It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by micpsi
Originally posted by Skerrako
reply to post by welshbeliever
His birth certificate was printed on a computer.
Thus, it is scanable, but that doesn't mean it was tampered with
Oh look! when you move everything but the words, they line up too perfectly it means it was edited! No- it means it was printed from a computer
Birthers are like the U.S. economy, they've already hit the wall, just haven't realized it yet.
The very fact it was printed from a computer means it's only as good as the information in the database. That's why it is not proof - Obama's mother could have "embellished" some of the information she (or whoever) gave to the Department of Health for very good reasons (e.g., hide the fact that Obama was born in Kenya, as his grandmother says). Only the original crinkled piece of paper signed by doctors in ink will suffice. Anything else can be forged or be based upon false information.
Geddit it now?
Originally posted by atomicn
Did black people ever request the long form birth certificate of former president Bush? lets all masquerade and talk like this has nothing to do with his color of skin. No. Because he is a "Muslim", a "terrorist" a "racist" a "communist", a "socialist".
All which Obama has been called.
"birthers" code word for "racist"
A memo dated August 31, 1961 from William Wood of Immigration and Naturalization Services indicates that Barack Obama, Sr, was attending the University of Hawaii on a student visa and that a son, Barack Obama, II, was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961.
Back up one page. I made at least 2, count em 2 posts without race involved, and for the record I am not a birther nor a non-birther. I am a realist.
Originally posted by Drala
YOU SHOULD OFFER TO CLOSE THIS THREAD>>>YOU KNOW THE HOSPITAL WAS NAMED WRONG? NAME WAS CHANGED IN 1978... his BC has the 1978 name not the 1961 name....its getting overwhelming that this thread should be your "ANTI_BIRTHER" last thread...lol YOU SAID IT, SHOE IS ON OTHER FOOT NOW...its layered, when you zoom in some of the lettering pixelates and some does not, and the hospital name is 17 years in the future...COME ON LOL...took him how long to produce it?
Originally posted by xavi1000
One of the most greatest human features is when you admit when you are wrong .
Birthers , post here and admit and let this be the last birther thread !!!edit on 27-4-2011 by xavi1000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dakota1s2
No! This snapshot of a so called long form BC won't do for me. To much other evidence leaning otherwise is out here. For example why does it take two years to release it? Why has Nigerian officials stated he was born there?
Obviously now there is a little evidence, but meeting the eligibility requirement has been rediciously low, covered up by a partisan MSM, and If the Donald had gotten the evidence--not CNN-- it would be more beliveable.
No, I will remain skeptical until he releases all transcripts, documents, and any other evidence that he is a natural born citizen, including his transcripts from all schools he attended. I will not believe Obama is not hiding something He's stonewalled for two years. Sorry but I remain suspicious.
By the way, remember all the hullaballu about John McCain not being a citizen? His parents were both US citizens and were in the Military and the Lefties still wanted to make that an issue.
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
reply to post by Skerrako
Not the actual inaguration god, he released all his info once he became the president and obama didnt