It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by katndew
I find it odd there were so many replies but not many flags on this.
The panel heard about an hour of arguments, then took the matter under submission.
Originally posted by Skippy1138
When are people going to wake up and say something's just not "right" with this man.......Everything about his man stinks to high heaven...
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Originally posted by Skippy1138
When are people going to wake up and say something's just not "right" with this man.......Everything about his man stinks to high heaven...
What's "not right?"
Please provide elucidation. Thanks
Originally posted by Danbones
In the US Using a social security number that belonged to a dead man is a felony
period...
a citizen of the US would know that
www.obamaconspiracy.org...edit on 2-5-2011 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
I have looked at various filings available from the courts, and I have not personally seen the list of 39 Social Security numbers. What I have seen is various lists of names similar to Obama, mostly living at Obama’s former Chicago address and all having the same Social Security number. From where I sit, I have no documentation available to me that Taitz’s claim is true, and if it is, I would question the accuracy of these databases, which are essentially credit reporting databases aggregated from various sources usually without any verification. We do not know what matching criteria were used to say that these were our president Barack Obama. It all seems rather far fetched.
While it is not certain that the Social Security number “that he used most often” according to Taitz is really the President’s, I suspect that it probably is. Taitz is correct that the “042″ series of numbers was indeed assigned to Connecticut, and Connecticut is not Hawaii. As far as I know, President Obama never resided in Connecticut.
If there is any clear evidence of fraud, it is the 1890 date that Taitz flouts. First, if the SSN was really for a person born in 1890, that person would be dead. The Social Security death index doesn’t list this number, so we can presume that the 1890 date is bogus. However, there is more direct evidence that it’s wrong and Taitz knows it. In her own court filing in Barnett v. Obama (page 5) she shows where the 1890 date comes from. The document says:
Dates of Birth Associated with SSN:
1890
08/04/1961
04/08/1961
Obviously the third is a typographical error on the correct date (the second) and 1890 is just database garbage. Which is the more likely date of birth from the preceding list? If you are convinced that everything Obama does is a fraud, then the first entry is the one to pick. If you’re looking for the real answer, you pick the one that makes sense, the President’s actual date of birth.
While Taitz claims that the SSN Obama uses “was issued to another individual”, she never says who that individual is, and this is because the record for that SSN belongs to none other than Barack Obama himself, as we see from Orly’s own filing.
What about the Connecticut number series? It’s an interesting question, but there’s no law that says you have to get your SSN from a Social Security office in the state where you reside. Nowadays, they are all processed centrally and the assignment is based on the zip code of the return address. My guess (and that’s all it is) is that Obama got his SSN as a child living in Indonesia and the application was just processed in Connecticut. A commenter here made another suggestion and that is that Obama’s return address was mistyped, the initial “9″ typed as a “0″ which would turn a Hawaiian zip code into one from Connecticut.
Originally posted by UcDat
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Originally posted by Skippy1138
When are people going to wake up and say something's just not "right" with this man.......Everything about his man stinks to high heaven...
What's "not right?"
Please provide elucidation. Thanks
How about the fact he's cousins with bush?
Originally posted by UcDat
or maybe its the fact he cant produce even a decent copy of a BC.
New data released by The Washington Post shows President Obama's decision last week to release his long-form birth certificate may have successfully erased doubts among many about whether he was born in the United States
Originally posted by UcDat
or that things have gotten even worst since he took the throne.
Originally posted by UcDat
or that everything he says is a lie cant even get OBL right
Originally posted by UcDat
or just cause he's an obvious puppet of the elites?
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Only an imbecile would believe otherwise with all the credible, erudite confirmations. Even Al Qaeda has acknowledged it. Pakistan has 3 former OBL wives in custody and they are chatting like Joan Rivers. (3 wives???? The Seals did him a favor. )
The SINGLE FACT that President Obama eliminated OBL will etch his place in American history forever and undoubtedly insure a 2nd term. Might as well get used to it.