Welcome Hussein, I'm happy to have you join, I have nothing against you, but you used some fallacies I couldn't let stand. Just because we point out
the truth about Islam doesn't mean we hate, that's like saying if we don't support Obama we're racist. It's not the Koran that has caused many of the
problems, though it has, it's mostly the Sunnah that results in the problems. First off, Muhammed ordered all dogs to be killed because they were
unclean, keeping Gabriel from visiting him, the people didn't like this, so he said work dogs were fine but absolutely all black dogs must be killed
because basically they were demons, a common myth (they'd lead you to the desert and get you lost and kill you). So Muhammed was wrong and his people
rebuked his absurdity so he had to change, sure makes you wonder how much the Koran is the "word of god" if the prophet has to go back on his word.
It's like the pope that said no one went to heaven till their bodies got taken up with Jesus' Second Coming, so everyone was mad that they had been
praying to saints not yet in heaven. So the pope had to change his mind, so much for being God's mouthpiece. It's not that we have some particular
problem with Islam, it's that we have a particular problem with all ignorant religions where you give your power away to some former alien, an alien
who happened to be a terrible person. The most obvious is that when Muhammed died, your religion was immediately split into two warring factions (who
are still in a Cold War), all over who took over the throne, M's son or #1 super fan. That sums up religion perfectly, it was obviously the same with
Protestants and Catholics in Europe and Ireland is a great example of modern Christian extremists.
Religion is all about control, though there are quality Eastern philosophies and even Sufis have a good understanding, that's why Islam at first gave
women more rights, but is now used to keep them enslaved in a hilghly patriarchal society. Islam suffers the same problems as Chrisitianity, except
Muhammed made it easier than Jesus to screw up the religions, but for both it was the early fanatic followers that ruined it for everyone. Though
Muhammed immediately going to war to conquer gave them a big head start. It's just like how Constantine turned the cross into a sword, first oppressed
Christians, then made Christianity the official religion and eventually oppressed non-Christians and used the religion as an excuse to go to war with
other nations. I could go on and on, but my main point is this: just because you're apart of some deeply flawed institution, doesn't make us hateful
when we point out how deeply flawed it is. As for xenophobia, we all have a little built into us, try seeing some Reptilian or Insectoid alien without
feeling uneasy in your stomach.
As far as Muslims being hated in America, well you are actually a part of a specially protected class that gets extra rights, we can't even talk
negatively about your religion without the ADL jumping in. While these same Leftists won't allow crosses in public, won't allow you to say a prayer as
the valedictorian, and even remove "under god" from the pledge. So I'd suggest Christians are attacked far more in America than Muslims, it's part of
the Communist agenda that destroys religion and replaces it with atheism, where your religion is now the State, which is far worse than any Abrahamic
religion. All while they are promoting Sharia courts that slap our constitution in the face, and mosques at groundzero run by an "extremist" Muslim
who supports Sharia Law courts in America, just like Elena Kagan.
Also, how about the number of reporters that were beaten and even raped in Egypt during the protests, do arab people treat Westerners perfectly? Or is
it only Westeners that have to be PC and have no comfort issues with people of other cultures? We have a decent number of Europeans being hit with
"racism" crimes for telling the objective truth, while Muslims are allowed to call for people's death all for a fictional book that makes up some
Muslim Mysticism,
The Satanic Verses, "In mid-February 1989, following a violent riot
against the book in Pakistan, the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Supreme Leader of Iran and a Shi'a Muslim scholar, issued a fatwa calling on all good
Muslims to kill Rushdie and his publishers, or to point him out to those who can kill him if they cannot themselves." So is that not hateful? Or how
about
Theo van Gogh speaking out against Islam, he was murdered on the street.
So Westerners allow Muslims to say and do what they want, but when a Westerner is critical of Islam, which isn't difficult, Muslim leaders put a hit
on that person's head? If you ask me, Muslims are far more hateful of the West than Westerners are of Islam, maybe that's because we don't live in the
Middle Ages and we've moved past tribalism slightly more.
All we have to do is look at the Israel situation, your arab leaders use them as a scapegoat to keep your mind off of the oppression you already live
under, they make it so you care more about "pushing the jews into the sea" than about your own living standards. The Zionists aren't real Hebrew Jews
and they certainly did do some land stealing, but it wasn't land that wasn't already stolen, sure would love to see someone trace their lineage back
to Sumer/Babylon. No matter how many puppets the US puts in, you put your own in just as much, even if your "democractic uprisings" (LoLz) weren't
overtaken by the West, they'd be overtaken by plenty of fanatical Muslims. So you're argument that your corrupted religion is misunderstood and that
we're just a bunch of racists is very similar to liberals trying to argue against Individualism, the only thing you have are fallacies and emotions
because you have nothing else.
