It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by spy66
You again underestimate the probability of all those Ex- military and those within the military who are already discontent with the way the government acts. Try talking to some of the military that are now still under oath and see what they tell you. You might be surprised that your 'fatalistic' idea is wrong!
Zindo
Originally posted by snowspirit
The thing I don't understand about the fema camps, is, how can "everyone" fit into a camp?
There's about 330 million people in the USA, and there's no possible way for them to all fit into these camps, unless they're going in one side, and turning into soylent green, or into a big firey pit or something just as perverse.
There's just not enough room. I don't understand the concept...
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by spy66
NO, being under oath means you follow 'Legal' orders and not those that contradict Constitutional and Human right mandates. Besides, who, other than the progressives that follow lockstep with the elites, ever listens to 'Lame Stream Media' anymore?
Zindoedit on 5/22/2011 by ZindoDoone because: (no reason given)
NO, being under oath means you follow 'Legal' orders
Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
Sad that most can't see outside the box.
And make it harder than it really is.
Once the economy collapses, the gov. will shut everything down. No planes,( they did that after 9/11). No busses and no trains or boats.
Next, stop all commerce, no more deliverys of gasoline, food or meds, the essentials.
Next, shut down all utilitys, no more power, natural gas or water.
None of that takes an army.
All water, power and supplys will be diverted to safe havens for the elite, military bases and fema camps.
Again no army needed. Why put your troops in a combat situation ? Just protect and maintain what you already control.
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by spy66
NO, being under oath means you follow 'Legal' orders and not those that contradict Constitutional and Human right mandates. Besides, who, other than the progressives that follow lockstep with the elites, ever listens to 'Lame Stream Media' anymore?
Zindoedit on 5/22/2011 by ZindoDoone because: (no reason given)
NO, being under oath means you follow 'Legal' orders
Well that has been proven to be a failure. Iraq and Afghanistan has proven that you fallow orders rather than legal orders. Because you dont know the difference between them (legal orders and orders) because they are given to you by the authority which you have sworn your oath to obey.