It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fordrew
Obama had friends right and fellow classmates that could vouch for his presence at graduation.
Originally posted by fordrew
I must say I found this to be a very interesting thread.
....can be explained by: 1, The simple fact that these are jpg files of pictures of pictures on the Internet.
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
Meaning- The same person pointing out the photo errors, could be the same person who did the Photoshopping in the first place.
Originally posted by i am just saying
koolaid drinkers that can't accept the forgery even when they are slapped in the face with it.
Originally posted by ReluctantBlossom
reply to post by boondock-saint
Because you get the handshake AFTER the diploma...They are probably looking at the person just behind him getting their diploma.
I think someone is grasping at straws...His grandpa's second arm is around his shoulders....Show me where you see another arm in that pic cause it isn't there.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
In addition to being anti-Obama, I'm also anti hoax and anti Partisan nonsense. This is the worst kind of hoax and nonsense I've seen.
Considering all the lies Obama has told and his transparent history of buying votes with taxpayers money, why do you need to resort to stuff that makes you look like a fool? All your doing is helping him out.
Originally posted by pshea38
Here are just a couple of pictures and quotes.
Photo 3: Analysis
Stanley Armour Dunham was reported to have died on February 8, 1992, so he could not have been in a photo which simultaneously includes Obama's wedding ring, obtained (and worn) on or about October 18, 1992. If this is a genuine photo taken in 1983, Obama would have actually been wearing his wedding ring prematurely—by 9 and 1/2 years.
The most glaring anomaly is the fact that his grandfather appears to be suffering from a severe anatomical distortion: he has 3 arms! Look closely at his left shoulder. His arm is obviously hidden but is clearly hanging at his side. Simultaneously, Stanley Dunham puts his 'third hand' over Barack's shoulder (without raising his arm), but it doesn't quite rest on the shoulder -- it floats in the air!
A closer examination reveals that even the park bench is fraudulent. The photo appears to have been compiled in layers and in the following order: the bench, Stanley Dunham, Barack Obama, Madelyn Dunham, Stanley Dunham's suit jacke—entire left side, and Madelyn Dunham's suit jacket — entire right side.
The background, if in the actual setting of Central Park South, should have water on the other side of the wall nearest the bench—not trees. A closer look reveals two walls, the first near the base of the bench, and the second behind that wall. As in the previous set of photos, the subjects are not looking at the same photographer because there wasn't just one photographer—there were at least three, and most likely, six. The alteration/reinsertion of clothing is most visible along Stanley's left lapel and Madelyn's buttonhole side of her suit jacket, which is, abnormally, a straight line. The buttonholes are aligned, but the right-side lapel is definitely smaller than the left lapel, and so, it is out of proportion.
This photo is a complete composite fabrication intended to perpetuate the lie that Barack Obama attended and graduated from Columbia University and was subsequently visited by his grandparents.
Originally posted by Gemwolf
I can't help but shake my head in disbelief - seeing that the website uses (some of) the same photos to "prove" that "Obama is a Human/Reptilian Hybrid"... Linky... I'm sure they can find some more absurdity in the photographs if they tried even harder.
Originally posted by goochball
As much as I'd like to believe this, I don't "clearly see" anything wrong with these photos. I think if you studied any photo long enough you'd probably find something strange about it.
s+f anyways.edit on 4/6/2011 by goochball because: (no reason given)