It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flighty
reply to post by Skewed
Previous to the last century or so, most of us would have been dead by 40. (averages, of course there are exceptions).
Whether it was through mental illness making us vulnerable to all the plagues or other medical reasons.
Maybe modern medicine it keeping those of us alive, who, if we were living in a different time, would be dead by nor for one reason or another....
Maybe , according to the law of jungle as you put it, most of us would not live.
But who's to say that those who are currently healthy NOW might not be so, next year or the year after.
Health is a very vulnerable thing that isn't constant and can turn on a pin head.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
I tell you what, we are the parents and we are the ones that dictate what is to be given to our children or not, yes I regret with all my hart that back in the 90s when my son was a 12 year old I fell for the Ritalin propaganda I had my son on that crap for almost a year because the school system told me so, when my son started to act lifeless I took him to a psychologist and after testing him he told me that he didn't needed anything and that he was just a normal child.
There you got it, when I took the test to the school they were scare I was going to sue them.
Now most physiologist are sold to big pharmacy and working with the schools to dope children.
Instead of empowering a patient to overcome one's mental problems, psychiatry suggests the patient just isn't mentally strong enough to begin with....
....Mary Vernon blitzed the doctors with her usual impressive barrage of facts and figures..... But she ended with something I'd not heard her talk about before. She said that the medical profession has contributed to "learned helplessness" by prescribing a diet that doesn't work for a lot of people, and then blaming the patient as being "non-compliant" when it didn't work.... lowcarbdiets.about.com...
...In 1933, a clinical study carried out at the Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh studied the effects of low- and high-calorie diets, ranging from 800 to 2,700 kcals.
Average daily losses:
high carb/low fat diet - 49g [like a modern slimming diet]
high carb/low protein - 122g
low carb/high protein - 183g
low carbohydrate/high fat - 205g
Drs Lyon and Dunlop pointed out that:
'The most striking feature of the table is that the losses appear to be inversely proportionate to the carbohydrate content of the food. Where the carbohydrate intake is low the rate of loss in weight is greater and conversely.'
In other words, the less carbohydrate was eaten, the greater was the amount of weight lost.
In 1955 Dr Albert Pennington in the USA also found that: 'weight loss appeared to be inversely related to the amount of glycogenic materials in the diet. Carbohydrate is 100 per cent, protein 58 per cent and fat 10 per cent glycogenic.' (In other words, the more a food increased insulin production, the less weight was lost - and in this respect, to lose weight, again carbohydrate was worst and fat best.)
Pennington continued: 'The recommended diet is a calorically unrestricted one, very low in carbohydrate, high in fat and moderate in protein. Neither fat nor protein is restricted, however.'
Pennington's diet was so successful that it was reported in Holiday magazine, where it became known as 'The Holiday Diet'.
Professor Alan Kekwick and Dr Gaston Pawan had similar results... forum.lowcarber.org...
THE LECTIN REPORT
DEFINITION
Protein or glycoprotein substances, usually of plant origin, of non-immunoglobulin nature, capable of specific recognition of and reversible binding to, carbohydrate moieties of complex glycoconjugates without altering the covalent structure of any of the recognized glycosyl ligands. This group includes monovalent lectins (i.e. bacterial and plant toxins). These lectins bind to sugar moieties in cell walls or membranes and thereby change the physiology of the membrane to cause agglutination, mitosis, or other biochemical changes in the cell. (agglutination- clumping; mitosis-multiplication or division of a cell forming two daughter cells)
High levels of lectins (specialized proteins) may be found in grains (also known as cereals or pulses), legumes (that is 'beans' including peanuts), dairy and plants in the nightshade family [potato, tomato, eggplant and pepper]. Many other foods contain lectins but are less well studied and the amounts of lectins present are not thought to be as high or as potentially toxic.
Lectins purified from the germinating seeds of wheat (Triticumspp.); bind to carbohydrate moieties on cell surface glycoproteins and are used to identify certain cell populations and inhibit or promote some immunological or physiological activities.
.... Lectins from the castor bean are highly toxic and can kill if ingested in even small amounts. Lectins from kidney beans have been implicated as cause in an outbreak of 'food poisoning' with no known pathogen.... www.krispin.com...
Previous to the last century or so, most of us would have been dead by 40....
We have been bombarded that low fat and lots of vegetables and fruits are the key to health, but in my case is can actually rob me of my good health and well being.
What can a say I am a meat eater after all, but i make sure is organic and the animals are raise with good care.
Once again another very interesting thread. so does this mean my chemical imbalance which causes my depression a lie and the med not really do anything?
Originally posted by Flighty
reply to post by Skewed
Previous to the last century or so, most of us would have been dead by 40. (averages, of course there are exceptions).
Whether it was through mental illness making us vulnerable to all the plagues or other medical reasons.
Maybe modern medicine it keeping those of us alive, who, if we were living in a different time, would be dead by nor for one reason or another....
Maybe , according to the law of jungle as you put it, most of us would not live.
But who's to say that those who are currently healthy NOW might not be so, next year or the year after.
Health is a very vulnerable thing that isn't constant and can turn on a pin head.
Originally posted by jude11
150,000,000 Americans Classified as Mentally ILL?