It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Originally posted by filosophia
Originally posted by Aggie Man
For those wanting the link to the jihadist website being referenced....Google it
It took me all of 2-minutes to find it.
Oh, care to post the link or should I just trust you have it.
No, I don't care to post it. And, quite frankly, your trust, or distrust, in me means nothing.
Originally posted by filosophia
reply to post by Chadwickus
I'd just like to say that there is, or was a website and not just a chat room
news.bbc.co.uk...
The most recent, posted on a website known to be used by Islamist militants, strongly criticised the US and coalition forces in Iraq and ordered a jihad, or holy war, against them.
So there you have it, the terrorists do have a website but the link is not given. This news article is from 2004, meaning they've been carrying on with this fake al qaeda website without providing a link for 7 years.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
As you say, it could be anybody saying these things, so why bother with sources you won't accept?
Originally posted by Javel
Here is the site (I think) www.atahadi.com...
Somali young American who went to fight in Somalia. Disorders and mysterious echoed by some Somali leaders of the religious and secular spheres in the interviews that took place in the documentary. To some extent, in the opening ceremony is attracting a wide variety of every society. Therefore, many applauded for its content, while others extolled the director of this film is crude and information gathered by the minute from the media and advocates of left-wing conspiracy, including, but limit ourselves to: Washington, FBI, and of course some quotes from sources FADHI KU DIRIR
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by boondock-saint
If you can’t be bothered researching it properly yourself then that’s your problem not mine.
Originally posted by usernameconspiracy
Do you comprehend the difference between using a website and having a website. I use plenty of websites, but I have no wbsites.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by filosophia
Here is an article saying an al qaeda website tracks back to Maryland
whatreallyhappened.com...
EXACTLY !!!
NSA Headquarters
Ft. Meade Maryland
so Al Queda links back to NSA huh ???
Is this the source we are supposed to trust
they say is Al Queda ???
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by boondock-saint
A cop out?
I've posted the original, original source, old mate up there thought that it was an Al Qaeda site ROFL!!
news.siteintelgroup.com...
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by boondock-saint
A cop out?
I've posted the original, original source, old mate up there thought that it was an Al Qaeda site ROFL!!
news.siteintelgroup.com...
The pointy end of the information.
You have to pay though...perhaps a little patience is warranted on your part? The news broke 2 hours ago.
Here look you can follow them on twitter too:
twitter.com...#!/siteintelgroup
People have asked for clarification there already, so let's see what they say...
Originally posted by zcflint05
Okay, so can we put the whole conspiracy thing behind us now? It's only fair.
SITE was miraculously able to obtain the highly suspicious September 2007 Bin Laden video tape before it was released by the so-called Al-Qaeda group who had made it.
SITE has been positively endorsed by Blackwater USA, the infamous military contractor co-founded by former Navy Seal Erik Prince that was found to have been involved in several massacres of innocent Iraqi civilians.
SITE’s continued existence relies on fleecing the American taxpayer by way of contracts with the U.S. government and constantly invoking and hyping the hugely exaggerated threat of alleged Al-Qaeda groups in the Middle East.
SITE’s claim that “Al-Qaeda” has confirmed the official White House version of events concerning the death of Bin Laden, thereby lending presumed credence to a narrative that has quickly attracted derision and suspicion even amongst mainstream journalists, is about as credible as if Barney the Purple Dinosaur had made a statement assuring us that Osama was killed on Sunday evening.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
He did not have any need for kidney dialysis, he might have had diabetes and probably kidney stones but n dialysis. It was a claim made by the CIA that turned out to be a mistake.
I think now, frankly, he is dead for the reason he is a ... kidney patient
Musharraf said Pakistan knew bin Laden took two dialysis machines into Afghanistan. "One was specifically for his own personal use," he said.
"I don't know if he has been getting all that treatment in Afghanistan now. And the photographs that have been shown of him on television show him extremely weak. ... I would give the first priority that he is dead and the second priority that he is alive somewhere in Afghanistan."
He is using very reasonable deductive reasoning, (but) we don't know that bin Laden is dead," said the official, who requested anonymity. We don't have remains or evidence of his death So it is a decent and reasonable conclusion...
Originally posted by kevinunknown
I know you are wrong because I seem to be one of the few people on ATS with a ability to critically evaluate sources.
Not only does this not have the link to the original source but this looks like a fake news website, when you click on the news link it takes you to a page to pay them to monitor your internet against boogey man terrorists