It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hillynilly
I sure hope this whole quake situation does not
interfere with the taping of ninja warrior..
I love that show.
Originally posted by ethancoop
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
With a technologically advanced country like Japan that specializes in high tech gizoms such as robots I'm surprised they haven't sent something in.
Too early to make a "domo arigato Mr Roboto" joke?
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Originally posted by defenestrator
Originally posted by ethancoop
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
With a technologically advanced country like Japan that specializes in high tech gizoms such as robots I'm surprised they haven't sent something in.
Too early to make a "domo arigato Mr Roboto" joke?
Yes, too early, also; Styx are not Japanese.
This ain't a TV show.edit on 3/16/2011 by defenestrator because: semicolon
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Well i'm sure the technology has advanced much more since Chernobyl when it comes to Robotics along with modern metallurgy and electronics. Are you telling me that to let a remote controlled robot with a firehose inside the building for 1/2 an hour is not do-able?
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Well i'm sure the technology has advanced much more since Chernobyl when it comes to Robotics along with modern metallurgy and electronics. Are you telling me that to let a remote controlled robot with a firehose inside the building for 1/2 an hour is not do-able?
I'm sure it could be done if they had a robot designed and built to carry a fire hose into a random building with the ability to make it's way past obstacles and access doors find the target and hit it. If they had something like that I would imagine they would be using it unless we are to believe these people are capable of building one, but too stupid to remember they have it.
Russia's atomic chief says the nuclear crisis in Japan is developing according to worst-case scenario.
Well what are the possible effects on a Robot besides the electronics? Can't they use a Hydraulically controlled robot with a 1000 feet long electric cable attached to a generator outside and a firehose attached to a water pump sucking water from outside the plant to operate every few hours. They thought about using Helicopter for crying out loud. Just throwing this out there.
Originally posted by defenestrator
reply to post by nghtshd
If there are not exposure suits for humans safe enough for these levels of radiation, it is possible the robots suffer the same fate, I'm not a proficient enough scientist to know anything about that, but I agree it is unlikely the entire Japanese govt. forgot about robots.
Originally posted by ethancoop
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Well i'm sure the technology has advanced much more since Chernobyl when it comes to Robotics along with modern metallurgy and electronics. Are you telling me that to let a remote controlled robot with a firehose inside the building for 1/2 an hour is not do-able?
I'm sure it could be done if they had a robot designed and built to carry a fire hose into a random building with the ability to make it's way past obstacles and access doors find the target and hit it. If they had something like that I would imagine they would be using it unless we are to believe these people are capable of building one, but too stupid to remember they have it.
Key word you didn't pick up on. Improvise.
Lunokhod designers were called back from retirement, and in two weeks they produced a six wheel remote control vehicle prototype that was light enough to operate on the weakened roof. Since the original Lunokhod moon rovers used nuclear decay heatsources for internal rack climate control, their electronic systems were already hardened to resist radiation. This benefit allowed the 1986 designers to quickly devise a derived vehicle type for nuclear disaster recovery work. Eventually two such rovers were delivered to the Chernobyl accident zone and proved useful for clearing debris, earning awards for the designers. Due to extremely high radiation levels, all rovers eventually failed, and human workers (later named liquidators) were called in.
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by ethancoop
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Well i'm sure the technology has advanced much more since Chernobyl when it comes to Robotics along with modern metallurgy and electronics. Are you telling me that to let a remote controlled robot with a firehose inside the building for 1/2 an hour is not do-able?
I'm sure it could be done if they had a robot designed and built to carry a fire hose into a random building with the ability to make it's way past obstacles and access doors find the target and hit it. If they had something like that I would imagine they would be using it unless we are to believe these people are capable of building one, but too stupid to remember they have it.
Key word you didn't pick up on. Improvise.
If only this were a McGuyver episode.
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by ethancoop
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Well i'm sure the technology has advanced much more since Chernobyl when it comes to Robotics along with modern metallurgy and electronics. Are you telling me that to let a remote controlled robot with a firehose inside the building for 1/2 an hour is not do-able?
I'm sure it could be done if they had a robot designed and built to carry a fire hose into a random building with the ability to make it's way past obstacles and access doors find the target and hit it. If they had something like that I would imagine they would be using it unless we are to believe these people are capable of building one, but too stupid to remember they have it.
Key word you didn't pick up on. Improvise.
If only this were a McGuyver episode.
Forget McGyver. He is old now.
See the link below for the Robotics Test in a Nuclear Radiation Environment.
ROBOTICS_TEST1
ROBOTICS_TEST2
I'm not sure if someone typed what was in this paper in some of the above posts but Here is a Robotics Paper from 2000... See page 48
ROBOTICS_PAPER
There are many articles about Robots in the Nuclear industry on the web.
Originally posted by defenestrator
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by ethancoop
Originally posted by nghtshd
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by zero1020
reply to post by hp1229
If I remember correctly, they tried using robots in Chernobyl but the robots started to malfunction. I have no idea how much radiation it takes to cause problems but I'm sure the entire Japanese government didn't over look robots.
Well i'm sure the technology has advanced much more since Chernobyl when it comes to Robotics along with modern metallurgy and electronics. Are you telling me that to let a remote controlled robot with a firehose inside the building for 1/2 an hour is not do-able?
I'm sure it could be done if they had a robot designed and built to carry a fire hose into a random building with the ability to make it's way past obstacles and access doors find the target and hit it. If they had something like that I would imagine they would be using it unless we are to believe these people are capable of building one, but too stupid to remember they have it.
Key word you didn't pick up on. Improvise.
If only this were a McGuyver episode.
Forget McGyver. He is old now.
See the link below for the Robotics Test in a Nuclear Radiation Environment.
ROBOTICS_TEST1
ROBOTICS_TEST2
I'm not sure if someone typed what was in this paper in some of the above posts but Here is a Robotics Paper from 2000... See page 48
ROBOTICS_PAPER
There are many articles about Robots in the Nuclear industry on the web.
Can we just admit we don't know for certain? Thanks for the links, very sincerely.