It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Workers at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Plant in Port Gibson, Miss., last Thursday released a large amount of radioactive tritium directly into the Mississippi River, according to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and experts are currently trying to sort out the situation. An investigation is currently underway to determine why the tritium was even present in standing water found in an abandoned unit of the plant, as well as how much of this dangerous nuclear byproduct ended up getting dumped into the river. Many also want to know why workers released the toxic tritium before conducting proper tests. Learn more: www.naturalnews.com...
The Mississippi Natchez Democrat reports that crews first discovered the radioactive water in the plant's Unit 2 turbine building after heavy rains began hitting the area last week. Learn more: www.naturalnews.com...
Naturally occurring tritium is extremely rare on Earth, where trace amounts are formed by the interaction of the atmosphere with cosmic rays.
Tritium is an isotope of hydrogen, which allows it to readily bind to hydroxyl radicals, forming tritiated water (HTO), and to carbon atoms. Since tritium is a low energy beta emitter, it is not dangerous externally (its beta particles are unable to penetrate the skin), but it is a radiation hazard when inhaled, ingested via food or water, or absorbed through the skin.
A beta radioactive substance, tritium bombards cells and damages DNA when inhaled or swallowed, and can persist in the body for more than ten years upon exposure. Its perpetual effect on cells can lead to all sorts of serious diseases, including, but not limited to, gene mutations, birth defects, and cancer. Learn more: www.naturalnews.com...
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
Great thread, muzz. S+F.
Where have you been???
Anyways, I was actually going to post this but I assumed someone already posted it on ATS when it happened. I guess I shouldn't assume.
In the coming years, these nuclear plants will get exponentially more dangerous as they age and become less reliable.edit on 7-5-2011 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by stopthatfrog
Excuse me for my limited knowledge of American geography, but how does this tie in with the flooding along the mississippi? Which is discussed in another thread on here but as this is my first post i have no idea how to link. Will the levee breach at Birds point have an affect? Well the Blast that caused the breach? Any clue on what effects the stuff dumped will have on the flooded farm land? Sorry for all the questions but i have been following the other thread and hadnt noticed anything about this. I know America is huge but so much in such a small space of time, Really?
Originally posted by notsofunnyguy
Actually, I think there was some mention of it in one of the flood threads a couple of days ago, and it briefly showed up on the RSOE website.
Gone now though.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Personally I would choose to have 1000 floods over 1 nuclear pollution accident.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
In the coming years, these nuclear plants will get exponentially more dangerous as they age and become less reliable.edit on 7-5-2011 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)
(...)
"Evacuation is far, far superior to rescue," Barbour said.
Engineers say the Mississippi River levees are expected to hold in his state, but floodwaters will go over the top of the Yazoo backwater levees.
Barbour said the Grand Gulf nuclear power plant in Claiborne County won't flood, but roads leading to the plant might go under water. The plant is about 25 miles south of Vicksburg.
The governor said as many as 1,400 square-miles of crop lands could flood statewide, and losses could exceed $100 million.
He said the Mississippi River at Vicksburg is likely to be higher than it was during the flood of 1927. Levees failed near Greenville in 1927, inundating the Delta but sparing Vicksburg what could've been a much larger catastrophe.
Originally posted by AlphaExray
reply to post by muzzleflash
About time someone noticed. There was an incident in Ohio a couple of weeks ago as well. Looks like QRE. These reactors don't need stress tests, they need to be tested for thermal integrity. I have a feeling we may be entering a much more disturbing phase of this mess.
Originally posted by elcapitano75
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Personally I would choose to have 1000 floods over 1 nuclear pollution accident.
I agree, this stuff is nasty. And you can't just neatly sweep it up, burn it, or "corex-it"
I can't stand nuclear, even when i learned about it as a little kid, as long as i can remember i always thought this stuff is bad news. There's just too much toxic crap to deal with, even without these accidents.
Bad stuff man.