We’re Not From The Milky Way Galaxy! We’re Sagittarians, Say Scientists! What Of Earth's Future

reply to post by OrionHunterX


Hmm, is anyone else seeing the silver lining in all this? Mars's atmosphere is becoming more dense because most of it's carbon locked in the ground(where scientist's think it is buried) is being released into it's atmosphere due to heating across the solar system.

That means it is going to become that much more within our reach to terraform Mars. Plow a small ice asteroid into the planet(small one and as slow as can be done) + human efforts to increase atmosphere density and bio-development= win.

Heck it makes more sense to fiddle with a planet on life support before we even begin to mess with our own planet(Mars could even become a testing ground for GM type plants).

Change can be a difficult thing, but not all change is inherently bad.

reply to post by OrionHunterX


Just like to say thanks for a wonderfully thought out thread and some great research.
we need more threads of this quality

S&F

I also got a sense that due to this the respective spiritual planes of these two galaxies were also starting to merge, albeit at a slower rate then the physical merging.

I saw this on space.com almost a year ago... i forgot about it though thank-you for reminding me
The part with the sun being from the Saggitarius Dwarf Galaxy thx..

I completely forget about this article i read and now you refreshed my memory i can't thank you enough!

I don't have time to read the thread Atm but i'll take a look at it tonight later on

I wonder, if we came from Sagittarius, if then there are more systems like ours left over from that galactic plane...

reply to post by Unity_99


That's the crux of what I found to be true of the stars of Sagittarius dwarf galaxy, is they are lower in iron content than most of the Milky Way, and clearly our sun, as a third generation star it is higher in iron content than some Milky Way stars, but MOST of Sag's stars. The point about angles was not supported, not supported to be aligned with Sag's plane or the Milky Way's equatorial plane but that's just a red herring. An accretion disc can form any which way in a galaxy, it doesn't have to align with anything.

The real thing that throws the claim out is we do have means to track our solar system's path around the center of the Milky Way, and we are in fact going around the plane, in an arm, of the Milky Way, not little Sag's.

Here's a link to the chemical metallicity distribution of the dwarf Sagittarius.

Sagittarius elemental makeup

Originally posted by solargeddon
Very interesting thread OP well done

One thing that struck me whilst reading is the impact on the quantum level, i.e the notion of particles being affected over distance, and how corresponding particles would behave here on earth, its a fascinating area of interest, and I haven't done it justice by trying to explain my position here, maybe someone can put it into more eloquent terms .

Yes, it said stars from Sagittarius impact our system. Maybe that is one reason for shooting stars. I believe that our evolution is guided by a Master Intelligence (Freemasons call it the Great Architect) and that the various lifewaves evolving on our planetary home make sense. The Theosophical Society teaches about the various evolving livewaves and the timetables. The OPs thread is a marvelous introduction to some new concepts. Even if we did not come from Sagittarius, we clearly have some interaction with it.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


The infinite variation and ratio of elements, and thus realities in our great universe astound me... Such a beautiful creation we live in...

One need only look within their own planet to see enough variation for this. Yet when I contemplate the degree of change accompanying the blending of galaxies... and even the effect it may have at the quantum level... I'm left punch drunk at the malleability of the objective universe, and the exponential variety of the respective subjective universes which accompany this.

In Soviet Russia, Milky Way eats you!

This is interesting but I don't see why we should be worried. It's going to take so long to happen I don't think it's a realistic danger. It's sort of like saying the sun is going to "burn out". Either way, just goes to show how little we know about our ultimate surroundings.

Originally posted by Mayura
reply to post by Jepic

 

Hehe... there may be more to this measly little life than you think. Next year is going to be of epic proportions...



P.S. Global warming is really going to kick up a notch once this planet turns into a star.

this PLANET doesn't have the mass or "fuel" to to create and sustain fusion and"turn into a star"

Good thread, for some reason after reading it, the movie star trek generations "Nexus" came to my mind.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3f6ab765597d.jpg[/atsimg]

I know a lot of people dont believe in this, but could the debree from Sagittarius possible be connected with "Ascension"? Similar to nexus?
If that's the case, I wouldn't worry.

S&F.

Six Billion years from now as I am sitting down to a, warm but yet cold.snack of anti-matter, just prior to watching episode 2,000,000.000.000.000.00.01 of the "Daily Show", I shall become quite irate when my cable goes out as a result of collision of the Universesss. (is more than one Universe a POD of Universe, I always get thet confused?]

I've never heard of this before! I had no idea that we were already mixed up with another galaxy. I also didn't know that Mars' ice caps had melted so much and it's atmosphere had increased so greatly. Why have I never heard that mentioned before...

This is amazing stuff, for sure.

reply to post by Jepic


It doesnt matter if its tomorrow or the next quadzillion years its still happening!

reply to post by Evanzsayz


What's still happening?

thanks for the stuff mate!!

Originally posted by john124
Been debunked on ATS many times before.

You're right. i think there was another thread, by Zorgon I guess like someone said, a few months ago.

But I guess duplicate threads are okay if they generate site hits. $$$

reply to post by Jepic


I guess when you're millions / billions of years old, you have plenty of time to post useless comments on a message board. Do you seriously have nothing better to do? If your mission in life is to try and prevent as many people as possible from reading these forums, you're doing a pretty good job...

reply to post by Time2Think


How the hell am I preventing people from reading this thread? WTF? Is there my name on the link of this thread saying: "Watch out! Do not enter this thread! Jepic is looming inside."

And it's none of your business to know if I have or haven't got anything better to do in my life.

You seriously just turned this into an anti-AGW thread?? Your science is TERRIBLE and has already been DEBUNKED.

FAIL