It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

PICTURE OF BOB [HOAX]

page: 5
15
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


Because we want to decide ourselves. You know, this is a conspiracy forum, and you fuel some bad thoughts about ATS.

Some said that the camera could never make only a few photos until the batteries are empty. I´ve got one, which bahaves the same way, 15 - 20 shots and I need new batteries.

The point with his leg: he´s running, look at some running pictures on the net, this is quite possible.

There are a few other arguments against the BOB picture, which are not worthy to mention


I do not say, that I believe it´s real, but I don´t see the hoax.

The exif data.. I wanna see it.
And I want a statemant from Andrew on it.

Till then, no proof against and no proof pro.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:00 PM
link   
LOL

I cannot believe how much attention this thread got. This site is like a live comedy novel.
Hopefully people will have learn to be more skeptical and less gullible next time.

One can hope, right?
edit on 8-7-2011 by Bixxi3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Numino
 


This analysis is the proof: Gray Bob

"Bob" shows no ambient color inherent in the scene, as well as no color noise typical of neutral-colors taken with an inexpensive digital camera in a low-light situation.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Numino
 


This has already been proven to be a hoax.

Just telling you know.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Obviously a hoax, the exif data has been removed, or is missing in vast parts as well.

Apparently that was done on purpose.

-------------------------snip--------------------------
[email protected]:~$ jhead /home/root/Desktop/erlobl.jpg
Header missing JFIF marker
File name : /home/root/Desktop/erlobl.jpg
File size : 10489 bytes
File date : 2011:07:08 15:54:18
Resolution : 618 x 479
-------------------------snip--------------------------

I'm positively surprised about the effort the ATS administration took to verify the issue at hand.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
I'm positively surprised about the effort the ATS administration took to verify the issue at hand.


Me too.

I know they have a lot of things to do behind the scenes but I would absolutely welcome such an approach in the future for threads of this nature.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:07 PM
link   
 




 



Kindly refrain from removing staff edits.



edit on 7/8/2011 by maria_stardust because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Forevever
The picture might be a hoax, but I still believe Andrew

I'm entitled to my wrong opinion

edit on 8-7-2011 by Forevever because: my other post was funnier though, but I'll stay on topic


Ahhh...

Forevever, you do realise some people have nothing better to do and actually enjoy the attention they receive from creating threads like this?



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie


-------------------------snip--------------------------
[email protected]:~$ jhead /home/root/Desktop/erlobl.jpg
Header missing JFIF marker
File name : /home/root/Desktop/erlobl.jpg
File size : 10489 bytes
File date : 2011:07:08 15:54:18
Resolution : 618 x 479
-------------------------snip--------------------------




Can you explain what this means and how it shows the photo was a hoax? not very savvy in that area.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Death_Kron
 

I also realize there is no such thing as proof in this forum
or anywhere for that matter - so its not a dig at ATS
its a dig at people.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Well...there goes "Bob"...that was the funniest thing I have seen on ATS in awhile!

I can't believe peoples feelings are actually hurt because it is a hoax...oh well...we all live and learn!


There will be more "Bob's"...and there will be more believers...until then...that one was pretty good!



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Im Glad this is in the hoax bin were it belongs.
I bet alot of gullible people feel pretty stupid for believing in BOB now.
And I cant believe people are still trying to defend the OP and his lie.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Forevever
reply to post by Death_Kron
 

I also realize there is no such thing as proof in this forum
or anywhere for that matter - so its not a dig at ATS
its a dig at people.


We do now have proof though.

Proof that the OP was lying...



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Death_Kron
 

You missed the point
I digress
unsub



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by Advantage
 


Mod's are allowed to participate as members?


Well, yeah, of course. They are members.... Members who were given the opportunity to volunteer.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by gimme_some_truth

Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by Advantage
 


Mod's are allowed to participate as members?


Well, yeah, of course. They are members.... Members who were given the opportunity to volunteer.


I know mate, was joking



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
This is a hoax.

The "humanoid" image does not share any of the natural greenish light of the surround scene, it's a gray human-form shape added in post-processing.





As you can see, even when increasing the saturation on the scene, the gray shape still exhibits no color attributes other than some minor color in the JPEG compression artifacts. And even when the image is rotated through the "color wheel" in 90-degree increments by altering the hue, the "humanoid" shows no color changes.

Hoax.
edit on 8-7-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)



I dont quite understand this explanation. Are you saying that since Bob is not green like the trees and grass in the picture and his skin doesnt reflect the green these trees have its a fake?

thats what im getting from your evaluation. If I am understanding that wrong Im sorry and would love a clearer explanation if possible



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:47 PM
link   
Good to see the truth finally come out.

It was a hoot though.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
The thread author has been banned.


Thank the ATS gods.

I know some people really get a kick out of the troll army that has befallen our lovely cyber home...but not me. I just want to see each and every single one of them banned and sent back to the site they belong to.

Thanks for debunking this stupid hoax and tossing the offender out on his lying backside. Keeping the place clean!

MM
edit on 8-7-2011 by Mr Mask because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by readytorevolt
I dont quite understand this explanation. Are you saying that since Bob is not green like the trees and grass in the picture and his skin doesnt reflect the green these trees have its a fake?

Yes.

There is a green ambience in the entire scene that any object, regardless of color, will inherit to some degree. It's the way light and digital cameras work.




top topics



 
15
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join