Islam is corrupt and just plain wrong, Christianity is corrupt and just plain wrong, the Arab world is corrupt and just plain wrong, America is
corrupt and just plain wrong but finally has a real resistance group in it that is becoming the mainstream. Islam doesn't have this resistance group,
unless you include Sufis, but they only say they're Muslim to keep from being conquered. Early Christianity was the resistance group and the Gnostics
would have ended up with a much better religion, but they were oppressed as usual. Arab countries don't have a quality resistance group, they always
end up usurped when they do. While America has a resistance that is very furtile, though usurped in areas, one of the most important things this group
has to do is reveal the lies of religion and Islam and Christianity are very furtile ground.
Unless Islam undergoes a major transformation, it certainly will not, it will still be critiqued and Muslims will continue to respond far more
violently and radically than any other religion. This is not about hate towards you or not understanding your religion, plenty of people who are
outspoken against it can read the Koran in arabic, you can't hide behind that fallacy any longer. We who speak out don't have a problem, you have a
problem because you got suckered, but you likely couldn't help that as I imagine just about everyone around you is Muslim. I have nothing against you
or your people, just like I don't have a problem with individual Christians, but your religion is a very negative thing and your idea of God is the
most damaging thing on this planet. If you realized that all is God and that we reincarnate, I imagine you wouldn't have "radical" sects, but Islam is
set up, more than any other religion, to create "radicals". Yet you ignore this and just assume that we in the West are just hateful bigots who are
afraid of people with turbans, it's very lazy of you, and a typical Leftist fallacy.
This reminds me of the Obama situation with various alien/spiritual channels, they say he's the bee's knees and he's fighting the good fight, yet they
ignore the tremendous amount of evidence that he's clearly pushing the Illuminati agenda publicly. Then those who support these people tell us that we
telling the truth about Obama is hurting him, that we're all just part of some Neo-Con ploy to shame him and bring him down because he's some great
leader the Illuminati are trying to destroy. I believe that Obama is a good guy and is fighting behind the scenes, but publicly he's a shill and
everything he's done has been negative. I believe there are plenty of good Muslims who ignore the absurdity in their religion just like my Christian
parents don't believe in the absurd Christians ideas, but publicly your religion is a corrupted and physically/spiritually destructive social control
tool and just about everything it's done has been negative. I believe that you are good people Hussein and I believe that you objectively believe that
your religion is a good one and has no flaws, but that doesn't change that fact that it is beyond flawed, or that your Hebrew god was an alien bent on
controlling humanity (like Enlil) by making himself the supreme godhead (YHWH), considering most religions differentiated between creator and maker,
god and aliens/angels/demons/sons of god, YHWH smashed them together, so that the creator of the universe also tormented Job or killed everyone's
first born in Egypt.
Here is
How Islam Will Dominate The World to show you just how
deeply flawed. "'It is he (Allah) who has sent his Messenger (saw) with guidance and the religion of truth, in order for it to be dominant over all
other religions, even though the Mushrikoon (disbelievers) hate it.' (EMQ at-Tawbah, 9: 33)" "'Verily Allah has shown me the eastern and western part
of the earth, and I saw the authority of my Ummah (nation) dominate all that I saw.' (Saheeh Muslim, hadeeth #2889)" Then there is
takfir, "The sentence for apostasy, under Sharia law as traditionally interpreted, is execution,
alternate amputation, or expulsion. For this reason, orthodox Islamic law normally requires extremely stringent evidence for such accusations, in many
cases, requiring an Islamic court or a religious leader, an alim, to pronounce a fatwa (legal judgement) of takfir on an individual or group. An
extreme case is exemplified by the early Kharijites, some of whom concluded that any Muslim who sinned ceased to be a Muslim, while others concluded
that any major sin could cause that. The opposite extreme was taken by the Murjites, who argued that anyone who called themselves Muslim should be
considered Muslim."
From Winston Churchill, "A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in
Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final
extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show
splendid qualities, but
the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors
at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the
civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." Then from Israel funded Hamas, "The Day of Judgement will not
come about until Muslims fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O
Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews."
From the fictional Jubal Harshaw, "...I've never been able to understand 'faith' myself, nor to see how a just God could expect his creatures to pick
the one true religion out of an infinitude of false ones-by faith alone. It strikes me as a sloppy way to run an organization, whether a universe or a
smaller one." From Thomas Jefferson, "Difference of opinion is advantageous in religion. The several sects perform the office of a Censor - over each
other." Steven Weinberg says it best, “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But
for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.” Here's our certainly not Christian Founding Fathers take, from Ben Franklin, “Lighthouses
are more useful than churches.” From John Adams, “This would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it!” And from
Thomas Jefferson, “Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man.” So does that make our Founding Fathers a bunch of hateful
bigots who just didn't understand Christianity and religion? From Edward Gibbon, “Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as
false, and by the rulers as useful.”
edit on 25-6-2011 by SincerelySarcastic because: (no reason given)