Taitz Thrown Off MSNBC For Bringing Up Obama's Social Security Number

Here is why Orly Taitz was thrown off the show.... because of the Truth...Obama's illegal use of a social security number - a felony

She was showing results from the Freedom of Information request that anyone can get of Barack Hussein Obama's Selective Service registration, with the social security number 042-68-4425.

Private Investigator explains Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants

Did you know that by several reports there are something on the order of 17-18 Barack Obamas with SS #'s that come up when a Lexus Nexus search is done? How does this result affect your stand? Does it?

Do you KNOW for a fact that there wasn't a relative or friend in CT who filled out the form for him? Do you?

Did you know that Obama's place of residence at the time he would've applied had a zip code that was identical to the zip for Hartford CT - differing in only the first number ('9" versus"0"). Is there any chance a sloppy "9" could've been mistaken for a "0" by the SS admin processor? No? No chance in hell huh?

Well, I guess you've got it all figured out then. Me personally, I'll wait until the ONLY authority on the subject addresses it - the Social Security Admin. Until then, it's just an interesting question - nothing more. If you want to argue that the SS admin ISN'T the only authority - then you'll have to make that argument to a blank screen because I don't see anyone else with the expertise to comment authoritatively on the subject.

Originally posted by imitator
Here is why Orly Taitz was thrown off the show.... because of the Truth...Obama's illegal use of a social security number - a felony

She was showing results from the Freedom of Information request that anyone can get of Barack Hussein Obama's Selective Service registration, with the social security number 042-68-4425.

Private Investigator explains Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants

When did having a CT SSN become a felony? Can you show me that law?

Originally posted by userid1
Did you know that by several reports there are something on the order of 17-18 Barack Obamas with SS #'s that come up when a Lexus Nexus search is done? How does this result affect your stand? Does it?

Yes, as you may know most of those SS#'s link to nothing other than his name, those where probably created by someone to deliberately flood the data base.

BUT....There is official evidence for SS# 042-68-4425. Just get a FOIA request and see for yourself. It's an official government record that shows Barack Obama using the social security number 042-68-4425.

The dude is a fraud....

Originally posted by userid1
Do you KNOW for a fact that there wasn't a relative or friend in CT who filled out the form for him? Do you?

Did you know that Obama's place of residence at the time he would've applied had a zip code that was identical to the zip for Hartford CT - differing in only the first number ('9" versus"0"). Is there any chance a sloppy "9" could've been mistaken for a "0" by the SS admin processor? No? No chance in hell huh?

I doubt it...

Did you KNOW that Obama's maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham worked in a Hawaii Courthouse, who could of had access to SS# for Obama to "adopt" as his own? Do you?

Originally posted by Sinnthia
When did having a CT SSN become a felony? Can you show me that law?

If it's connected to a man born in 1890, then where there's smoke, there's usually a fire.

Originally posted by imitator
BUT....There is official evidence for SS# 042-68-4425. Just get a FOIA request and see for yourself. It's an official government record that shows Barack Obama using the social security number 042-68-4425.

Which Barack Obama?

Originally posted by imitator
If it's connected to a man born in 1890, then where there's smoke, there's usually a fire.

Boy that sure is some "if" you are hanging your hat on, aint it. So you do not know but you sure are hopin. I get it.

Originally posted by userid1
Do you KNOW for a fact that there wasn't a relative or friend in CT who filled out the form for him? Do you?

Did you know that Obama's place of residence at the time he would've applied had a zip code that was identical to the zip for Hartford CT - differing in only the first number ('9" versus"0"). Is there any chance a sloppy "9" could've been mistaken for a "0" by the SS admin processor? No? No chance in hell huh?

I doubt it...

Did you KNOW that Obama's maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham worked in a Hawaii Courthouse, who could of had access to SS# for Obama to "adopt" as his own? Do you?

You are suggesting that his maternal grandmother worked in the probate section of the HI courts (a claim I have yet to see verified btw), and stole the SS # of a guy (presumably you're referring to Jean Ludwig) for Obama to use - Yes?

Explain to me then why she would steal the SS # of a man who died fully a year AFTER Obama filed for selective service? How would she get that info about Ludwig working in the probate offices unless Ludwig was dead? Why would she give it to him AFTER he'd already used it for the Selective Service application filed a year earlier?

I spent all of 5 minutes on google for this. Now, just consider what would have happened if YOU had spent those 5 minutes researching instead of me. Would you have put yourself out there like that?

