It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by muzzleflash
Your links do not work for me. And you think that voila, the communist Revolution happened with nothing preceding it?
So it's my fault you cannot use search engines or wikipedia?
There is this thing called doing your own research and providing evidence for your claims. You have done none of this.
PROVE that Communism has anything to do with the Boxers.
If you can prove it, I will admit you are right and that I was wrong. Simple.
However I seriously doubt that will come to pass.
Russia had meanwhile been busy (October 1900) with occupying much of the northeastern province of Manchuria, a move which threatened Anglo-American hopes of maintaining what remained of China's territorial integrity and openness to commerce (the "Open Door Policy") to all comers, but paid the concept only lip service. This behavior led ultimately to a disastrous Russian defeat (in the Russo-Japanese War) at the hands of an increasingly confident Japan (1904-1905), as they maintained garrisons and improved fortifications between Port Arthur and Harbin along the southern spur line of the Manchurian Railway constructed on their leased lands.
Following the Boxer Rebellion1 of 1900, (ridding China of all foreigners, massacring all missionaries and Christian converts), China's citizens experienced starvation, extreme poverty, and grief resulting in the loss of many innocent lives. This set the stage for the acceptance of men like Zedong and the godless Communistic philosophies of Karl Marx. After being under the rule of warlords around 1916, many Chinese began joining revolutionary groups and political parties in hopes of changing their country. During and after the Great Revolution (1914—1918), China saw several movements which strongly fostered a path into Communism.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
It looks to me more like you are trying to depict the US as an Imperialist force. And how convenient to tie it in to the recent killing of Osama.
It is traditional for states to call their own terrorism "counterterror," even the worst mass murderers: the Nazis, for example. In occupied Europe they claimed to be defending the population and legitimate governments from the partisans, terrorists supported from abroad. That was not entirely false; even the most egregious propaganda rarely is. The partisans were undoubtedly directed from London, and they did engage in terror. The US military had some appreciation of the Nazi perspective: its counterinsurgency doctrine was modeled on Nazi manuals, which were analyzed sympathetically, with the assistance of Wehrmacht officers.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
It looks to me more like you are trying to depict the US as an Imperialist force. And how convenient to tie it in to the recent killing of Osama.
Who tied anything to Osama?
I guess I missed that part. I apologize. I really don't see a connection...
Originally posted by muzzleflashMaybe it's time the 8 nation alliance comes clean and apologizes formally and publicly to the Chinese people for what we did 110 years ago? I think that would be a honorable thing to do, personally.
Originally posted by Riposte
Originally posted by muzzleflashMaybe it's time the 8 nation alliance comes clean and apologizes formally and publicly to the Chinese people for what we did 110 years ago? I think that would be a honorable thing to do, personally.
Ok, then where do we stop? 150 years? 200 years? 5000 years?
Should I start demanding apologies from Italy for the Romans' Gallic War over 2000 years ago? Or maybe the Greeks should start apologizing to Turkey for Alexander the Great?