It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
The moral ambiguity and lack of respect/regard for God, the flag, the country is disheartening.
Rest assured, I will still fight for your right to (not) believe, to behave in such a manner.
Political correctness has brought us to this point. It was created to divide and insulate populations from hate and to hate. It has provided a "free" pass to those that might (in normal times) find their comments insulting to say, with carte blanche, what ever they want. Exclude whatever they want.
If you don't agree with the Lord's Prayer (in church) then it is your right NOT to go into that church. It is your right NOT to say it.
What is NOT your right, is to edit the Lord's Prayer while being said by people that believe it. What is NOT your right is to deny the oppourtunity for others to say it.
The same can be said for the Pledge of Alliegence.
Beez.
edit on 20-6-2011 by beezzer because: causeedit on 20-6-2011 by beezzer because: 2nd
Originally posted by furono
reply to post by neo96
They aren't about killing your God, they are about not shoving it down everybody's throat. People with so weak beliefs are the ones who feel threatened by stories like this, something these people will never understand.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Saya13
From what I understand, children have the option of opting out, based on their parents decision. An issue that I also find disheartening.
Where is the moral ambiguity in this thread?
Originally posted by beezzer The moral ambiguity and lack of respect/regard for God, the flag, the country is disheartening.
I'm having a tough time deciphering this. Are you're saying PC encouraged us to say what's on our minds?
Originally posted by beezzer Political correctness has brought us to this point. It was created to divide and insulate populations from hate and to hate. It has provided a "free" pass to those that might (in normal times) find their comments insulting to say, with carte blanche, what ever they want. Exclude whatever they want.
Why is this not a right?
Originally posted by beezzer What is NOT your right, is to edit the Lord's Prayer while being said by people that believe it.
You're right. It wouldn't be a free country then.
Originally posted by beezzer What is NOT your right is to deny the oppourtunity for others to say it.
Have you covered every speech you hold sacred?
Originally posted by beezzer The same can be said for the Pledge of Alliegence.
Are you saying you're upset that we have the right to protect our children from predators?
Originally posted by beezzer From what I understand, children have the option of opting out, based on their parents decision. An issue that I also find disheartening.
Originally posted by dadgad
Interesting, there really seems to be a war against Christianity going on.
Is it the satanists? Is the rationalist, the nihilist? The Jew? Someone up there doesn't like Christianity that much.
Originally posted by blackrain17
Originally posted by dadgad
Interesting, there really seems to be a war against Christianity going on.
Is it the satanists? Is the rationalist, the nihilist? The Jew? Someone up there doesn't like Christianity that much.
So people that do not believe in Christianity is now a Satanist?
War against Christianity? You sound like our government putting "War" very freely on some misguided religion.
Maybe we are getting more intelligent and finding out that religion is a big fraud. How do you even know it's a Christian god? Would you be upset if we said "one nation under God" but it was an Islamic God? What makes your God better than some other God?
We need to ban the phrase "under God", period...
Originally posted by gentledissident
Where is the moral ambiguity in this thread?
Originally posted by beezzer The moral ambiguity and lack of respect/regard for God, the flag, the country is disheartening.
Originally posted by MikeboydUS
reply to post by Annee
Congress replaced E Pluribis Unum, with "In god we trust", not "under god". The pledge and the national motto are two different things.
If you don't like it, have the law changed. Thats the process in our system. People can say the country is this or that, but the law is the law regardless. We are a nation of laws and they can be changed.