As to your assertion - "I doubt it."

Can't help you Sinnthia, your Marxist Hero is a FRAUD...

Originally posted by userid1
You are suggesting that his maternal grandmother worked in the probate section of the HI courts (a claim I have yet to see verified btw), and stole the SS # of a guy (presumably you're referring to Jean Ludwig) for Obama to use - Yes?

The theory is the grandmother wanted to gain access to the SS# office to steal numbers for Obama, there are reports that she did some form of work at a Hawaii Courthouse.

Originally posted by userid1
Explain to me then why she would steal the SS # of a man who died fully a year AFTER Obama filed for selective service? How would she get that info about Ludwig working in the probate offices unless Ludwig was dead? Why would she give it to him AFTER he'd already used it for the Selective Service application filed a year earlier?

Maybe you should add another 5 minutes to your google search:

Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form
www.debbieschlussel.com... registration-raises-serious-questions/

EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama’s Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions

Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form
On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as “B“. On this particular Form 1,

All your answers have been answered.... give it up!!! Obama is a fraud, he is guilty of fraudulent crimes and should be punished!

reply to post by imitator


So...

1 - You're willing to stain the reputation of a woman who is dead (conveniently for you as she can't defend herself) to suggest that she:
A - worked in a Hawaii courthouse ("theoretically as you said) - but supply no actual proof
B - Did nefarious things with other people's SS #'s, - but supply no actual proof

2 - You're now suggesting that Obama had someone inside the selective service admin alter a selective service application - AND keep quiet about it?

He's able to get ALL this accomplished, but according to birthers he's unable to produce a BC that "isn't an obvious forgery" - despite two attempts - 3 years apart. This is your claim?

reply to post by userid1


1. You got it all wrong, it's not me that created this info, just google Obama's maternal grandmother information.

2. Again I did not create this info. I only showed you a source about Obama’s altered Selective Service info.

The fact is, I have nothing to do with this information, it's all out there waiting for you to judge for yourself.

All I see is information that leads to deception and fraud, maybe you should show some evidence to counter that.

Originally posted by imitator
The fact is, I have nothing to do with this information, it's all out there waiting for you to judge for yourself.

And all of it is completely void of any supporting evidence. They’re just unfounded allegations and conspiracy theories.

If on some website out there it is claimed you are a pedophile can I claim here on ATS that there’s “information that leads” to you being a pedophile, and then deny any responsibility for making that claim because “I have nothing to do with this information, it’s all out there waiting for you to judge for yourself”?

All I see is information that leads to deception and fraud, maybe you should show some evidence to counter that.

The burden of proof is on those making the positive assertions and accusations.

You have presented nothing credible or tenable.

reply to post by aptness


Your wrong too, I'm not responsible for this information, I did not create it.
As well you show no evidence to counter the information.

So your saying everything is not credible or tenable?

Then show me how the Freedom of Information is not credible?
Show me that a man born in 1890 did not own that SS# ?
Show me that his Selective Service was not altered?
Show me his actual BC?

Good luck with that....

Originally posted by imitator
reply to post by userid1

 

1. You got it all wrong, it's not me that created this info, just google Obama's maternal grandmother information.

So you didn't create it, but you believe and support the idea of ripping apart a dead woman's reputation - particularly with no facts to support it? Is that a fair enough "adjustment" to cover your basic position?

2. Again I did not create this info. I only showed you a source about Obama’s altered Selective Service info.

So, you didn't create it but you believe and support the theory that Obama had enough juice in 1990 to impose his will on the selective service admin to fake his application? But as president, he doesn't have enough power to create a flawless BC - not once, but twice? That's what you're suggesting you believe here?

That's the argument that makes perfect sense to you and based on this info you're willing to say "All your answers have been answered.... give it up!!! Obama is a fraud, he is guilty of fraudulent crimes and should be punished!"

The fact is, I have nothing to do with this information, it's all out there waiting for you to judge for yourself.

And it's apparent that you've made up your mind - meanwhile I haven't made up my mind, and I'd like more info before doing so. It would seem that if anything, I'm the more skeptical of the two of us - and isn't that an odd turn of events?

Originally posted by userid1
Did you know that by several reports there are something on the order of 17-18 Barack Obamas with SS #'s that come up when a Lexus Nexus search is done? How does this result affect your stand? Does it?

wait are you saying there are 17-18 people named Barack Hussein Obama alive right now? And how many are named Barack Hussein Obama II ?

reply to post by filosophia


www.westernjournalism.com... /

The "Western Journalism Center" is essentially the parent company of WND - so why should I doubt it?

en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by userid1
but you believe and support the idea of ripping apart a dead woman's reputation

Nope, I said it was a theory... and that theory is on the web, I did not create it.

