It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by wcitizen
Someone's eligibility to be president is NOT a private issue, it is a very, very public issue. It's a matter of NATIONAL SECURITY, no less.
Sure is. That is why there are people in place to take care of such things. I guess I missed it when all the previous presidents went door to door, IDs in hand to let each and everyone touch and feel it. I was certain they were vetted in the same manner as Obama by a select group of people who at least know what a birth certificate is. I remember one birther claiming Obama's BC was not real because his was green and hers was yellow. So when he gets to her house, he just stops being president, right? Your America sounds rather inefficient. We have a group of people that take care of that for us. If you have any valid reason to believe that those people failed in their duty, then by all means I would be greatly interested. 2.5 years in is not making it look so good though.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
[
A real person with a real concern would simply be interested in the facts.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
So why didn't the republicans expose him during the election? Bush senior used to run the CIA and Bush junior was the president. Are you saying they didn't know? Or are you saying it's some twisted scheme to fool really smart people?
Because the two NWO factions made a deal - it was supposed to be Hillary, but they opted for Obama groomed it seems as the Mahdi to apeal to the Islamic world - no coincidence that Sorros and Obamas fingerprints are all over the 'revolutions' in the Arab world.
Why - who knows, maybe they were faced with a Blackjack scenario from another faction (Sino/Soviet) - so Obongo was inserted to financially collapse the US instead -being inelligible is the gaurantee that either side can cancell the deal at any time - and that is why the media treats this as a 'hands off' issue.
Maybe Trump didnt read the script - maybe he is part of the cancellation process - we shall soon see!
Originally posted by aptness
Moreover, this lawsuit wasn’t dismissed by lack of standing. Expecting birthers to read the actual decisions of the Courts they are criticizing is asking too much.
HONOLULU – A Hawaii appeals court has rejected a man's request to "inspect and copy" President Barack Obama's birth certificate, saying the plaintiff failed to state a valid claim to having access to the document.
Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
I disagree. The neoconservatives didn't start this lie because he's a black man. They did it because they know that race is a wedge issue they could use to win over people with a racial bias.
Originally posted by tom502
This racist anti-birther crap is too much. It's obvious to me, the anti-birthers are the racists, and believe Obama is above the law, because he is black(or considered), and therefore not subject to honkey law. These Obamamaniacs are the say exremists that march in the street with the ISO, and CPUSA, and always take the side of the "poor black criminal", and are against the police. They want a totalitarian welfare socialist globalist state, and hate European culture, and Obama was/is their Messiah, non-white, and radical Marxist, or so they thought, as it seems he's just another capitalist suit, but still, he's the only messiah in offcie they have, so he is not subject to the "racist" honkey law, as a "black man". So, they will twist the truth and call anyone who questions anything about their Messiah as racist, when in fact, their team is the racists.
Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by filosophia
Really? I figured it was more because he had a bigger agenda that pursuing war criminals would impede. I don't agree with that decision but I hardly think they are in bed together on it. Please provide a source that backs this up.
Thanks.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
You cannot back this "fact" up in the other thread I asked you to back it up in so you come over here and repeating while continuing to deflect over there? Just saying things are facts do not make them facts. What you are pushing is a long debunked birther lie that anyone anywhere could just get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says you were born in Hawaii. You cannot back this claim up. You just can't do it. Please stop saying things you cannot back up. You do want to be taken seriously, don't you?
So you tell me, how did home birthers get a BC back then ?
I also notice quite a few days between birth and his supposed BC..
Why is that if he was born in a hospital ??
Originally posted by peter vlar
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
You cannot back this "fact" up in the other thread I asked you to back it up in so you come over here and repeating while continuing to deflect over there? Just saying things are facts do not make them facts. What you are pushing is a long debunked birther lie that anyone anywhere could just get a birth certificate from Hawaii that says you were born in Hawaii. You cannot back this claim up. You just can't do it. Please stop saying things you cannot back up. You do want to be taken seriously, don't you?
So you tell me, how did home birthers get a BC back then ?
I also notice quite a few days between birth and his supposed BC..
Why is that if he was born in a hospital ??
my birth certificate is dated 3 days after my birth. I must have been born in Kenya I guess.
I'd also like to add that I've never used my longform BC for anything, but I have done the following w/ my shortform BC
obtain a drivers license
obtain a passport
enlist in the army
obtain security clearances in the army
enroll in college
as proof of birth for every single civillian job I've ever had since I was 16
obtained a new SS card
a multitude of 'birthers' have argued that they can not use their short form BC's for any of these items,therefore Obama couldn't have been properly vetted but I call B.S.
Irregardless of all birther notions, I've yet to see anyone dispute the fact that Obama's mother was an american citizen. I hate to break it to all of you but no matter where in the world he was born, he's an american citizen by nature of his mothers citizenship. I know... facts get in the way of a good old fashioned hate fest but I'm a big fan of the whole 'deny ignorance' thing we're supposed to be doing around here
Originally posted by wcitizen
Obama's eligibility hasn't been verified. Sarcasm won't get around that fact.
Originally posted by OldCorp
Expecting Barry's apologists to read the OP article is too much to ask apparently, because it says why the lawsuit was dismissed in the very first paragraph
And this what you quoted from the article:
Originally posted by aptness
Moreover, this lawsuit wasn’t dismissed by lack of standing. Expecting birthers to read the actual decisions of the Courts they are criticizing is asking too much.
In other words, the lawsuit was dismissed based on the merits, not standing, exactly like I stated.
HONOLULU – A Hawaii appeals court has rejected a man's request to "inspect and copy" President Barack Obama's birth certificate, saying the plaintiff failed to state a valid claim to having access to the document.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
Fox news...
Wow, it must be true then..
Originally posted by wcitizen
Obama's eligibility hasn't been verified. Sarcasm won't get around that fact.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Er, that would make you an unreal person with an unreal concern because the fact is his eligibility was never properly scrutinised.
Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
I disagree. The neoconservatives didn't start this lie because he's a black man. They did it because they know that race is a wedge issue they could use to win over people with a racial bias.