911 Survivor Won't Back Down

reply to post by sonia74


Everyone needs to keep talking about 911 and eventually we'll reach a critical mass. Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, with more joining the roster each day, and the wars won't end until the truth is admitted. The only way to make amends to the world is to hold accountable all the leaders from every country involved. Everyone from the "coalition of the willing" and everyone who maintains the official lie should be tried for crimes against humanity.

I believe we'll see the truth exposed in my lifetime.

reply to post by Yankee451


I hope you're wrong about that. The playing field has never been level and finding things to believe in are getting harder to find, but we can't give up on this. If we do, it means that the group of miscreants who defend the OS win, and that's wrong. They are an evil bunch who deserve to pay for what they've done. I dare one of the weasels to defend their position. What possible good do they bring? I wish them all an untimely demise.

I for one am a strong believer in the fact that the government covered up 911. Think about it the trillions went missing. The part of the Pentagon where the trillions that went missing were on records was hit. So the records were lost. Oh wait? What a coincidence that my friends is proof enough and building 7 puts the icing on the cake. It was a COVER-UP. 100% FACT.

If you deny you are a government sympathizer. It was the Catalyst to get us to engage in multiple wars in the Middle-East and to impose draconian laws against the citizens of the 1st world. WAKE UP

SHEEPLE

Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by Yankee451

 

I hope you're wrong about that. The playing field has never been level and finding things to believe in are getting harder to find, but we can't give up on this. If we do, it means that the group of miscreants who defend the OS win, and that's wrong. They are an evil bunch who deserve to pay for what they've done. I dare one of the weasels to defend their position. What possible good do they bring? I wish them all an untimely demise.

Apocalypse is a good thing for a population living on lies.

Apocalypse is Greek for "the lifting of the veil"...its a metaphor for "waking up".

en.wikipedia.org...

Originally posted by XRaDiiX
I for one am a strong believer in the fact that the government covered up 911. Think about it the trillions went missing. The part of the Pentagon where the trillions that went missing were on records was hit. So the records were lost. Oh wait? What a coincidence that my friends is proof enough and building 7

puts the icing on the cake. It was a COVER-UP. 100% FACT.

If you deny you are a government sympathizer. It was the Catalyst to get us to engage in multiple wars in the Middle-East and to impose draconian laws against the citizens of the 1st world. WAKE UP

SHEEPLE

edit on 6-4-2011 by XRaDiiX because: (no reason given)

Look into Operation Code Angel and Operation Brownstone to see just how huge 911 really was.

What did the Arabs get out of 9/11,besides war in their country for the next 10 years?

What did America get out of it?The list goes on.

Originally posted by GodIsPissed
What did the Arabs get out of 9/11,besides war in their country for the next 10 years?

What did America get out of it?The list goes on.

911 was brought to us courtesy of the same jokers who gave us the Housing Bubble, and the Banker's Bailouts...these guys have been running roughshod on the world ever since. Here's a short list of what some of their goals appear to be:

1. Destroy the toxic White Elephants known as the Twin Towers and remodel New York.
2. Disappear a bunch of Wise Guys in the NYPD, OEM, FDNY, International Finance, Government and the Military.
3. Kill investigations in the SEC and the ONI. Kill the investigators too.
4. Steal tons of bullion for payoffs to the wet workers.
5. Remodel the Pentagon.
6. Provide Pretext to invade Pipelinistan for Unocal, and either overtly or covertly invade the rest of the Middle East one nation at a time.
7. Recharge the geopolitical viability of a certain small, homogeneous Middle Eastern nation.

Etc.

reply to post by Yankee451

Glad to see that someone is still speaking out about this. I hope that one day undeniable proof will surface that will even make those skeptics that attempt to dismiss every bit of evidence regret ever going against the ones who demand the truth.

Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Yankee451

 

Just another eye witness who reported explosives at the Pentagon.

The fact that she exited the Pentagon via the hole created by the impact is strong evidence that an airliner DID NOT hit the Pentagon. NTSB investigators know that enormous airliners do not simply "vaporize" into nothing. Where were all the body parts, where was all the wreckage? There is a startling lack of wreckage and remains at the site, so much so that to state that an airliner with passengers impacted the Pentagon on 9-11 is *FICTIONAL.*

I for one am a strong believer in the fact that the government covered up 911.

The 911 commission made accusations about George Tenet that he was forced to prove false.

Trying to make a patsy out of the director of central intelligence is strong evidence of either covering up on others behalf or utter incompetence.

Neither one of those things is excusable, and would not fly in any real investigation and subsequent trial.

Originally posted by Yankee451

6. Provide Pretext to invade Pipelinistan for Unocal, and either overtly or covertly invade the rest of the Middle East one nation at a time.

Yeah, America has no motive whatsoever to do what they do
what could they possibly want in Afghanistan

Originally posted by conar

Originally posted by Yankee451

6. Provide Pretext to invade Pipelinistan for Unocal, and either overtly or covertly invade the rest of the Middle East one nation at a time.

