Obama's Faked Photographic Past For All To Clearly See.

Originally posted by exile1981

Originally posted by pshea38

Look to the right of Obama and you'll notice the guy there has his right arm (left from the viewers perspective) around Obama but is also holding the hand of the lady in front of his stomach.

Haha. Very well spotted. Any three armed abomination of nature.
(or possibly simply more evolved individuals.)
I almost feel embarassed for believing that all these photographs are
photoshopped fakeries...Almost.

Either post on the topic or refrain from posting in the thread at all.

Thanks.

reply to post by pshea38


If Obama was a reptilian, Muslim or born outside the country, why didn't the Bush administration out him so the GOP could win the presidency?

Or, as I asked before,

When the GOP had the reins of power and access/control over CIA/NSA, why didn't they expose Obamas birth lie and prevent him from becoming president? Why did they make up stuff instead of using what birthers call "real" evidence?

It would have been a slam dunk.

Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
So you are telling me that ALL of the photos that have ever been taken where the subject is not looking at the camera are photoshopped?

So because one person in a photo has a bigger head than the others means that he's photoshopped in?

Would somebody be so kind as to show me a link that PROVES these are official photos and exactly where they came from? No? Ok.

This thread is almost as bad as the ones that copy and paste sound bites and try to make it appear that he's saying these things.

You [snip] birthers. Keep trying.

Oh, btw........I am on the Internet, and I use Photoshop. So I can now claim (by your logic) that I am a professional photoshopper......Ok. I am a professional photoshopper.

But seriously, when I saw the word reptilian in the link I just about pissed myself. Then I closed the page with my face in my palm.

edit on 6/4/11 by masqua because: Removed derogatory term toward those considered in the camp of 'birthers'

What sort of ramblings are these?
I see no relevence in any of your above disconnected, taken out of context ramblings.
It is not one anomaly than proves a fraud but each taken in conjunction with the next.

Another ridiculer i see.
'But seriously, when I saw the word reptilian in the link I just about pissed myself. Then I closed the page with my face in my palm.'
Although this article is by a different author, would you care to explain what we are
seeing in the analysed photograph, instead of just putting your face in your palm.
btw... are you sure it was your face?

I'm still waiting for proof? Anybody?

Can anybody prove definitively that these are faked photos, or that they are taken from the originals?

Why would anybody expect us to believe the analysis of a picture of a picture copied from a picture on the INTERNET? Are you really gonna base your arguments over these?

Nowhere in the link does the author even show a single shred of evidence. It's based on conjecture from an "apparent professional". I actually do use photoshop on a daily basis, and what this guy is saying are things any novice would be able to say after only 2 days of photoshopping.

So again, somebody, anybody, please show me some evidence other than statements and opinions.

By the way....I don't like Obama either, yet you people are making me defend him with your outrageous claims. It's downright embarassing to see fellow ATS'ers act like this. Just look at all the off topic flags. And who's getting them?

Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by pshea38

 

If Obama was a reptilian, Muslim or born outside the country, why didn't the Bush administration out him so the GOP could win the presidency?

Or, as I asked before,

When the GOP had the reins of power and access/control over CIA/NSA, why didn't they expose Obamas birth lie and prevent him from becoming president? Why did they make up stuff instead of using what birthers call "real" evidence?

It would have been a slam dunk.

[snip]
If you believe in the two party system and them actually being at war with each other than yes they likely would think that republicans would do everything they could to keep obama out of power. Basically, to ask this question you must be one of the few ATSers who believe that the US political system is legitimate and honest and that the sides are really "fighting it out".

Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by pshea38

 

We have a black president. Get over it.

Riddle me this,

When the GOP had the reins of power and access/control over CIA/NSA, why didn't they expose Obamas birth lie and prevent him from becoming president? Why did they make up stuff instead of using what birthers call "real" evidence?

That would have guaranteed victory for the GOP.

Logic wins.

WTF. What are you trying to insinuate?
I am not from the states and i have always viewed all people as being equal.
I was delighted when obama became president, hoping that, due to the historical oppression
of the black people, he would innately tend to stand up for the underdog.
Forgive my ignorance but what does GOP stand for?
I, for one, am aware that no-one becomes president unless the hands behind the scenes
wants it. Obama is a puppet and a means to an end.
The rottenchilds were the main sponsors and promotors of obama.
Enough said.

