It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OldCorp
Ever notice that most of these lawsuits are thrown out BEFORE they are even heard in court, and the reason given is invariably "the Plaintiff does not have 'standing' to file the suit?" What a crock of BS!
EVERY American has a vested interest in the eligibility of Obama as President. I think these judges have been paid off to keep the issue out of court, because if a plaintiff ever does present a discovery motion to the State of Hawaii it's GAME OVER for the Anointed One.
Originally posted by brokedown
If Obama was a natural born citizen we would not still be asking the question. Solid proof would have been presented by now.
You don’t keep paying lawyers to keep you out of court when a $14 dollar document can do the very same thing.
Wake up !
It is all just a sham. Sure the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, McCain all know it’s a sham, but they themselves are part of it.
You must still believe there is a difference between Republicans and Decorates.
It is the same beast, the two party system is just diversion.
A lot of people already know there is a long form B.C. that's not being shown but a lot of other people also claim that Obama already showed the birth certificate, well this proves there is another version that is not being released.
Care to cite the law that requires any President, or even President-elect, to show his “long form” birth certificate to the public?
Originally posted by filosophia
it proves Obama has not yet released the long form certificate
It’s so ironic that the birthers make grandiose claims about upholding the law, but if it’s to get what they want they criticize the courts for having to go through or be subjected to the regular processes of the judicial system.
Originally posted by OldCorp
Ever notice that most of these lawsuits are thrown out BEFORE they are even heard in court, and the reason given is invariably "the Plaintiff does not have 'standing' to file the suit?" What a crock of BS!
Originally posted by brokedown
If Obama was a natural born citizen we would not still be asking the question.
Solid proof would have been presented by now.
You don’t keep paying lawyers to keep you out of court
Two of the most basic principles of our legal system are ‘technicalities’ to the birthers.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
None I believe of the lawsuits have been heard on the merits of the cases - they have been dimissed on technicalities, juresdiction and standing without being heard.
You can pretend that others are holding you back and preventing you from reaching your goal, but the fact that you haven’t removed Obama from office is because the birthers have yet to provide any credible evidence to prove he wasn’t born in the United States.
That Obama shills will stonewall this to the bitter end
And judging by the rest of your post you decided to help the media. Not that they needed any more help.
It also goes without saying that the media have been told to make this a hands off story - and to treat it as fringe, 'looneyland' , racist, irrelevent etc.
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
Here's proof that it doesn't matter.....
Wait for it......
He is the President of the United States.
A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day. It's because state and federal law did not require anyone in Congress or elsewhere to check to see if Obama was a "natural born Citizen" under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, according the document.
The analysis by the Congressional Research Service, a research arm of the U.S. Congress, openly admits no one in the federal government, including Congress, ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. It explains no one was required to do so. Read more: Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted www.wnd.com...
The only document Obama has offered to suggest he is a natural-born citizen actually contradicts that suggestion. But, even worse, that document, the certification of live birth, the short-form certificate, is insufficient for purposes far less significant than establishing the constitutional eligibility for the presidency. For instance, try getting a passport with one. Try qualifying for Little League with one. Try getting a driver's license with one in most states. This is a digital document, subject to fraud, easy to obtain in Hawaii without a birth actually taking place, and the state of Hawaii has never even asserted that the document the Obama campaign released was an official Hawaiian document. There is one other piece of so-called "evidence" cited by Obama acolytes: much-to-do-about-nothing newspaper birth announcements. Since those birth announcements would be triggered automatically by the Hawaii health department with the acceptance of an application for a certification of live birth, they are totally irrelevant insofar as corroborating evidence. They only indicate that someone in Hawaii applied for a certification of live birth, a document Hawaii handed out to people with no evidence of an actual birth having taken place.