Childhood diseases return as parents refuse vaccines

Originally posted by Dashdragon

Originally posted by jameshawkings

Originally posted by Xiamara
reply to post by jameshawkings

 

There is a difference, but, I was merely pointing out is in no way is mercury DIRECTLY injected into the vein. A Vaccine is NOT I will say is again NOT NOT N O T intravenous, meaning in vein. So to clarify the vaccine is not going into the blood stream via vein but into fatty tissue in your arm thigh butt or stomach.

The amount of mercury on average is 2 - 3 MICROgrams per ml Source. the average in is 52.7 micrograms per gram (white tuna)... Source

For reference one ml or pure water = 1 gram... So a little math and estimating shows MORE mercury in fish and I'm sure your eating more than a gram of fish...


EDIT:

For got to add through eating fish we encounter Bio-magnification (look it up and learn a bit)

edit on 17-6-2011 by Xiamara because: (no reason given)

The point remains the same as by injecting mercury we bypass the stomach, so the two should never be compared.

Does your stomach do something magical to the mercury that the fatty tissues in your body don't? It is quicker to damage your kidneys than anything else and your stomach is the first stop to them.

Also, the only current (standard) vaccine that would even have any is the flu shot...which even most of us vaccination advocates have stated we don't take.

If a substance enters your stomach, it doesn't necessarily get absorbed by the body; it might do and it might not. Whereas if a toxic substance is injected directly into fat, it takes time to reach the circulation, but when mercury does if it heads to the brain it will remain there and do some damage, you better hope it hits somewhere you can function without, if it doesn't go to the brain it will most likely end up in the kidneys as they clean the blood. Unfortunately mercury tends to stick around in the Kidneys after that. Either way, brain or kidney, neither is good. At least when we orally consume mercury it might not be absorbed at all, so injection is clearly worse.

reply to post by HappyBunny


Timely article wouldn't you say? Oh no you wouldn't ...You can not see the propaganda for what it is when it flushes out from places like the CDC and WHO.

They control the media.

Do you really think that the same big business who allows all the other toxic garbage to destroy lives is really concerned with these diseases?

Their concern is the backroom deals for vaccines which have their own private statistics. Their concern is not for humanity, they have shown that over and over.

It is pure ignorance to think that these campaigns are anything but hype to sell more drugs and toxic cocktails.

reply to post by Griffo


All disease is man made, this is a disinfo scare to get the sheep back in line for that poison.

Originally posted by izero
There is no link to vaccinations and autism. That is rubbish. Do some real research and stop feeding that confirmation bias.

And vaccinate your chldren. Any good doctor will tell you vaccines aren't foolproof but they are better than nothing.

This is what we have to be told, as otherwise it would cost a billions in vaccine damage awards and also people wouldn't trust them again. We cannot trust what we are told by businesses with blind faith. If we did then apparently McDonalds food is perfectly healthy (as part of a balanced diet)

Vaccinations are different. duh. You wouldn't catch me inline for some made up hysteria swine flu vac. Nor my kids.
Childhood vaccinations are differnt and have clearly prevented desease. So to write off all vaccinations as harmful
would be assinine. In the face of what went on with the swine flu? I think it would be twice as stupid to say there all good and we should devour them as they become available.

Originally posted by brianmg5

The bottom line... there is * * * ZERO evidence supporting the idea that they (vaccines) are harmful.

If a vaccine has never harmed anyone and never will harm anyone, why do the vaccine manufacturers and those who administer the vaccines need to have immunity from damage claims based on the harm caused by vaccines?

Frankly, it's hard to trust anyone who speaks with a forked tongue. On the one hand, we're assured that these vaccinations are good for us and will cause no harm. On the other hand, they say that if we are harmed by these harmless vaccines, that's just too bad, we'll have to lick your own wounds, go bankrupt trying to recover, and they will not pay or be liable for a penny of compensation.

Now that's reassuring!!

Originally posted by dubiousone

Originally posted by brianmg5

The bottom line... there is * * * ZERO evidence supporting the idea that they (vaccines) are harmful.

If a vaccine has never harmed anyone and never will harm anyone, why do the vaccine manufacturers and those who administer the vaccines need to have immunity from damage claims based on the harm caused by vaccines?

Frankly, it's hard to trust anyone who speaks with a forked tongue. On the one hand, we're assured that these vaccinations are good for us and will cause no harm. On the other hand, they say that if we are harmed by these harmless vaccines, that's just too bad, we'll have to lick your own wounds, go bankrupt trying to recover, and they will not pay or be liable for a penny of compensation.

Now that's reassuring!!

edit on 6/17/2011 by dubiousone because: Spelling

Well summed up dubiousone

reply to post by crazydaisy

That would be the "Squalene" issue,I did mention it,apparently there might be differing strengths as the general public would be getting a watered down version..aka your kid is getting a chemical not a medicine.If you aply corporate medicinal practices lately.The effects may be dangerous as it was for me .

