It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OhioPariah
I quit reading when water was so quickly glossed-over because it covers 74% of the earth. I am an environmental scientist, and I can assure you, even of the water we can drink (only 2.5% of the Earth's water is fresh; of that, 70% is inaccessible in the icecaps, deep aquifers, or as humidity and moisture) the water is so polluted by nitrates or halogenated solvents or gender-bending endocrine disruptors that it is impossible for a society to survive beyond a few generations without a significant loss of life.
Water is the key limiting factor here - and what we can actually get at, will kill us without extensive treatment and energy input. The earth absolutely has a K value, and our actions are lowering it. You don't need a global elitist conspiracy to see that.
Originally posted by 3dman7
The next time you're in a traffic jam and frustrated as hell, take that time to ponder a world with far fewer people in it.
Originally posted by pilotx
Originally posted by 3dman7
The next time you're in a traffic jam and frustrated as hell, take that time to ponder a world with far fewer people in it.
It is a good summary of a large percentage of sentiments expressed on this thread.
Yeah, how dare they be in My Way? Sterilization and death to them all! I am elite!
Respectfully, ignored.
Originally posted by die_another_day
Originally posted by rwfresh
Originally posted by die_another_day
Originally posted by rwfresh
reply to post by die_another_day
How about each person that requires a resource be allowed to creatively use the resource.
Or.. you distribute it the same way everything else is distributed. How do you think all the JUNK gets from China to the US Walmarts?? DAILY.
There is no distribution problem.
With property rights, courts, patents, and HOARDING behavior.
How can resources be "distributed?"
Suicidal behavior (Greed, hoarding, fear of lack of resources) are not consistent with reality. So maybe the first question would be how do we encourage reality? Or eliminate delusion? Just by living in reality and not propagating unreal myths like "overpopulation" is a start.edit on 18-4-2011 by rwfresh because: (no reason given)
There is no such thing as "fear of lack of resources."
Scarcity is what creates value.
Scarcity is what creates the market for people to exchange what they don't have in.
Originally posted by JessicaS
I keep wondering where this idea of over population keeps comming from, or the idea that we can't substain our own species.
Nevermind the fact that greed has put the planet in it's peroloius position in the first place
...
It's not the Earth we need to save.... The Earth will be just find after our exinction. WE WON'T!!
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Definition for the "limits to growth": what we the elite can control and dominate without working up too much of a sweat.
That definition will have to be made obsolete in order for humanity to survive...
Originally posted by AndrewJay
If overpopulation was a problem, which its not, how would you go about 'fixing' said problem? Because thats really what this thread is talking about. You have people that are living on this planet that literally hate you simply for being alive.... yet you defend them. I simply cannot understand the logic.
Originally posted by ViperChili
The problem with the overpopulation discussion is that the people who do not believe we are facing an overpopulation crisis cannot argue fact. They rely on emotion based arguments, which is the wrong path to take.
Emotion has no place in an intellectual debate, and whining about "oh, well we could power everything with Unicorn piss if it wasn't being held back by the evil powers that be blah blah blah" doesn't do any good since that isn't a reality in these current times.
Crying that "we cant let people starve!!!!!" , or "we cant just exterminate people!!!!" is 100% emotion and it has no logical fact behind it.
The fact is we can and should let people starve. That is exactly what happens when overpopulation of the ecosystem occurs.
Originally posted by 3dman7
Glad you took the effort to quote me and post the fact that you ignored my post!
Originally posted by ViperChili
reply to post by rwfresh
You whined about thousands of unpopulated hectares in India. Obviously the infrastructure isn't in place to use that land, or it simply isn't arable land. India is an old country, think if that land was prime for the pickin someone wouldn't have jumped on it by now?
Before we go on any further, I need to ask:
Are you coming at this from a religious angle? You mentioned spiritually fulfilled people in India and some of the "deadly sins".
Is religion the root of your argument?