It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Might usually makes right. At the end of the day, the production capacity, the intellectual capacity and other beneficial traits are what make the victor. NOT being right. That's the white lie. In actual truth, victor is determine beforehand by a simple tally of a nations traits and behaviors.
Originally posted by Redevilfan09
reply to post by jonnywhite
I wonder if Israel attacked a bigger country they would still be good at winning wars? All I see is too piss ant states playing tug of war.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
Israel = modern industry and freedom and renowned scientists
Palestine = some broken down villages and people launching homemade rockets into israel
Which would you rather have on your side? If you didn't know who was right, who would you pick? Siding with israel is just a strategical choice.
Don't forget that our alliance, if that's what it's to be called, is of strategic interest in that region. Israel holds its own, though. Since 1967 we've given them quite a bit but that was on top of what was already a success. Basically, one can say that Israel has value to us and value is might, fundamentally. Their value is greater than palestine - is what I'm saying - and if I'm faced with confusion about who is morally right, I side with what the math tells me.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Originally posted by jonnywhite
Israel = modern industry and freedom and renowned scientists
Palestine = some broken down villages and people launching homemade rockets into israel
Which would you rather have on your side? If you didn't know who was right, who would you pick? Siding with israel is just a strategical choice.
The main problem with your logic here is that Israel is what it is because of the support of "the west" not because it just out competed Palestine on its own and we backed the better nation. You have cause and effect entirely backwards. If "the west" had not been supporting Israel all these years all you would see is a little burned greasy streak on the map where Israel used to be.
Israel was created to serve "western" economic ends. Sure, it has its own agenda, which is often problematic for the corporatists, but the nice thing about that religious agenda is it keeps Christians in many western nations supportive of Israel and the economic policies in the region.
If Israel was not crucial to end time prophecies, you would not have much support for Israel at all in the US.
edit on 25-3-2011 by Illusionsaregrander because: (no reason given)
I agree 100% with you. I'm only stating that Palestine is a wreck compared to Israel. My example was maybe not perfect, but you get it? I refrain from judging the moral-ness of israel or palestine's activities. I simply put my bet on Israel because they're the better.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by jonnywhite
Homemade rockets?
The border is open between Gaza and Egypt and RUSSIAN/IRANIAN made rockets, DE-FACTO rockets, are being launched into Israeli towns..
Apparently every response Israel does is "disproportionate"
Lets say this was Tijuana, and Rockets were being launched into San Diego neighborhoods. What would be the 'proportional' response? Surely any sensible person would understand that whats proportionate, is whats Necessary. If they wont stop doing it, something must be done to prevent its continuance. THEY are the ones bringing any perceieved 'disproporationate' attack on themselves.
I cannot kill a person of a particular town, than hide amongst my friends in another town, and commit the same offence every month, expecting those hiding me not to incur a measure of the punishment when those of the other town finally resolve to do something about it. War is not so simple to just give a 'proportionate' attack ie; they kill one person, and so i should kill one aswell. If one party is innocent, while the other is initiating those attacks, than ALL who support or abet the activities of the guilty party are guilty-by-association. This is how domestic law works. If i hide a fugitive i am likely to go to jail aswell.
If Palestinians tolerate Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al Aqsa Brigade, and if the PLO refuses to specifically denounce any of these groups... and if attacks from Palestine against Israeli civilians continue to occur, than the only rational way to insure ones own safety is to punish the Palestinian people. Obviously, not to a great degree, but to a point where THEY will take it upon themselves not to harbor and abet terrorists.
Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander
I also look at it from another aspect, and considering the fact that as a person if I had been treated the way the Jews have been treated, I might be a little quicker than usual to lash out when infringed upon.
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
I, for one, would hope our Canadian military would intervene and do the same thing if Alaskan terrorists were lobbing rockets, whether they hit or not, in our territory.
You see neither side is good or moral. No doubt about it. That's why so many disagree. I've been here and done that. This is why I stopped trying to find out who was morally right. When you look at history, what you see is nations fighting over things. And you see might often making right. It's more often the case than not. It's just the reality of our material existence. It's our priority. How can you blame us? We need food and air and resources to live.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
I, for one, would hope our Canadian military would intervene and do the same thing if Alaskan terrorists were lobbing rockets, whether they hit or not, in our territory.
I'm sorry, I must have missed the part where Canada had an Apartheid on Alaska and set up a blockade(Act Of War) on almost all imports and exports and ensures that Alaska gets minimal water
Do you have a link on Canada doing that to Alaska perhaps?
Thx in advance
Originally posted by jonnywhite
It's just the reality of our material existence. It's our priority. How can you blame us? We need food and air and resources to live.
I'm sorry but the only evolution is through jesus and death. It'll never change in this world. Many people peddle this idea that one day everything will be better. But the reality is they' believe their own lies. This world has as much potential as hitler did as a holyman.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
Originally posted by jonnywhite
It's just the reality of our material existence. It's our priority. How can you blame us? We need food and air and resources to live.
You are right, like any other animal, we will fight and kill for resources. Lets just not dress it up and pretend it is something it isnt. In this case, you have a group of people imported into an area and displacing the natives, and stealing their land and resources, and lets just call it what it is. A brutal and animal attempt to slaughter others to promote your own kind.
You know we HAVE birth control. Human beings COULD decide to drop to population levels which allowed the various groups of humans good quality of life around the globe. We could choose to maintain numbers that didnt require us to constantly be raping and pillaging and displacing etc.
We could decide to evolve, we have the technology, just not the desire.
Originally posted by muse7
Yeah I'd say! I mean if Canada was wiped out from the map by the U.N to be replaced with another country and Canadians were forced to stay in Newfoundland wouldn't you guys also try some sort of retaliation?
Originally posted by fedeykin
i dont see any of them lobbing bombs or threatening to drive the white man into the sea.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
]I'm sorry but the only evolution is through jesus and death. It'll never change in this world