Pics I took today show the sun plus another glowing ball. Flare?

Originally posted by kromaion
100% sure it's lens effects or sun flare. No doubt at all.

I think I agree. OP stated pictures 2 and 3 were taken an hour or so after the first. The object in question, in pictures 2 & 3, are way too far apart for it not to be. If not..what can seriously travel that fast?

good job with the pics, even if they turn out to be flares... if you werent conscious of the situation, you would never have noticed it.... good hunting!.. i know that since i joined i have not stopped looking up..day or night..... it worries me that TPTB have eyes on OUR future while we stumble in secrecy and cover-ups...

reply to post by kromaion


This right here.

Thanks for the input. I tried to make sure I had all the facts out there so that there would be no 'questions' on what it was or how I took it.

If we ever have a non-cloudy day again here (we do only have 59 sunny days per year!!) I will take some more pics, with another, slightly-less-crappy camera.

Until then, I'll keep researching!
'

Originally posted by cassp83
Thanks for the input. I tried to make sure I had all the facts out there so that there would be no 'questions' on what it was or how I took it.

If we ever have a non-cloudy day again here (we do only have 59 sunny days per year!!) I will take some more pics, with another, slightly-less-crappy camera.

Until then, I'll keep researching!
'

Thank you so much for the effort. I wish there were more like you

This is what a Digital camera does, or a cellphone camera when trying to take a picture of the sun, It is a typical interior lens flare. NOT VERY GOOD FOR YOUR DIGITAL CAMERA THOUGH. I`ve got a couple of pictures like this, including a video. Will try and upload it a bit later.

You can see the same effect moving about as the camera moves about in this video:

when you take photos through your windshield, this is what happens. a flare. there i said it. LENS FLARE.

nice photo's thanx alot for sharing

My question is, did you see something with the naked eye, so you decided to try to take a picture of it, or were you taking random pictures of the sun and later noticed the object/sun dog/lens flare?

Hmm, what if it is a planet. No not that planet. But Mercury, it is pretty close to the sun so, what if thats what it is?

Very nice pictures of the sun.
I see nothing unusual or anything to be alarmed about.
Sundogs and flares are typical when pointing reflective lenses or glass towards
giant fires in the sky.

reply to post by cassp83


To be honest it's a disgrace you posted this and I will tell you why.

When you were taking those images I can guarantee that small ball moved
As you moved the camera / phone. But you posted it anyhow.

I would bet money that you knew this anyhow

I'm sorry to say but you got notting

i was going to say something yesterday when you had 11 flags which i couldn't.. considering your "Fireball" changes position in every single photo.


If it was really planet x, and it was moving that fast... we'd have a problem as of now.

reply to post by cassp83


I do not have the credentials to analyze the photos nor the software, but the last picture intrigues me. I wonder if this is related to the "Nibiru" claims tht have been appearing all over the internet. what is your take?

Don't you guys know a lens flare when you see it?

www.youtube.com...

I do have the equipment and expertise to analyze these pics and.......
solar flare!!!

The nature of the CMOS (built into most digital cameras) is like a million little solar cells in 2D that transform the light into electrons which are then "read" as an individual pixel. These types of chips are less light sensitive than CCD chips but they have a tendency to be susceptible to "noise". The chips themselves will pick up "anomalies" from the lens itself often resulting in "ghosting" when taking a picture of a bright light source.

Do not be dismayed by this info, rather, use it as a control group when taking pics of bright objects.

Oh Yeah......Keep Looking Up!

reply to post by cassp83

I have taken this picture last week when outside in my garden taking the first spring pictures. When I viewed them on my computerscreen I saw the "niburu-flare", didn't think much of it myself though.. Picture taken with Samsung Star.

Originally posted by cassp83
Picture #1 & #2 were taken around 4:30PM EST. There was no more than 2 minutes in between pictures #1 & #2. There was about 1hr in between #2 & #3.

This explanation doesn't describe what is found in pics 1 and 2. And it is important to note it doesn't take photography training to conclude this, just common sense.

In picture 1 the anomaly is at around 3:30/4'o'clockish. Then in a picture supposedly taken "no more than 2 minutes" later the anomaly is all the way down in the 5/5:30ish region.

If this was a real physical object there is no way that it's postion related to the sun's would have changed that much in so short of time. Obviously this is just optical effects of some sort.

reply to post by weedwhacker


Nice filibustering

Now, OP. The problem we run into is being able to duplicate results with different cameras, angles, and locations.

One thing I've never understood from the camp that believes a large object is near the Sun (I'm not saying they're wrong) is that 'why is the object always hanging out close to the Sun'....seems like that would also carry with it the idea of intelligent control...and how would someone or thing control the path of an object that big ?