It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by tarifa37
edit to add: looks like the Sun and Telegraph came to their senses and retracted the articles.edit on 11-4-2011 by cripmeister because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DJKris
Originally posted by cripmeister
reply to post by tarifa37
edit to add: looks like the Sun and Telegraph came to their senses and retracted the articles.edit on 11-4-2011 by cripmeister because: (no reason given)
Yeah The Sun do seem to have, but I'm interested to know what you're implying with the facepalm and why you say "came to their sense" what point were you actually trying to make?
Originally posted by smurfy
Somewhere in the newly released FBI's pdf file on Roswell and other stuff, they have inked it over with the word bogus. There is a small mystery though in that, a member here was able to know at least two years ago, that it was considered bogus by the FBI.
Originally posted by IsaacKoi
Originally posted by smurfy
Somewhere in the newly released FBI's pdf file on Roswell and other stuff, they have inked it over with the word bogus. There is a small mystery though in that, a member here was able to know at least two years ago, that it was considered bogus by the FBI.
No mystery - the FBI released its UFO documents in the 1970s and they have been discussed in quite a few UFO books and in various documentaries.
The MJ-12 documents labelled "bogus" by the FBI have been available for years and the labelling of those documents as "bogus" has been referred to in several books.
All the best,
Isaac
edit on 11-4-2011 by IsaacKoi because: (no reason given)
This document has actually been discussed in UFO circles since the late 1990s, and a close reading reveals that agent Hottel is not endorsing or verifying any of the information presented in the memo; he's merely reporting what an Air Force investigator said that someone else told him about the crashed saucers. It's a third-hand report of a story.
Originally posted by tarifa37
Originally posted by Quasar_La-Zar
reply to post by SaturnFX
I mean think of it, if your an alien being all advanced in everything, what benefits would you have from talking to a civilization of primates? When you are at the zoo, do you try and talk to the monkeys because someday they might be able to talk back? No, you just observe and stay as quiet as possible, sounds believable to me.
Originally posted by DJKris
Honestly, where has this assumption come from that just because someone has this amazing technology that they much be this really advanced race who are so much better than us? It doesn't mean that at all, it simply means they've got a better mode of transport than us.