Nuclear Accident at Plant in Mississippi USA gets Totally Ignored!!! Why?

Originally posted by muzzleflash

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Something weird at a nuke plant in Georgia too...www.abovetopsecret.com... on April 25.

Wow I didn't even know about the incident in Georgia either. I guess I have been missing out on everything the last week or two, insane.

blame O[s/b]ama

How come this is not going viral? Surely if anything should do, it is this? I only found out about it looking up information on the floods, its not in any of the major news outlets. This is just as big as Fukushima.

reply to post by wasco2


question: if we really "need" nuclear energy then why not use Thorium?

answer: you can't make bombs with it

reply to post by wasco2


Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor @ Google Tech Talks


board.freedomainradio.com...

Because LFTRs operate at atmospheric pressure, they are less likely than conventional pressurized reactors to spew radioactive elements if an accident occurs. In addition, an increase in operating temperature slows down the nuclear chain reaction, inherently stabilizing the reactor. And LFTRs are designed with a salt plug at the bottom that melts if reactor temperatures somehow do rise too high, draining reactor fluid into a containment vessel where it essentially freezes.

It is estimated that 83 percent of LFTR waste products are safe within 10 years, while the remainder needs to be stored for 300 years. Another advantage is that LFTRs can use plutonium and nuclear waste as fuel, transmuting them into much less radioactive and harmful elements, thus eliminating the need for waste storage lasting up to 10,000 years. No commercial thorium reactors currently exist, although China announced a project earlier this year that aims to develop such reactors.

The main problem with energy supply systems is that for the last 100 years, governments have insisted on meddling with them, using subsidies, setting rates, and picking technologies. Consequently, entrepreneurs, consumers, and especially policymakers have no idea which power supply technologies actually provide the best balance between cost-effectiveness and safety. In any case, let’s hope that the current nuclear disaster will not substantially add to the terrible woes the Japanese must bear as a result of nature’s fickle cruelty.

reason.com...


www.getsolar.com...

At this point in history, if all government liability loopholes, tax breaks, and subsidies were removed in the energy industry, SOLAR would be the most profitable energy source.

Nuclear, coal and oil plants cost more to build and insure than a couple different varieties of the latest solar plants, and require the purchase of fuel that keeps rising in price. Solar plants cost less to build (at least some of them), and have no future fuel costs, and cost less to insure. Without insurance breaks, nuclear is less profitable that solar. Without subsidies, coal and oil are less profitable than solar. Without government, companies would follow the money to solar.

Originally posted by Firefly_
How come this is not going viral? Surely if anything should do, it is this? I only found out about it looking up information on the floods, its not in any of the major news outlets. This is just as big as Fukushima.

This^^^^^^^^^ right here. NO. This is NOT just as big as fukishima. The only information we have is an alarm was triggered. We have NO idea how much was spilt. To imply it is as big as the unprecedented problems in fukiashima is either incredibly ignorant or intentionally over dramatic.

reply to post by muzzleflash


Why does nothing look out of the ordinary on radiation network?

reply to post by DerepentLEstranger


I'll admit thorium reactors sound promising but they're not here yet:

www.energybulletin.net...


As for IAUS (Delta Solar Project) it appears they are some of the solar scam artists I mentioned earlier:

peswiki.com...irectory:IAS

The technology looks interesting but I suspect, given the seedy character of the company's principals, there are some serious flaws being hidden.

reply to post by Hypocretes


Because nothing IS out of the ordinary.

The EPA site says that tritium ingested can be excreted relatively fast, and that people are exposed to small amounts of tritium even on a natural basis. Tritium can be found in exit signs, and for that reason it is illegal to dump them in landfills, and the site recommends not breaking them up because it would release the tritium which is what is used to make the signs shine at night. It is usually in the form of tritated water, but sometimes in a gas form. It also is apparently one of the least dangerous radionuclides.


here's the EPA website www.epa.gov...

This in no way i smeant to imply that people living near the release are safe.

Wow... Don't know how I missed this post before. Thanks for the post, OP, this one touches kinda close to home for me. My stepdad used to work at this nuke plant when I was growing up. This was back in the old days (early 80's), and he used to bring me with him to work on the weekends sometimes. No way he could do something like that now with all the security these places have. He used to bring in his teenage son to play on the computers at a nuke plant, can you imagine what kind of hell I could have wreaked had I been interested? lol...

hydroxyl radicals is a type of "detergen"t to cleanse / purify, tritium attacks it. wow seems they released it just in time for the flooding ALL THE WAY TO THE GULF AGAIN really really bad stuff guys wow im really new here by the way sorry if i was overwhelmed and skipped any formal pleasantries the dark is doin their best as to destroy and dysfunction our DNA from activating, everything in the big picture, its all gonna be fine whats best for everyone, Cellular mitosis on a hyper dimensional scale if you will. its beautiful. there are no such things as unsolved mysteries.

as long as the stuff wasnt released into the air,its no big deal except for the people downriver...I live about 55 miles ESE of that plant and I never heard a word about it on any local media outlet...

reply to post by Homedawg


This was finally posted-

www.tennessean.com...

I need to check the topix website again to see what else there might be. I hope our disaster prep is not going to get further tested in this region. Tornadoes and floods is enough.

reply to post by Firefly_


As big as Fukushima??? How can you possibly say that? How much Tritium was pumped into the river? The only thing I can find states that some water had been pumped from an unused turbine building sump and that it contained some amount of Tritium. No amount of radioactive release is good for us but to fear monger with no definite facts is totatally irresponsible and is typically what you would expect from other sites, not ATS,

Originally posted by fltcui
reply to post by Firefly_

 

. No amount of radioactive release is good for us but to fear monger with no definite facts is totatally irresponsible and is typically what you would expect from other sites, not ATS,

Really? That's exactly what I've come to expect from ATS, wild fear mongering with little to no basis in fact.

This is the reason why I'm loving ATS so much. You guys see what so many many many people cannot see.

And no, its not sarcasm.

reply to post by muzzleflash


So is this how TPTB are going to thin the herd? It kind of adds up if you believe all of the conspiracies, HAARP is used to trigger a large earthquake in Japan causing a Tsunami which was sure to destroy the nuclear facility sitting right on the coast line there. Then, with all of the fallout that would happen TPTB could blame any sicknesses related to nuclear fallout on the Japan incident, so let's dump some Tritium into the largest river in our country in the midst of a tremendous flood. Sounds like a perfect kill off of a few thousand people with no evidence.

why isnt this thread headlining?

reply to post by muzzleflash


This Mississippi altercation is all coming to quickly, I feel badly for the folks there and truth be told, I fear for their long term safety, we all know Fukushima is and was very very disastrous and will cause many harmful contaminants for years to come. I really hope NASA gets their stuff together before they realize its too late. (The cloud creating machine) (Rocket Fuel testing device)