Yeah, America has no motive whatsoever to do what they do
what could they possibly want in Afghanistan

It always amazed me that the reason given for invading Afghanistan was to destroy the heroin growing infrastructure to stop the cash flow to the terrorists, yet the flow of heroin never ebbed.

Originally posted by jprophet420

Originally posted by conar

Originally posted by Yankee451

6. Provide Pretext to invade Pipelinistan for Unocal, and either overtly or covertly invade the rest of the Middle East one nation at a time.

Yeah, America has no motive whatsoever to do what they do
what could they possibly want in Afghanistan

It always amazed me that the reason given for invading Afghanistan was to destroy the heroin growing infrastructure to stop the cash flow to the terrorists, yet the flow of heroin never ebbed.

Aren't they setting production records now?

Originally posted by Dendro
reply to post by hooper

 

It's funny how the bulkhead of evidence contradicts itself greatly, especially when it comes to the Pentagon. You have an eyewitness who claims that the wings curled in and that's why there was no wing damage to the sides of the building while the MIT computer simulation shows the wings hitting the building, not curling. One is wrong, do you know which? Is it the eyewitness, who happened to also be a reporter driving to work? Or the MIT simulation which utilizes all of the "official" data to create it?

The MIT simulation is wrong. As far as I know there is only one video of a jet hitting a concrete wall. The wings curl upward. I don't have the link off hand but I do remember the wings curling upward. The same thing surely should have occurred for the planes which hit WTC1, WTC2, and the Pentagon. There are very detailed images of those impact holes at WTC1 and WTC2 for your comparison to measure upward curl at the wingtips. Of course the WTC1 and WTC2 could be predicted to have less of a curl because the wings actually seem to have gone through them completely, whereas the effect would be much more pronounced at the Pentagon where a large fraction of the wings came to a full stop at the wall they hit.

Originally posted by GodIsPissedWhat did the Arabs get out of 9/11,besides war in their country for the next 10 years?

Which, for all we know, is exactly what Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri wanted in the first place. bin Ladin was a keen subscriber to the idea, that drawing the Soviet Union into Afghanistan was what destroyed them in the end, and he is probably hoping that the same will happen to the US.

Originally posted by civilchallenger

The MIT simulation is wrong.

That simulation was a joke. I have some comments on the more deceptive parts here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Yankee451


While I admire this gentleman's "quest for the truth" I am curious if he and/or anybody else could tell me what I witnessed with my own two eyes that morning? I laugh every time I read ignorant internet dribble about how a plane didn't hit such and such, or how a building couldn't come down the way it did, parroted over and over by fools who can hardly do math. It makes me weep for the future of our country.

I do, however, believe that 911 could have been prevented and was "allowed" to happen, but I think through ignorance and government incompetence, not through some multi-tiered and impossible to control conspiracy theory put forth by internet tin foil hat morons who don't understand how reality works.

I was there at the Pentagon and and also lost a co-worker in the second plane strike in NY. I'm past getting all emotional about it over the internet, as the more I read the more I realize how idiotic the internet conspiracy crowd can be. The only thing that bothers me is that you all are allowed to vote, lol.

Yes, 911 was crap. It could have been prevented. If the tin foil hat crowd actually focused on the important details maybe we would be able to prevent the next 911. If anyone here works with the government, on any level, then you know what I am talking about. The rest of you are nothing more than internet desk jockeys filled with the ignorance you found online. Sad.

I will not answer any questions that are put forth from a moronic point of view, and from anybody who doesn't have a basic command of reason.

I'll tell you guys this much about the pentagon.... I PERSONALLY know an Intelligence Specialist who was due to report that morning to the part of the building that was hit and was called the night before and told not to come in and to take care of any personal stuff he needed to.

Take that for what it's worth....

Any one of these things by itself means nothing, taken in context and all together, I think only one rational conclusion can be made....

Jaden

p.s. All fo these people stating the eye witnesses saw a plane....Are the same people who would say how unreliable eye witness testimony is when it disagrees with their paradigm...Also, I would normally accept eue witness testimony, although with a grain of salt; however, I was trained to recognise planes and missiles etc.. and it is quite easy for an untrained observer or someone who is under duress to NOT remember or be able to accurately picture what was witnessed.

reply to post by hooper

Yes, of course, as all critical thinkers know, every building is constructed in the same manner with the same materials and react exactly the same to every stress. Of course that's critical thinking.

Are you for real? Why are you suggesting that your comment is an accurate reflection of what Parker Cramer was intending to convey? Can you honestly think we're all so stupid that we won't see the way you've twisted this?

His point was that most buildings are built differently, and as a result of the structural differences between the Pentagon and the Trade Centre buildings, we would expect to see the Planes coming out the other side of the World Trade Centre buildings. Which they didn't.

A relatively light-construction plane couldn't punch a missile-shaped hole in a massively reinforced structure like the Pentagon before (effectively) vaporising. Planting phony evidence after the event didn't work to cover up the incident at Roswell and shouldn't wash here either. You'd think that after 60 years they'd have realised that a few pieces of flim-flam tinfoil are not the best fake evidence to be littering around after a suspiciously 'false-flag-flavour' operation....

Good for her. With her help we can finally bring Chaney to justice.