It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aero56
reply to post by felonius
Let me understand this, it's ok for the religious right to expect "under God" to be spoken,but others of other faiths or those of no faith are labeled in such a way as to make them less than desirable people? [/quote
When "they" are undermining the foundations of our nation, the primary bedrock of our laws...yes. "They" are less than desirable.
As a gnostic, I'm sure that some "mainstream" christians would consider me a heretic. It doesn't bother me in the least. I consider some of them mindless drones.
Nevertheless, I WILL stand with them!
This is part of the "dribs and drabs" of fabian socialism. Its the "little things" that are excused or brushed off that will bite you in the ass later.
The only "enemies" I have are those that oppose the Constitution and the exercise thereof. Little attacks like this ARE attacks on it....and everyone one of us.
In the event you are a "progressive", dont think that just because your in "their" camp things will automatically go great for if our Republic completely fails. If you are of "no use" to them, they will pass you by like any of us that directly oppose them. Remember you history.
An attack on one of us or the things we hold dear is an attack on ALL of us.
I consider you to be one of "us".
Originally posted by k21968
Whether you believe in God, Allah, Zeus, or whomever or whatever you are missing the point, when our GOVt can manipulate our Pledge of Allegiance to remove Under GOd, they can do anything and we are allowing it to happen.
We need to exercise our right of peaceful assembly, right to bear arms, and freedom of speech and tell our Govt they need to go.
That of course is my not so humble opinon.
Originally posted by eNumbra
Originally posted by Section31
When King George (the man) was using religion to rule over people, he established himself as the head of the church. Mankind rules mankind mentality. As a result of reversing the order, mankind is now placed below god. Other words, If you become a corrupt leader, you will eventually have to answer to a higher power.
Why should someone have to answer to a higher power, they should answer to their peers.
Originally posted by eNumbra
Originally posted by Section31
I don't think the founding fathers had a choice, and I think their approach still has merit.
They did not have a choice at the time, I think even now, considering how rigidly much of the world sees their religion the same approach would remain necessary. That's what disappoints me.
Originally posted by eNumbra
Originally posted by Section31
Kind of a separate question, do you hand out presents at Christmas?
You mean the pagan celebration of the winter solstice?
I do, but mostly because others do. I would quite literally become an outcast in today's society if I did not reciprocate.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
The US Constitution
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The words 'under God' do not even belong in the Pledge in the first place. The Pledge is about Patriotism, not about one's personal spiritual beliefs...
Kudos to NBC for having the testicular fortitude to edit them out in the first place, and shame on them for not standing up to the 'flock' and defending this decision!
I'm sure that when TSHTF, we will just be people helping people, and ideology of the other will be the last thing on our minds.
Originally posted by Signals I could remind you that when TSHTF you will need some Christians on your side, I assure you!
So then you're admitting "Under God" is a reference to Christianity then?
Originally posted by Signals
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
The US Constitution
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The words 'under God' do not even belong in the Pledge in the first place. The Pledge is about Patriotism, not about one's personal spiritual beliefs...
Kudos to NBC for having the testicular fortitude to edit them out in the first place, and shame on them for not standing up to the 'flock' and defending this decision!
Hey there Jax,
like it or not it is most certainly an attack on Christianity.
I could remind you that when TSHTF you will need some Christians on your side, I assure you!
Whether you believe in God, Allah, Zeus, or whomever or whatever you are missing the point, when our GOVt can manipulate our Pledge of Allegiance to remove Under GOd, they can do anything and we are allowing it to happen.
Originally posted by k21968
Whether you believe in God, Allah, Zeus, or whomever or whatever you are missing the point, when our GOVt can manipulate our Pledge of Allegiance to remove Under GOd, they can do anything and we are allowing it to happen.
We need to exercise our right of peaceful assembly, right to bear arms, and freedom of speech and tell our Govt they need to go.
That of course is my not so humble opinon.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
The US Constitution
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The words 'under God' do not even belong in the Pledge in the first place. The Pledge is about Patriotism, not about one's personal spiritual beliefs...
Kudos to NBC for having the testicular fortitude to edit them out in the first place, and shame on them for not standing up to the 'flock' and defending this decision!
Originally posted by blackrain17
Originally posted by dadgad
My God? Are you assuming that I am Christian? Because I can assure you I am not. I belong to no established religion.
It doesn't matter if religion is a big fraud. People should be free to practice it. Anywhere they want.
To just ban the word God is ridiculous. I would say ban the whole pledging allegiance. THAT I find ridiculous. That is the ultimate form of brainwash.
So yes, this is an attack at Christianity as far as I'm concerned.
Really? For a Non-Christian, you sound like NBC not saying "God" struck a nerve with you. I have no problems people practicing religion as long as they don't interfere with my life. But when bible thumpers dictate what I need to say, do, or judge me because I'm not Christian, that's when I have a problem with it.
War against Christianity? You sure sound like a Christian to me. What non-Christian would say something like that?
Why ban the whole pledge allegiance? Why not keep it original, without the word "God"?
Originally posted by blackrain17
Originally posted by k21968
Whether you believe in God, Allah, Zeus, or whomever or whatever you are missing the point, when our GOVt can manipulate our Pledge of Allegiance to remove Under GOd, they can do anything and we are allowing it to happen.
