It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tamahu
Originally posted by Tamahu
Manly P. Hall 33º, V.M. Samael Aun Weor, and V.M. Huiracocha on Freemasonry, the Rosicross Brotherhood, and the Gnostic Church
To add on to the above linked post:
"Therefore, whosoever does not know how to consciously project himself in the astral body, does not know occultism, even if they have the “33rd social degree of Masonry,” even if they are Aquarian devotees, even if they are named Theosophist or even if they self-qualify themselves as a Rosicrucian Knight."
– The Major Mysteries
“Let not one of those who are present here dare to self-qualify himself as a Rosicrucian, because we are nothing but simple aspirants of Rosicrucianism.” Then he added with great solemnity, “Rosicrucians are Buddha, Jesus, Moria, K.H., etc.”
– The Three Mountains by Samael Aun Weor
"Samael Aun Weor & "Crowley's" Thelema"
"The "conspiracy theory" that you read about in the books on the shelves of Borders don't even scratch the surface and only serve to lead someone away from themselves and that is a problem.
"It is OKAY to look into these things, so long as you understand where this aspect of the teaching fits into your understanding of yourself."
Originally posted by no1smootha
reply to post by Rhebefree
You have made a lot of assumptions in your essay, Madame Blavatsky was not a regular Freemason and besides individual Masons can't speak for the fraternity. Her books are interesting but some of her theories are just out there IMO, especially her ideas about race. Also, Pike is NOT the "pope" of Freemasonry! He was Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Masonic Jurisdiction, one of many SGC of various Jurisdictions. I am familiar with Gnosticism but I am by now means an expert, but there are Gnostics here that could set you straight there too. Not that it really matters, because you have framed your essay defending your belief by stating that anyone that says otherwise is either in the know and lying about it or they don't know anything about it, but consider that you are ignoring a third possibility...that what you think is Truth is not true.
edit on 5-4-2011 by no1smootha because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by Rhebefree
I am a Christian and not a Mason; however, like you I have read their stuff also many other "occultists". I think you gave a good summary of what they all have in common at the highest level. In some ways Blavatsky, Crowley and LeVey were more honest with their followers about what conclusiions it leads the initiates to. As for tptb or illuminated ones, they ain't running the show right now and are very confused. Excellent job on your part. Be well.
Originally posted by Rhebefree
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by Rhebefree
I am a Christian and not a Mason; however, like you I have read their stuff also many other "occultists". I think you gave a good summary of what they all have in common at the highest level. In some ways Blavatsky, Crowley and LeVey were more honest with their followers about what conclusiions it leads the initiates to. As for tptb or illuminated ones, they ain't running the show right now and are very confused. Excellent job on your part. Be well.
Thanks for the reply! Im glad you like me! TPTB arent running the show? Please explain how this is the case... Or do you think Lucifer is a physical being and he's running the show? Either way has the same outcome doesnt it. I dont know about any of them being honest, I still think they were just leaving false trails for "thinkers" to pick up on and run with and then decieve others into running with....
Originally posted by Caji316
Thanks, great post...It will take awhile but I'll get back to you also when I go through it all....I am aware of a lot of it but no where near all...There is a sea of Knowledge out there if peeps will just take the time to research it...You will be rewarded for it in the end....Thanks for the post....S & F....
It does matter because if I am wrong about things that I have taken for fact then for sure I need to be shown my error. As for Gnostism, I know only what I have read and I can assure you that what I wrote about Gnostism is correct according to what I have read.
Perhaps I am wrong, perhaps there is no secret organisation running the show and deceiving us all, even learned individuals like yourself, however when people have only so much information to go on of course they are going to form their own assumptions.
These people, from their own mouths, say that they leave clues and information and symbols and whatever else strewn about to mislead and misinform, how do you know that the higher ups in your organisation are willfully misleading you???
And before you chose to be a mason did you ever wonder why one of the criterior was that you beleive in a God? Why is that?
Where did I state that anyone who disagrees with me is "in the know and lying" or dont know anything about it?
I know only what I have read, from the pens of occult and "secret society" authors themselves.
I am not a mason because 1 I am a woman, you guys dont let women in
Masonry is just another form of religion
There is a covert operation in place by a clandestine group who is misleading and using groups that are "exoteric" and groups that are "esoteric" in order to present themselves as humanities benefactors after they have made their lies truth.
However as you are a mason member, I do not veiw your opinion or your facts as partial.
I am neither religous nor mason and am seeing things from the outside looking in. If I am wrong then I am wrong, however if you are wrong then you are being manipulated.
