It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by filosophia
Enlightened has a positive connotation, and ego usually has a negative connotation, so an "enlightened ego" is a contradiction, like a permanent impermanence, an immortal mortal, so there is a problem of communication here.
The Self is not ego, it is pure consciousness or pure mind. If you say enlightened ego, then you are using ego in a positive connotation otherwise you are using enlightenment in a negative connotation.
The simple fact is you are speaking of a "hindrance" and thus you are speaking of the ego. The "enlightened" adjective is not redundant but damaging to the idea you are presenting as it is an antonym and not a synonym for ego.
So if the "enlightened ego" is a bad thing, a hindrance, in what way is enlightenment a hindrance? If it is, it is not enlightenment.
Enlightenment means a state of light, or to (en)light. This clearly is a reference to meditation's ability to reveal the inner light within the mind. The Buddha spoke of gaining his enlightenment after he meditated for 7 days under the Bohdi tree, that was the point of pure awakening.
So in conclusion, an enlightened ego or an awakened ego is not a bad thing, otherwise it is using the term enlightenment in the wrong connotation, a negative one and not a positive one.
So, I'll await the arguments as to why enlightenment is a bad thing.
Originally posted by 1Starman
Originally posted by kidohno
Originally posted by 1Starman
Now try tell everyone here who is trying to show the others that they are intelligent in the way they comment in the threads that it is not Ego that they are displaying.edit on 23-5-2011 by 1Starman because: (no reason given)
I think people should be allowed to give their say without being branded egocentric. I don't think the majority of posters here are speaking thru ego.
Let us ask you what is ego? Give us some examples
You are mistaken ! We are not accusing them of being egocentric.We are merely pointing out that that line of thought is an example of what ego is.edit on 23-5-2011 by 1Starman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dyllels
Originally posted by DreamerOracle
.... the Enlightened Ego (excited child) took over except it isn't enlightened it is the opposite, it is the thing that bars the way. You cannot get rid of ego it is part of you, control it and be aware of it.
I am very familiar with that 'excited child' feeling you describe. I feel like sometimes it is holding me back. A part of me would like to, in a way, boast to myself that I went through those experiences. Its sort of like a self-affirmation, or a pat on the back. I'm trying to steer my mind away from that way of thinking. Is there a specific thought process or method you followed to try and to calm down that excited, 'enlightened ego'?
Thanks for sharing your story.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Okay, I'm going to try this one more time for the slow, ignorant fools on this thread.
YOU'RE NARCISSISTS, SOCIOPATHS, OR PSYCHOPATHS
You're lining up pretty much perfectly with the terms...to a T.
You don't even realize that your own perspectives are infantile...
This is just garbage on this thread.
Have fun in la-la land!
I could link dozens of these if you really want me to...edit on 23-5-2011 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)
More importantly only share your experiences with those that wish to know. Never share without being asked first, it's being humble and not overzealous
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by DreamerOracle
More importantly only share your experiences with those that wish to know. Never share without being asked first, it's being humble and not overzealous
Better yet, don't ever share your inner experiences with anyone, provided that you are willing to deny your ego to such an extent.
Originally posted by 1Starman
Please do some research ! Following the paths that has been dreamt up by mankind will lead you round and round in circles.The meaning of enlightenment is the most misunderstood in the material dimension.
In other words, if you find yourself feeling superior over others because you have had some sort of a realization or glimpse at awakening, you have done nothing but “enlightened your ego”, not your sense of Self. And that is just another form of the “dream state”, so in fact, you are no more wise or awakened than them.
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
The urge to help others definitely arises from the ego, however, there are those who are fearless enough to leave 'home', to try and help others, knowing they can easily find their way back. Pertaining to this notion of both of yours, what would you say about Christ, Buddha, Ramana Maharshi... or any of the other awakened who all have tried to share their inner experiences?
Originally posted by 1Starman
We are a few individuals who are on the path to discarding our human properties.We do have ego's and we try to suppress and turn off our physical human mind and thoughts and manifest our higher consciousness(self) most of the time and as long as we are able to in the light of the needs of the physical body in the material world.You are the one who thinks that our words are more important than yours.(We have Not in any way given the impression that our words are the authoritative one)
We see that you are going about it the wrong way.You are trying to deal with the ego directly when the solution has to be base on another process to remove all traces of the ego.In the human form,with the physical mind and thoughts influenced by the material world,it is impossible to stop the ego from surfacing.
What does it matter if we are awaken or not,or if we are enlighten or not. It has no meaning to us in the universe.The pursuit of enlightenment is actually invented by man and it is something that has been misunderstood.
It does not matter what we are,as we shall cease to exist individually in the near future and there shall be no traces of what we have done .
Originally posted by TravelerintheDark
That they exercised well intended futility. You can't share what you don't possess. Enlightenment isn't something that can be passed on as removing ego removes any and all illusions pertaining to ownership. They had nothing to share other than ego perceptions. So the why is easier to answer I believe. Because they believed genuinely that they had nothing better to do based on their personality type. I'd bet my life that there are many more who never told anyone of their experience understanding that any attempt to do so is useless because the path is never easier or harder. It is simply a path.
Btw, how fearless is it to seek a path believing you know you can easily find your way back.
Namasteedit on 24/5/11 by TravelerintheDark because: addition
The urge to help others definitely arises from the ego, however, there are those who are fearless enough to leave 'home', to try and help others, knowing they can easily find their way back.
Pertaining to this notion of both of yours, what would you say about Christ, Buddha, Ramana Maharshi... or any of the other awakened who all have tried to share their inner experiences?