Originally posted by userid1
you believe and support the theory that Obama had enough juice in 1990 to impose his will on the selective service admin to fake his application?

So far you provided no evidence to counter that... if so let me know!

Originally posted by userid1
But as president, he doesn't have enough power to create a flawless BC - not once, but twice? That's what you're suggesting you believe here?

If you think he created 2 flawless BC, then so be it...... all I saw was a hacked PDF, seen his family and on youtube saying he was from Kenya and some old man with his SS#

Originally posted by userid1
And it's apparent that you've made up your mind - meanwhile I haven't made up my mind, and I'd like more info before doing so. It would seem that if anything, I'm the more skeptical of the two of us - and isn't that an odd turn of events?

If you show some evidence to the contrary I'll change my mind.... but you haven't.
Until then I'm finished with this subject. --Good luck.

Originally posted by imitator

Originally posted by userid1
but you believe and support the idea of ripping apart a dead woman's reputation

Nope, I said it was a theory... and that theory is on the web, I did not create it.

Originally posted by userid1
you believe and support the theory that Obama had enough juice in 1990 to impose his will on the selective service admin to fake his application?

So far you provided no evidence to counter that... if so let me know!

Originally posted by userid1
But as president, he doesn't have enough power to create a flawless BC - not once, but twice? That's what you're suggesting you believe here?

If you think he created 2 flawless BC, then so be it...... all I saw was a hacked PDF, seen his family and on youtube saying he was from Kenya and some old man with his SS#

Originally posted by userid1
And it's apparent that you've made up your mind - meanwhile I haven't made up my mind, and I'd like more info before doing so. It would seem that if anything, I'm the more skeptical of the two of us - and isn't that an odd turn of events?

If you show some evidence to the contrary I'll change my mind.... but you haven't.
Until then I'm finished with this subject. --Good luck.

edit on 6-5-2011 by imitator because: (no reason given)

The accusations are YOURS/Birthers - it's up to you to provide compelling evidence for them - not us. That's the way it works in court AND in life. So far you haven't.

You misread my comment about the BCs - read it again.

reply to post by userid1


And STILL you have nothing to add to the contrary....

The compelling evidence is an altered Birth Certificate in PDF format, an altered Selective Service Registration form, his social security number belongs to some French guy, and his family on youtube say's he was from Kenya...

That's enough compelling reasons to take in court....

speaking of court..


This case was argued May 2nd, 2011 in Courtroom One of the Richard H. Chambers United States Courthouse in Pasadena, California

Anyway, until you have something better to add, I'm finished with this subject and sticking with UFO threads from now on. I have a better chance of seeing a UFO than seeing Obama's true identity.

Originally posted by imitator
That's enough compelling reasons to take in court....
speaking of court.. This case was argued May 2nd, 2011 in Courtroom One of the Richard H. Chambers United States Courthouse in Pasadena, California

You actually think that oral argument shows the birthers in good light? One birther lawyer is arguing that the President of the United States might not even be a citizen, and the other is... well... Orly Taitz.

I’m also unsure what you think that particular lawsuit means, but there have been over 80 birther lawsuits. Can you guess how many of them have had any success? I’ll give you a hint: it’s an oval-shaped number.

Even if you had undeniable proof, the courts couldn’t do anything, once the new President is in office. Only Congress can remove a sitting President. The courts have said this over and over, but the birthers continue to file lawsuits, incapable of comprehending the decisions.

Anyway, until you have something better to add, I'm finished with this subject and sticking with UFO threads.

I think that’s very wise. The UFO field is more likely to yield results than the birthers

I find it odd there were so many replies but not many flags on this. It appears to me he is cutting her off because he doesn't want her to explain her point. She stated that they already did not let her explain a different time which is why she was trying to point out some evidence first. She just didn't get to it fast enough, lol. I think he looked like he was helping to avoid talking about any facts and Orly looked like she had proof of some. Ends up I did look her up and she is in fact able to prove her points. News clips like this is exactly why I stopped watching the news and turned to alternative sources. Hopefully, many others will start seeing these clips for what they are also.

Originally posted by katndew
I think he looked like he was helping to avoid talking about any facts and Orly looked like she had proof of some.

oops I meant "like he was trying to avoid talking about any facts"