We need to exercise our right of peaceful assembly, right to bear arms, and freedom of speech and tell our Govt they need to go.
That of course is my not so humble opinon.
You missed this post. Keep reading this until you remove your idiotic and not so humble opinion...
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
The US Constitution
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The words 'under God' do not even belong in the Pledge in the first place. The Pledge is about Patriotism, not about one's personal spiritual beliefs...
Kudos to NBC for having the testicular fortitude to edit them out in the first place, and shame on them for not standing up to the 'flock' and defending this decision!edit on 22-6-2011 by blackrain17 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by blackrain17
Originally posted by dadgad
My God? Are you assuming that I am Christian? Because I can assure you I am not. I belong to no established religion.
It doesn't matter if religion is a big fraud. People should be free to practice it. Anywhere they want.
To just ban the word God is ridiculous. I would say ban the whole pledging allegiance. THAT I find ridiculous. That is the ultimate form of brainwash.
So yes, this is an attack at Christianity as far as I'm concerned.
Really? For a Non-Christian, you sound like NBC not saying "God" struck a nerve with you. I have no problems people practicing religion as long as they don't interfere with my life. But when bible thumpers dictate what I need to say, do, or judge me because I'm not Christian, that's when I have a problem with it.
War against Christianity? You sure sound like a Christian to me. What non-Christian would say something like that?
Why ban the whole pledge allegiance? Why not keep it original, without the word "God"?
No really I am not Christian, neither do I belong to any religious belief. I find them all despicable to be honest. Surely everyone is free to practice whatever they want. But the fact that each religion appears to own a monopoly on truth bothers me, even more so since the majority of their claims have been debunked by science you know.
However the pledging of allegiance to a flag is just as ridiculous in my opinion. I would never do that. I see little difference between religious totalitarianism and nationalistic totalitarianism. Its brainwash in both cases.
I am a human being living on planet earth together with my fellow human beings, I don't support this kind of division.
Why did I see this as a war on Christianity?
Because those who removed the line God obviously have something against Christianity. I am also including the fact that children aren't allowed any longer to practice their religion at school and anywhere else in public. I find that disturbing.
Then I personally believe that after seeing Bohemian Grove exposed, reading about Skull and Bones, studying the Hollie Greig case and other things that there really are occult or ''satanic'' cults that enjoy a lot of power in this world. I am suggesting that its them who attack Christianity.
You follow my strain of thought now? I might be completely wrong here, who knows.
'
Originally posted by blackrain17
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by blackrain17
Originally posted by dadgad
My God? Are you assuming that I am Christian? Because I can assure you I am not. I belong to no established religion.
It doesn't matter if religion is a big fraud. People should be free to practice it. Anywhere they want.
To just ban the word God is ridiculous. I would say ban the whole pledging allegiance. THAT I find ridiculous. That is the ultimate form of brainwash.
So yes, this is an attack at Christianity as far as I'm concerned.
Really? For a Non-Christian, you sound like NBC not saying "God" struck a nerve with you. I have no problems people practicing religion as long as they don't interfere with my life. But when bible thumpers dictate what I need to say, do, or judge me because I'm not Christian, that's when I have a problem with it.
War against Christianity? You sure sound like a Christian to me. What non-Christian would say something like that?
Why ban the whole pledge allegiance? Why not keep it original, without the word "God"?
No really I am not Christian, neither do I belong to any religious belief. I find them all despicable to be honest. Surely everyone is free to practice whatever they want. But the fact that each religion appears to own a monopoly on truth bothers me, even more so since the majority of their claims have been debunked by science you know.
However the pledging of allegiance to a flag is just as ridiculous in my opinion. I would never do that. I see little difference between religious totalitarianism and nationalistic totalitarianism. Its brainwash in both cases.
I am a human being living on planet earth together with my fellow human beings, I don't support this kind of division.
Why did I see this as a war on Christianity?
Because those who removed the line God obviously have something against Christianity. I am also including the fact that children aren't allowed any longer to practice their religion at school and anywhere else in public. I find that disturbing.
Then I personally believe that after seeing Bohemian Grove exposed, reading about Skull and Bones, studying the Hollie Greig case and other things that there really are occult or ''satanic'' cults that enjoy a lot of power in this world. I am suggesting that its them who attack Christianity.
You follow my strain of thought now? I might be completely wrong here, who knows.
'
Understood. But there is no War against Christianity. More and more people are just realizing there are too many holes in religion.edit on 22-6-2011 by blackrain17 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by blackrain17
reply to post by dadgad
Here is a good explanation of Pledge of Alligiance...
en.wikipedia.org...
.
The original "Pledge of Allegiance" was published in the September 8 issue of the popular children's magazine The Youth's Companion...conceived and promoted by James B. Upham, a marketer for the magazine, as a campaign to instill the idea of American nationalism by selling flags to public schools and magazines to students
Bellamy designed it to be recited in 15 seconds. As a socialist, he had initially also considered using the words equality and fraternity[6] but decided against it - knowing that the state superintendents of education on his committee were against equality for women and African Americans.
Bellamy "viewed his Pledge as an 'inoculation' that would protect immigrants and native-born but insufficiently patriotic Americans from the 'virus' of radicalism and subversion.