I, for one, fail to see your logic.

reply to post by pshea38


How can you not see the logic in that statement.

If the Grand Ol Party A.K.A Republicans, actually had any evidence of him not being born here, they would have been all over it. If any of this crap were true, he would not have gotten into office in the first place.

Seems pretty logical to me.

reply to post by KnowledgeIsPowre


Bad assumption on your part. How about an answer to my question instead of deflecting it?

To suggest that only folks on the Internet could figure out he was born in another country is like saying that the GOP has access to less data than us.

It's like saying he only fooled the smart people.

reply to post by CastleMadeOfSand


[snip]

Ok, so if a person with two days of photoshop experience can say these things and you use photoshop everyday you should be able to explain why this is bunk. Ignoring nonphotoshop related points, please explain why all points made through actual photoshop technique are meaningless to proving forgery. For each photo the author says what each technique is used to reveal and what it means. The burden of proof is on you.

I dont see anything wrong with these photographs, except the basketball one, it doesnt even look like him haha.

but there are no extra arms, and the wedding ring? that is one giant wedding ring, looks more like some sort of championship ring or school ring rather then a wedding band.

the pixelation due to compiling? uhm... unless you have a ,jpeg file with alteast 150 dpi and you enlarge it, like say...taken from the internet where they are normally at 72 dpi, of course you are going to get pixelation. take any image of the internet and zoom in, yeah.. guess what. pixels everywhere.

this thread is very very reaching

Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by pshea38

 

If Obama was a reptilian, Muslim or born outside the country, why didn't the Bush administration out him so the GOP could win the presidency?

Or, as I asked before,

When the GOP had the reins of power and access/control over CIA/NSA, why didn't they expose Obamas birth lie and prevent him from becoming president? Why did they make up stuff instead of using what birthers call "real" evidence? It would have been a slam dunk.

I refer you to knowledgeIsPowre's post above. That is my stance also.
There is no party politics, just the powers behind the parties politics.
Everything else is deception and lies.
All politicians are allowed to rise.
The higher they rise, the more they are corrupted.
An immutable law in my book.
Both bush and kerry were members of the skull and bones secret society.
Does any more need to be said?

reply to post by pshea38


No insinuation intended. But you are right, I should not have directed it at you. Forgive me.

I firmly believe that the majority of the BS stories about Obama are based on lies conjured up by bigots and racists. I also feel that those who fall for the deception are pawns used to play us off of each other. Falling for these theories serves no good purpose and only embarrasses those who propagate them.

To think thar Obama didn't have enemies in government that would have exposed him is naive. To say he was a pawn of the bankers ignores the fact that the GOP carries water for the rich and Obama does not benefit them.

Again,

When the GOP had the reins of power and access/control over CIA/NSA, why didn't they expose Obamas birth lie and prevent him from becoming president? Why did they make up stuff instead of using what birthers call "real" evidence?

Are the PTB that stupid?

reply to post by Mike.Ockizard


I answered your question. It isn't my fault you are unwilling to make assumptions that the US political system may not be exactly what you are told to believe. It is almost surprising that you are an ATS member and making the assumption that everything is on level.

Lets look it from another perspective. If you think the GOP had this information, you must assume the democrats had it as well. You are telling me that the democrats would run a presidential candidate knowing that he is a fraud and know that the GOP know he is a fraud too? The only way he'd make it out of the gates is if they were both in on it (or if only a few people knew on each side and kept it secret).

Do you see how your assumption that if republicans knew this Obama wouldn't be president is irrelevant?

reply to post by pshea38


The only deception and lie here is the one perpetrated by the GOP during the election cycle in order to fire up their base.

Wake up.

reply to post by boondock-saint

in the pic where it looks like he is graduating, can somebody explain to me why everyone in the background is looking away from Obama getting his handshake. They're all looking over to the left of the pic. hmmmmm

Im guessing thats because the people in the background are a choir or something like it....looking and focusing on the crowd in attendance like they would supposed to be not the person on the stage. Another reason I believe this is........when do you ever see people taking photos of a graduation ceremony from behind the stage looking out towards the audience?

Obviously it was someone from the audience taking the photo towards the stage and choir in the background in my opinion....one they are all female I believe and are wearing the same outfit. Some standing and the ones in front sitting. Now they could also be his female classmates waiting for their turn to go up and recieve their dogwood...again looking at the people in the audience instead of Obama.......