Doctors are not reliable as they DO NOT cure.Big Pharma not reliable ,THEY FREQUENTLY KILL PEOPLE FOR THE BOTTOM LINE!
My insurance would not accept my placement in ICU because 2 weeks ago BECAUSE THEY DISAGREED WITH THE ATTENDING SURGEON IN THE VA.
Thank you very much for your opinion about current abhorrent medical practices,we are now advanced enough to cure things.

It looks like there has been a huge awakening on ATS within the last 2 years, most likely due to the Swine Flu scam. This encouraged people to educate themselves on the topic as they knew something wasn't right. The Swime Flu sterilization program has clearly backfired, the Pharms would have been better keeping things as they were; the Swine Flu Scam was a game changer. Before Swine Flu the majority of people thought that vaccines were perfectly safe, justified and without hidden agenda

reply to post by randyvs

Childhood vaccinations are differnt and have clearly prevented desease. So to write off all vaccinations as harmful would be assinine.

Really? Show me the double blind studies that prove vaccines have prevented any disease? You are smart enough to realize not to take swine flu and other vaccines why in the world would you trust their word on other vaccines. Stop blindly believing and look at the facts and proof. Proof Vaccines Do Not Work

reply to post by Griffo


Here is my one quest to the OP if vacciness are so safe why does the US governemnt have a vaccine compensation fund? The federal government's vaccine compensation fund helps take care of the medical costs of children who have seizure disorders or brain damage that stems from vaccination.

Originally posted by guitarplayer
Here is my one quest to the OP if vacciness are so safe why does the US governemnt have a vaccine compensation fund? The federal government's vaccine compensation fund helps take care of the medical costs of children who have seizure disorders or brain damage that stems from vaccination.

Traveling in airplanes is pretty safe too, safer than a car. But just because it's pretty safe, doesn't mean it's without risk. Sometimes, airplanes crash, and sometimes, people need to be compensated for vaccine related injury. In neither case do those facts point to a classification of "dangerous" just like anything else, there's some risk. There's risk in crossing the street. Seriously.

These vaccine threads always make me think that there are people who are paid to surf forums and sway opinion.

People arent accepting our solutions and all those DNA and brain changes we wish to do, via our vaccinations, lock and unlock genes and dna sequences and mutate them, so, Quick [shifty eyes look sideways] have to create some kind of outbreak and then:

1.problem ---check
2.reaction ---wait...... we cant get to the solution, they seem to be on to us, what the heck, nuke em.

I say, Bring It!!!!


Pentagon Eugenics Alter DNA breed out Religious impulses via FunVax Vaccinations & Aerosol [

"Childhood Diseases Return As Parents Refuse Vaccines"

After running the thread title through the Orwellian Translation Machine, I came up with this -

"Our Propaganda Is Suffering Terribly With All The Information Now Readily Available On Vaccines, Therefore, This Is Simply Another Attempt By Society's Designers To Bring You Back To The Norm Of The Obscenely Profitable Continued Managed Sickness Paradigm By Shaming You Publicly"

Cheers

reply to post by Love thy neighbor


Absolutely! It is well known that the "pharma-bloggers" are paid quite well to do this. Life form lower than a troll. So when someone says "do the research for yourself", unfortunately many good sites have been sabotaged.

Originally posted by mb2591
You have more of a chance to get sick and/or die from a vaccine then you have if you get no vaccine at all
I urge every one to stay away from vaccines

edit on 16-6-2011 by mb2591 because: (no reason given)

Remember a little thing called smallpox? This dandy of an infectious disease was responsible for the deaths of 400,000 europeans each year leading up to the 19th century, and killed 300-500 million in the 20th century alone.

Eradicated by good old vaccination! Imagine the bodycount these days if all people had this attitude with smallpox?

Granted, measles is no smallpox, but there is no reason to believe that these vaccines are killing us. A few die this year, but if lack of vaccinations keep up, eventually this could become an pandemic.

I had my 2 year old boy simultaneously MMR (measles mumps, rubella) & flu vaccinated while he was sick with the flu. I dont know why i did it with all the hype of MMR overloading kids bodies and causing autism. after the vaccinations he was messed up for a good day and a half (sleeping a lot & unresponsive even for a 20 month old) A

\After a while he snapped out of it and is developing fine. hes now almost 3. ive heard stories of associates with children who have autisim & they say it started after the vaccines. If my kid was autistic i would think it was from the shots, just from his reaction immidiatly after. my kid snapped out of it. that all im saying.

Some research links:

www.whale.to...

www.naturalnews.com...

Originally posted by SaturnFX
This is a good thing though
its social darwinism...if people adhere to anti-vaccine psychology, then breed, well...its not like their children are coming from fantastic stock to begin with.

Really? what an elitst attitude

In a world populated with far too many morons, having the kids of morons die through preventable issues seems perfectly acceptable, if not desirable.

So now people who are concerned about vaccines having negative effects are morons?

Misanthopic much?