Why did you want to be a mason anyway? If thats not a too personal question
many people on here blast religions as being cults and just social climbing tools and brainwashing scams
but how do those of you, who believe esoteric books, know that what your reading isnt also brain washing material?
The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word “Dogma” in its true sense, of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Every one is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound. It is only required of him that he shall weigh what is taught, and give it fair hearing and unprejudiced judgment. Of course, the ancient theosophic and philosophic speculations are not embodied as part of the doctrines of the Rite; but because it is of interest and profit to know what the Ancient Intellect thought upon these subjects, and because nothing so conclusively proves the radical difference between our human and the animal nature, as the capacity of the human mind to entertain such speculations in regard to itself and the Deity.
Originally posted by Rhebefree
Search for truth yes, allow your interpretation of truth to be guided by institutions that require something of you in return for higher truths?? I dont think so, thats dodgy.
Concerns for the World
"Nevertheless, the wisdom of the creative Demiurge of the universe is magnificent. It is not irrelevant to emphatically tell you that transformation is only possible by means of sacrifice. I.e. if we did not sacrifice the coal in the steam engine, we would not have the steam-power to move the train. Similarly, we will say that by means of a great sacrifice, the transformation of the world will also be possible." – Samael Aun Weor
Types of Spiritual Schools
Gnostic Groups and the Mind
Seeking the Master: Teachers and Students
Originally posted by OnTheLevel213
It does matter because if I am wrong about things that I have taken for fact then for sure I need to be shown my error. As for Gnostism, I know only what I have read and I can assure you that what I wrote about Gnostism is correct according to what I have read.
It may well be (I honestly don't know), but Gnosticism is only one thread of Masonic tradition.
(Ok that may be so, but what Im worried about is that people seem to be in the grip of this "awakening" idea and "ascended masters" idea and they are easily accepting Gnostic concepts that dont quite feel right about, when I follow the trail to see where some of these concepts come from to try and understand their true intentions and I read about occult authors who were masons or who have influenced secret societies and I try to read their books and their saying stuff like; "When mortals shall have become sufficiently spiritualised, there will be no more need of forcing them into a correct comprehension of ancient Wisdom" and;
"To make the point clear once for all: that which the clergy of every dogmatic religion — pre-eminently the Christian — points out as Satan, the enemy of God, is in reality, the highest divine Spirit" and; "symbols and rituals are merely blinds fabricated by the wise to perpetuate ideas incomprehensible to the average individual. He also realized that few Masons of today know or appreciate the mystic meaning concealed within these rituals."
Then of course I put two and two together based on what information is available and conclude that masons are either involved in forcing the rest of us to suitable spiritualisation, or are being manipulated the same way, in many peoples minds it seems, religion has.)
Perhaps I am wrong, perhaps there is no secret organisation running the show and deceiving us all, even learned individuals like yourself, however when people have only so much information to go on of course they are going to form their own assumptions.
What more information would you need to come to a different conclusion?
(thats the thing, the only information available to the seeker of truth is what he/she has access to, on the internet a lot of information is free, I am a single mother so free is good, when I delve into the occult section, books from these authors that you say I should read with caution, if I have misunderstood Masonry it is only because the information about masonry and its "secrets" is scarce outside of whats available online. And if Masonry does not have the different degrees and initiations that we are given to understand it does have what is meant by these authors in reference to degrees and initiation.... Understanding? So a "higher" degree denotes a higher level of understanding the mysteries? If so understanding comes from learning and doing, if what you understand pertains to knowledge someone else has given you then you are only wise in the regards of that knowledge they have given you, so they not you are shaping your wisdom......)
These people, from their own mouths, say that they leave clues and information and symbols and whatever else strewn about to mislead and misinform, how do you know that the higher ups in your organisation are willfully misleading you???
First, because you misunderstand Pike. His references to "Adepts" and "Elects" are not in terms of degree but in the thirst for knowledge that some have and others do not.
(I apologize, I am still attepting to learn, I see terms used by certain people in similar ways and assume they always mean that way)
Second, because there are no "higher-ups" in Masonry, save the Grand Officers, who are of no higher degree than myself. Anything beyond the 3rd degree is of another body related to Freemasonry but having no control of it.
(So what makes them a "Grand officer"?)
And before you chose to be a mason did you ever wonder why one of the criterior was that you beleive in a God? Why is that?
I didn't need to wonder. I knew it was because the lessons of the fraternity are theistic in nature, and the ritual references God throughout.
(Ok? Well what if these lessons that are theistic in nature are meant to sufficiently spiritualize you according to how they would have you spiritualised?)
