Originally posted by nunya13
"redistribution"?
Nice with the rhetoric. Dysphemism much?
Given the current situation, I seriously doubt there will be SS system in 20 years when I could "hypothetically" collect. Given the choice, I would opt out now. They will never give me that choice though.
Originally posted by nunya13Call it what you want. But what the heck do you think you would do on SSI? Are you keeping track of what you're putting in? You should! Because, according to you, you should only get to take out what you put in. That means that when and if you ever receive SSI you should decline the next check after you have received your share. Then what are you going to do?
Originally posted by nunya13
reply to post by sonofliberty1776
Cry and whine all you want about "socialism" but you'll be singing a different tune if you were to ever see what would happen if these people were suddenly left penniless.
This isn't just about some "poor, lazy" people not getting their "free ride" next month...
Originally posted by nunya13"slipped a disc"? Yeah, my mom slipped a disc recently. She also has sipped four others and now has six vertebrae fused in her back and now has to have them fused in her neck!
'Heal Thyself!" Are you serious?
Wow...just wow..
Some of you come up with the strangest arguments to justify your non-compassion and hatred for the weak.
The Court ruled that no such contract exists, and that there is no contractual right to receive Social Security payments. Payments due under Social Security are not “property” rights and are not protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The interest of a beneficiary of Social Security is protected only by the Due Process Clause.
He appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling, the Court rejected this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right.