It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by Vicky32
Wow, that was actually a very informative article, perhaps even deserving it's own thread. Thanks for the link!
Originally posted by CountDrac
reply to post by Vicky32
i read it its wrong
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by The time lord
Originally posted by The time lord
Jews are considered bloodiness from the start of Adam, Jesus was a Jew and is considered a well smart teacher in today’s world.
I'm not sure what you mean by "considered bloodiness", but if one were to believe in Adam, then all of humanity is descended from him, not just Jews.
Text
According to the Bible all those who have faith in Christ are spiritually connected to Abraham, some bloodlines split into different tribes and some were given more blessings than others even if they have to put up with a lot of war on their shoulders. If the Jews are the Jews of old since the Roman times some can be traced back so they say then it makes sense that there is a gap between Arab race and the Jews of today, not only that it proof of their intelligence as a people to hold something the rest don't have.
Originally posted by The time lord
Einstine was of Jewish decent -
The Einsteins were non-observant Jews. Albert attended a Catholic elementary school from the age of five for three years.
Text
en.wikipedia.org...
Einstein may have been of jewish descent, but he certainly wasn't a jew. Or if you claim he was, then he was just as much of a jew as any of the Arabs (Semites) including Muhammad.
Text
He was not a Jew but he was the last of that family generation who must have had routes leading far off into humanity.
Originally posted by The time lord
God of the Bible praises his people with success, many are extremely intelligent, and many have larger foreheads than most people and have straight looking eyes, symmetry in their appearance but that you have to judge and look for your self, many scientists are said to have higher foreheads some call it brains.
I'll skip past the racism, because I'm pretty sure that God is not racist.
In Genesis 16:13-16 (years before Abraham's second son Isaac was born) the Angel of the Lord told Abraham's servant Hagar that her son Ishmael would be "...a wild donkey of a man, His hand will be against everyone, and everyone's hand will be against him; and he will live to the east of all his brothers."
So the Quran speaking against certain jews for what they did is offensive, but people calling the Arabs (the sons of Ishmael according to you) "a wild donkey of a man" is okay?
Text
It is okay to say it if his decendents ended up causing so much harm in the future especially against the Jews, the Angel said so as for all its worth it is a prophecy in it self because it has not happened yet in that moment.
Ishmael was jealous and mocked Sarah so she asked to send them away. Because he was born of Abraham God had some favour of him so it it is not all negative. But it is true today that they are against the West, Christianity, Jews their half brothers and them selves, they make the news because of it. the Bible predicts the nations of the endtimes being mostly Arab and there has been plenty of time since then for land to have changed races and bloodline but it has not.
It's depressing how much I've come to expect certain people (including you, unfortunately, time lord) to ALWAYS be misquoting and misrepresenting Quranic verses in their posts. For example, your quote where you said:
Qur'an 33:26 "Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before."
Is actually:
Surah Al-Ahzab 33:25-27
And Allah repulsed the disbelievers in their wrath: no advantage did they gain. Allah averted their attack on the believers. Allah is ever Strong, Mighty.
And He brought those of the People of the Scripture who supported them down from their fortresses, and cast panic into their hearts. Some ye slew, and ye made captive some.
And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.
The verse was talking about a specific event where the Jews aided the Meccans in a battle against Muslims, although the actual wording doesn't even mention the word "jews"! And "Allah made them leave their homes" is hugely different (deceitfully so) from "Allah brought them down from their fortresses".
And then there is your quote where you said (I am ignoring the Ibn Ishaq quotes, because muslims don't even consider that as scripture):
Qur'an 4:55 "Sufficient for the Jew is the Flaming Fire!"
Where the actual quote is:
Surah An-Nisa 4:54-55
For We bestowed upon the house of Abraham the Scripture and wisdom, and We bestowed on them a mighty kingdom.
And of them were some who believed therein and of them were some who turned away from it. Hell is sufficient for their burning.
Where again, the actual term "Jews" is not even used, and the verse can be understood to mean ALL of Abraham's children.
Text
Ok great now the translation is different, does not mean they are best buddies all of a sudden depends on which version we are speaking about it seems, and not only that it does not change the fact that one sentence about the Arabs in Genesis speaks volumes because it is true today and in history that Arabs can not stand the Jews or give them spiritual rights to their Holy places out of spite and conquest.
And so on.
Of course, as much as I've come to expect certain people to ALWAYS be misquoting and misrepresenting scripture, I've also come to expect those exact same people to turn a blind eye, or outright ignore it when I correct them. So it's probably no use having done it.
Of course, if you were quoting those verses in terms of a comparison between the religions of Judaism and Islam (which may have been the original purpose of this thread? I'm not sure), I'm pretty sure you're fully aware that the Hebrew Scriptures are just as vehement (probably more so) towards non-jewish religions.edit on 18-4-2011 by babloyi because: (no reason given)
Text
The Bible mentions these Nations or Cities in which they reside as being endtime enemies of Israel which will come to their destruction and judgements.
Originally posted by CountDrac
reply to post by Vicky32
i read it its wrong
1. For politicians, especially at the federal level: As soon as you say the word “Israel,” you must also say the word “security” and promise that the United States will always, always, always be committed to Israel’s security. If you occasionally label an action by the Israeli government “unhelpful,” you must immediately reaffirm the eternal U.S. commitment to Israel’s security.
2. For TV talking heads and op-ed pundits: If you criticize any policies or actions of the Israeli government, you must immediately add that Israel does, of course, have very real and serious security needs that have to be addressed.
3. For journalists covering the Israel-Palestine conflict for major American news outlets: You must live in Jewish Jerusalem or in Tel Aviv and take only occasional day trips into the Occupied Territories. So your reporting must inevitably be slanted toward the perspective of the Jews you live among. And you must indicate in every report that Jewish Israeli life is dominated by anxiety about security.
Originally posted by Zamini
reply to post by The time lord
The Bible mentions these Nations or Cities in which they reside as being endtime enemies of Israel which will come to their destruction and judgements.
The bible is a fairytale book.
Look, you can be offended if you wish but the reality is, that region has been in war since it became inhabited. The bible didn't predict squat, but you can sure pretend it did. The genocidal maniacs in power are doing so...so why not?