Where did I state that anyone who disagrees with me is "in the know and lying" or dont know anything about it?
It's a common riposte from anti-Masons. For the record, you did imply the possibility that "Masonic higher-ups" were keeping something from us.
(Only because many people claim that TPTB, which many people believe are involved with the formation of and the running of secret societies, are just using religions (the exoteric) and keeping things from the religous, I was simply attempting to explore the possibility that they were commiting the same act against members of secret societies and that the reasons for doing so look like they reflect the things said in the book 'the secret doctrine')
I know only what I have read, from the pens of occult and "secret society" authors themselves.
Not all of these are created equal. Even authors of some authority like Pike and (to a lesser extent) Hall should be read with caution. Hall wrote all his books on Masonry before becoming a Mason, and Pike is famous for being dense reading; as anti-Masons have shown us, it's very easy to say "this is what Pike thought about X" from three sentences when the one before or after it contradicts that position completely.
(I did not know this, but the fact still remains that something is going on that is Gnostic in nature, that doesnt sit right with me and I believe I have found out what it is, even if the path I took to reach my conclusions are wrong doesnt neccessarily mean my conclusions are wrong...... Either way I trust my intuition)
I am not a mason because 1 I am a woman, you guys dont let women in
Actually, his obedience does.
(I dont understand this remark)
Masonry is just another form of religion
Masonry has no theology, no clergy and no dogma. Calling it a religion severely twists the meaning of that word.
(Hence why I said "another form", I could say its a cult but I dont want to offend anyone since that word has an even more negative connotation to it than religion)
There is a covert operation in place by a clandestine group who is misleading and using groups that are "exoteric" and groups that are "esoteric" in order to present themselves as humanities benefactors after they have made their lies truth.
This may well be, but it isn't Freemasonry.
(Ok, but could it be using Freemasonry?)
However as you are a mason member, I do not veiw your opinion or your facts as partial.
That he is biased does not mean he is incorrect. Too many people these days find a way someone could be biased and presume they've won the argument without addressing any of their arguments. You haven't done this, but I want to nip this in the bud.
(This is true, I apologize)
I am neither religous nor mason and am seeing things from the outside looking in. If I am wrong then I am wrong, however if you are wrong then you are being manipulated.
Or he's just wrong. Freemasonry has no stance on a lot of this, and it certainly isn't discussed in many lodges.
(Really? Ok, so if I understand correctly, Freemasonry is more like a life skills/self help social group??)
Why did you want to be a mason anyway? If thats not a too personal question
Because I have a strong interest in ritual, because I admired the men I knew who were Masons, because I wanted to improve my avenues to provide charity, because I prefer organized socializing to just standing around at a party, and because as a college student I only knew other college students in Jacksonville and thought it might be nice to meet some older people.
(So what makes Masonry different from any religion? And if its not different than any other religion, why the entry criterior? Why cant anyone who wants to learn and grow and improve their avenues to provide for charity (although I dont know what you mean by this dont charities have websites and phone numbers and campaigns?) who want to socialize with others, and become "better" why cant they join? Why do they have to believe in a God? Arent their plenty of Atheists who are good men?
many people on here blast religions as being cults and just social climbing tools and brainwashing scams
No real Mason would ever say this about religion.
(I didnt mean here as in, in the secret society forum, I meant here as in ATS, here as in the internet. Shouldve made that clear my bad.)
but how do those of you, who believe esoteric books, know that what your reading isnt also brain washing material?
Because it says things like this in the preface:
The teachings of these Readings are not sacramental, so far as they go beyond the realm of Morality into those of other domains of Thought and Truth. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite uses the word “Dogma” in its true sense, of doctrine, or teaching; and is not dogmatic in the odious sense of that term. Every one is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue or unsound. It is only required of him that he shall weigh what is taught, and give it fair hearing and unprejudiced judgment. Of course, the ancient theosophic and philosophic speculations are not embodied as part of the doctrines of the Rite; but because it is of interest and profit to know what the Ancient Intellect thought upon these subjects, and because nothing so conclusively proves the radical difference between our human and the animal nature, as the capacity of the human mind to entertain such speculations in regard to itself and the Deity.
(Ok but if your being taught that these authors are wise and their books are to be read with the anticipation of gaining wisdom (if you are initiated?) then you are going to take it at face value that what is contained within is true? Or are these books lessons in discernment? Is that what seperates an initiated mason from an un-initiated mason, or the average reader, being able to discern what is truth in these dusty old books to what is fairy tale?)
Preface to Morals and Dogma